Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 2437–2444 | Cite as

Out-of-plane dual flexure MEMS piezoresistive accelerometer with low cross axis sensitivity

  • K. Hari
  • Satish Kumar Verma
  • I. R. Praveen Krishna
  • V. Seena
Technical Paper

Abstract

Accelerometers are one of the widely explored microsensors with many transduction mechanisms. One of the primary concerns with piezoresistive microaccelerometers is their cross axis sensitivity. The main reason for cross axis response is the mechanical offset between the flexures and the center of mass of the proofmass. Cross axis sensitivity is generally minimized electronically using bridge configurations of piezoresistors or by depositing high density materials like gold over the proofmass to balance the mechanical structure. Here a novel non planar dual flexure geometry has been proposed which make the effective beam center of mass to align with that of the proof mass and thereby achieve low cross axis sensitivity by the mechanical design itself. The hybrid integration of electronic compensation with the mechanical compensation realizes a high performance accelerometer with ultralow cross axis sensitivity. Four piezoresistors placed on one flexure are configured such that the output voltage will be maximum for prime axis input while the bridge is balanced for the inputs along remaining two axes. The analytical model of the proposed structure, and the finite element analysis results are discussed. The device exhibits a very low cross axis sensitivity of 0.006% in Y direction and 0.005% in X direction while maintaining high prime axis sensitivity of 2.28 mV/g. The device also shows very low non linearity (1%) over a range of 100 g acceleration and a resonant frequency of 1.7 kHz.

References

  1. Barlian AA, Park WT, Mallon JR, Rastegar AJ, Pruitt BL (2009) Review: semiconductor piezoresistance for microsystems. Proc IEEE 97:513–552.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2013612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen H, Bao M, Zhu H, Shen S (1997) A piezoresistive accelerometer with a novel vertical beam structure. Sens Actuators A 63:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80424-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kal S, Das S, Mourya D, Biswas K, Ravi Sankar A, Lahiri S (2006) CMOS compatible bulk micromachined silicon piezoresistive accelerometer with low off-axis sensitivity. Microelectron J 37:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim KH, Ko JS, Cho Y-H, Lee K, Kwak BM, Park K (1995) A skew-symmetric cantilever accelerometer for automotive airbag applications. Sens Actuators A 50:121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(96)80095-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kwon K, Park S (1998) A bulk-micromachined three-axis accelerometer using silicon direct bonding technology and polysilicon layer. Sens Actuators A 66:250–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00078-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Li Y, Zheng Q, Hu Y, Xu Y (2011) Micromachined piezoresistive accelerometers based on an asymmetrically gapped cantilever. J Microelectromech Syst 20:83–94.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2100024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu Y, Zhao Y, Tian B, Sun L, Yu Z, Jiang Z (2014) Analysis and design for piezoresistive accelerometer geometry considering sensitivity, resonant frequency and cross-axis sensitivity. Microsyst Technol 20:463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-013-1894-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Partridge A, Reynolds JK, Chui BW, Chow EM, Fitzgerald AM, Zhang L, Kenny TW (2000) A high-performance planar piezoresistive accelerometer. J Microelectromech Syst 9:58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1109/84.825778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Plaza JA, Chen H, Esteve J, Lora-Tamayo E (1998) New bulk accelerometer for triaxial detection. Sens Actuators A 66:105–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(97)01735-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ravi Sankar A, Das S (2013) A very-low cross-axis sensitivity piezoresistive accelerometer with an electroplated gold layer atop a thickness reduced proof mass. Sens Actuators A 189:125–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ravi Sankar A, Grace Jency J, Ashwini J, Das S (2012) Realisation of silicon piezoresistive accelerometer with proof mass-edge-aligned-flexures using wet anisotropic etching. Micro Nano Lett 7:118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roylance LM, Angell JB (1979) A batch-fabricated silicon accelerometer. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 26:1911–1917.  https://doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1979.19795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Kampen RP, Wolffenbuttel RF (1998) Modeling the mechanical behavior of bulk-micromachined silicon accelerometers. Sens Actuators A 64:137–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(98)80007-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yazdi N, Ayazi F, Najafi K (1998) Micromachined inertial sensors. Proc IEEE 86:1640–1659.  https://doi.org/10.1109/5.704269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Hari
    • 1
  • Satish Kumar Verma
    • 1
  • I. R. Praveen Krishna
    • 2
  • V. Seena
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AvionicsIndian Institute of Space Science and TechnologyThiruvananthapuramIndia
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of Space Science and TechnologyThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations