Does local factors alter discharge times after surgery?
- 335 Downloads
To the Editor:
We read with great interest the article of Nishida et al.  in a recent issue of the journal. The authors evaluated patients < 18 years of age who underwent pediatric ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia and concluded that increased time spent in a hospital was affected by the type of regional block, surgery, and intraoperative fluid volume. The authors should be congratulated for performing a well-designed trial in an important topic in pediatric patients . Moreover, current emphasis on fluid management and regional blocks as a part of enhanced recovery protocols makes the topic more relevant .
There are some questions that need to be clarified to determine the validity of the results. First, the authors arbitrarily defined prolonged stay as within 8 h at the end of anesthesia. It would be important to perform a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate if their results differ when other time cutoffs are utilized (e.g., 6 and 4 h). Second, it is unclear how frequent patients were assessed using the PADSS instrument and if the results can be affected by bias on unstandardized discharge evaluations. Last, most studies examining discharge times demonstrate < 3 h. One could argue that the discharge time in this study is driven by practice characteristics and therefore, poor generalizability to other centers.
No funding was sought.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and nothing to disclose.