Analyses and statistics of the electrical fail for flip chip packaging by using ANSYS simulation software and really underfill materials

  • Shang-Te Tsai
  • Chi-Yu Lin
  • Sung-Mao Wu
  • Chung-Yao Chang
  • Cheng-Fu Yang
Technical Paper


ANSYS simulation software has gold standard for modeling and simulating surface chemistry reactions that are used for the conceptual development of combustion systems in chemical and materials processing equipment. In this study, three different models of the solder bumps were arranged, designed, and simulated by ANSYS simulation software. The first model was a single solder bump, which had the height of 70 µm and diameter of 115 µm, and the both diameters to contact upper chip and lower substrates were 90 µm. The second model was that the single solder bumps were arranged to form an array with different spacing between two “single solder bumps”, the area and height were 1520 μm × 3610 μm and 70 μm. The third model was that the single solder bumps with two different arranged arrays were formed on the substrates on different sides, the distances between two “single solder bumps” had different values in the two arranged arrays, and the area and height for this model were 2600 μm × 2570 μm and 70 μm. We would use five differently underfill materials with different properties (including viscosity) as the simulated parameters in the third model. Finally, the five underfill materials were used in the dispensing experiment to find the optimum one for the flip chip packaging.



The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports of the projects with the nos. of MOST 106-2221-E-390-019 and MOST 105-2622-E-390-003-CC3.


  1. ANSYS Acquires SpaceClaim Corporation (2016) A leading provider of 3-D modeling software. Retrieved 27 Sept 2016
  2. ANSYS Autodyn (2016) Equations of motion. Retrieved 27 Sept 2016
  3. Brand S, Vogg G, Petzold M (2017) Defect analysis using scanning acoustic microscopy for bonded microelectronic components with extended resolution and defect sensitivity. Microsyst Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00542-017-3521-7 Google Scholar
  4. Ichikawa N, Hosokawa K, Maeda R (2004) Interface motion of capillary-driven flow in rectangular microchannel. J Colloid Interface Sci 280:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jong WR, Kuo TH, Ho SW, Chiu HH, Peng SH (2007) Flows in rectangular microchannels driven by capillary forces and gravity. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 34:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim YB, Sung J (2012) Capillary-driven micro flows for the underfill process in microelectronics packaging. J Mech Sci Technol 26:3751–3759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lehmann G, Maria A, Lee PC, Cotts EJ (1997) Modeling the underfill flow process. In: Proceedings of technical program, conference on surface mount technology, San Jose, CA, USA, pp 340–350Google Scholar
  8. Macosko CW (1994) Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications. VCH Publishers Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Nguyen L, Quentin C, Fine P, Cobb B, Bayyuk S, Yang H, Bidstrup-Allen SA (1999) Underfill of flip chip on laminates: simulation and validation. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 22:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nguyen ATT, Tjulkins F, Aasmundtveit KE, Hoivik N, Hoff L, Imene K (2015) Miniaturization of package for an implantable heart monitoring device. Microsyst Technol 21:1813–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tummala RR (2001) Fundamentals of microsystems packaging. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang J (2002) Underfill of flip chip on organic substrate: viscosity, surface tension, and contact angle. Microelectron Reliab 42:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang H, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Li D, Xu K (2011) Three-dimensional simulation of underfill process in flip-chip encapsulation. Comput Fluids 44:187–2011CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang C, Young WB (2013) The effective permeability of the underfill flow domain in flip-chip packaging. Appl Math Model 37:1177–1186CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Young WB (2004) Capillary impregnation into cylinder banks. J Colloid Interface Sci 273:576–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Young WB, Yang WL (2002) The effect of solder bump pitch on the underfill flow. IEEE Trans Adv Packag 25:537–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang ZQ, Wong CP (2009) Flip-chip underfill: materials, process, and reliability. In: Lu D, Wong CP (eds) Materials for advanced packaging. Springer, pp 307–338. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-78219-5

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shang-Te Tsai
    • 1
  • Chi-Yu Lin
    • 2
  • Sung-Mao Wu
    • 3
  • Chung-Yao Chang
    • 3
  • Cheng-Fu Yang
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementNingde Normal UniversityNingdeChina
  2. 2.Department of Aero-Electronic EngineeringAir Force Institute of TechnologyKaohsiungTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational University of KaohsiungKaohsiungTaiwan, ROC
  4. 4.Department of Chemical and Materials EngineeringNational University of KaohsiungKaohsiungTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations