Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 2277–2285 | Cite as

Single layer thin photoresist soft etch mask for MEMS applications

  • Robin Joyce
  • Deepak Kumar Panwar
  • Moh. Shakil
  • Soney Varghese
  • Jamil Akhtar
Technical Paper
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

Substrate masking plays an important role in wet chemical etching process, however; coating a cost effective masking material with higher stability in the harsh chemical environment is still a challenge in MEMS technology. The durability of a masking material is determined by its capability in withstanding harsh chemicals, whether the material is a soft mask, hard mask or even a metal mask. Conventional substrate masking over wafers includes metal masks or thick photoresist (PR) masks or even multilayer masking. This paper presents an efficient procedure for substrate masking using an uncommon, less viscous photoresist. The optimization results of this photoresist have been reported in this paper. By optimization, an optimal procedure to withstand the PR in harsh chemicals was formulated. The method is highly reliable and cost effective. This procedure was implemented for different MEMS applications to prove the feasibility of substrate masking.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Director, CSIR-CEERI, Pilani and Head of SNST, NIT Calicut, are thanked for their constant support and encouragement. The authors wish to thank and acknowledge the entire team of SNT and MEMS groups, CSIR-CEERI Pilani, for their support and wealthy discussions. The authors also heartfully thank Mr. L. Bhanuprakash for his support with the AFM images.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Chiu DT, Wu H, Schueller OJ, Whitesides GM (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly (dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21(1):27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bien DCS, Rainey PV, Mitchell SJN, Gamble HS (2003) Characterization of masking materials for deep glass micromachining. J Micromech Microeng 13(4):S34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Q, Gang L, Qing HJ, Zhao JL, Ren QS, Xu YS (2007) A rapid and low-cost procedure for fabrication of glass microfluidic devices. J Microelectromech Syst 16(5):1193–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Zhang L, Chen G (2008) Fabrication, modification, and application of poly (methyl methacrylate) microfluidic chips. Electrophoresis 29(9):1801–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng J, Shoffner MA, Hvichia GE, Kricka LJ, Wilding P (1996) Chip PCR. II. Investigation of different PCR amplification systems in microfabricated silicon-glass chips. Nucleic Acids Res 24(2):380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conradie EH, Moore DF (2002) SU-8 thick photoresist processing as a functional material for MEMS applications. J Micromech Microeng 12(4):368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Effenhauser CS, Manz A, Widmer HM (1993) Glass chips for high-speed capillary electrophoresis separations with submicrometer plate heights. Anal Chem 65(19):2637–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehrlich DJ, Matsudaira P (1999) Microfluidic devices for DNA analysis. Trends Biotechnol 17(8):315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan ZH, Harrison DJ (1994) Micromachining of capillary electrophoresis injectors and separators of glass chips and evaluation of flow at capillary intersections. Anal. Chem 66(1):177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grosse A, Grewe M, Fouckhardt H (2001) Deep wet etching of fused silica glass for hollow capillary optical leaky waveguides in microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng 11(3):257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iliescu C, Jing J, Tay FEH, Miao J, Sun T (2005) Characterization of masking layers for deep wet etching of glass in an improved HF/HCl solution. Surf Coat Technol 198(1–3):314–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iliescu C, Chen B, Miao J (2008) On the wet etching of Pyrex glass. Sens Actuators A: Phys 143(1):154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joyce R, Yadav S, Sharma AK, Panwar DK, Bhatia RR, Varghese S, Akhtar J (2016) Pattern transfer of microstructures between deeply etched cavities for MEMS applications. Mater Sci Semicond Process 56:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ko JS, Yoon HC, Yang H, Pyo HB, Chung KH, Kim SJ, Kim YT (2003) A polymer-based microfluidic device for immunosensing biochips. Lab Chip 3(2):106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee JN, Park C, Whitesides GM (2003) Solvent compatibility of poly (dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 75(23):6544–6554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin CH, Lee GB, Lin YH, Chang GL (2001) A fast prototyping process for fabrication of microfluidic systems on soda-lime glass. J Micromech Microeng 11(6):726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mata A, Fleischman AJ, Roy S (2006) Fabrication of multi-layer SU-8 microstructures. J Micromech Microeng 16(2):276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rebenklau L, Wolter KJ, Howitz S (2000) Realization of hybrid microfluidic systems using standard LTCC process. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 50th electronic components and technology conference, pp 1696–1700Google Scholar
  19. Seiler K, Harrison DJ, Manz A (1993) Planar glass chips for capillary electrophoresis: repetitive sample injection, quantitation, and separation efficiency. Anal Chem 65(10):1481–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shoffner MA, Cheng J, Hvichia GE, Kricka LJ, Wilding P (1996) Chip PCR. I. Surface passivation of microfabricated silicon-glass chips for PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 24(2):375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stjernstrm M, Roeraade J (1998) Method for fabrication of microfluidic systems in glass. J Micromech Microeng 8(1):33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wheeler AR, Throndset WR, Whelan RJ, Leach AM, Zare RN, Liao YH, Farrell K, Manger ID, Daridon A (2003) Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis. Anal Chem 75(14):3581–3586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang J, Tan KL, Hong GD, Yang LJ, Gong HQ (2001) Polymerization optimization of SU-8 photoresist and its applications in microfluidic systems and MEMS. J Micromech Microeng 11(1):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Joyce
    • 1
    • 2
  • Deepak Kumar Panwar
    • 2
  • Moh. Shakil
    • 2
  • Soney Varghese
    • 1
  • Jamil Akhtar
    • 2
  1. 1.Nanomaterials and Devices Research Laboratory, School of Nano Science and TechnologyNITCalicutIndia
  2. 2.Sensors and Nanotechnology GroupCSIR-CEERIPilaniIndia

Personalised recommendations