Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in adults after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) is a scale showing the amount of vasoactive and inotropic support. Recently, it was suggested that the VIS after cardiac surgery predicts morbidity and mortality in infants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the VIS at the end of surgery as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in adult cardiac surgery.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 129 adult cardiac surgery patients was performed at a university hospital. The primary outcome was termed “poor outcome”, which was a composite of morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and time to first extubation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the VIS and poor outcomes. A proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the duration of the ICU stay and time to first extubation.

Results

After adjusting for the EuroSCORE, preoperative ejection fraction, and bypass time, a high VIS at the end of surgery was associated with a poor outcome with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.87 (95% confidence interval 1.51–18.94; p = 0.007). After controlling for the EuroSCORE and bypass time, patients with a high VIS experienced longer ICU stay (hazard ratio 1.62; 95% confidence interval 1.10–2.39; p = 0.015) and needed longer ventilation (hazard ration 1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.28–2.74, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The amount of cardiovascular support at the end of cardiac surgery may predict morbidity and mortality in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ettema RGA, Peelen LM, Schuurmans MJ, Nierich AP, Kalkman CJ, Moons KGM. Prediction models for prolonged intensive care stay after cardiac surgery: systematic review and validation study. Circulation. 2010;122:682–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Granton J, Cheng D. Risk stratification models for cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;12:167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cislaghi F, Condemi AM, Corona A. Predictors of prolonged ventilation in a cohort of 5123 cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson AJ, Barros Neto FX, Costa Mde A, Dantas LD, Hueb AC, Prata MF. Predictors of mortality in patients over 70-year-old undergoing CABG or valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Widyastuti Y, Stenseth R, Pleym H, Wahba A, Videm V. Pre-operative and intraoperative determinants for prolonged ventilation following adult cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:190–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Widyastuti Y, Stenseth R, Berg KS, Pleym H, Wahba A, Videm V. Preoperative and intraoperative prediction of risk of cardiac dysfunction following open heart surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parolari A, Pesce LL, Pacini D, Mazzanti V, Salis S, Sciacovelli C, Rossi F, Alamanni F, Monzino Research Group on Cardiac Surgery Outcomes. Risk factors for perioperative acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery: role of perioperative management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:584–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaies MG, Gurney JG, Yen AH, Napoli ML, Gajarski RJ, Ohye RG, Charpie JR, Hirsch JC. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11:234–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wernovsky G, Wypij D, Jonas RA, Mayer JE Jr, Hanley FL, Hickey PR, Walsh AZ, Chang RN, Anthony C, Castaneda AR, Newburger JW, Wessel DL. Postoperative course and hemodynamic profile after the arterial switch operation in neonates and infants. A comparison of low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Circulation. 1995;92:2226–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basaran M, Sever K, Kafali E, Ugurlucan M, Sayin OA, Tansel T, Alpagut U, Dayioglu E, Onursal E. Serum lactate level has prognostic significance after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006;20:43–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruenwald CE, McCrindle BW, Crawford-Lean L, Holtby H, Parshuram C, Massicotte P, Van Arsdell G. Reconstituted fresh whole blood improves clinical outcomes compared with stored component blood therapy for neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1442–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kulik TJ, Moler FW, Palmisano JM, Custer JR, Mosca RS, Bove EL, Bartlett RH. Outcome-associated factors in pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenator after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1996;94:II63–8.

  13. Rhodes JF, Blaufox AD, Seiden HS, Asnes JD, Gross RP, Rhodes JP, Griepp RB, Rossi AF. Cardiac arrest in infants after congenital heart surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:II194–9.

  14. Shahin J, Devarennes B, Tse CW, Amarica DA, Dial S. The relationship between inotrope exposure, 6-h postoperative physiological variables, hospital mortality and renal dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15:R162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fellahi JL, Parienti JJ, Hanouz JL, Plaud B, Riou B, Ouattara A. Perioperative use of dobutamine in cardiac surgery and adverse cardiac outcome: propensity-adjusted analyses. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:979–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, Gauducheau E, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, Cortina J, David M, Faichney A, Gabrielle F, Gams E, Harjula A, Jones MT, Pintor PP, Salamon R, Thulin L. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:816–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation. 1989;79:I3–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Motomura N, Miyata H, Tsukihara H, Takamoto S, Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database Organization. Risk model of valve surgery in Japan using the Japan adult cardiovascular surgery database. J Heart Valve Dis. 2010;19:684–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup. Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Srisawat N, Hoste EE, Kellum JA. Modern classification of acute kidney injury. Blood Purif. 2010;29:300–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Englberger L, Suri RM, Li Z, Casey ET, Daly RC, Dearani JA, Schaff HV. Clinical accuracy of RIFLE and acute kidney injury network (AKIN) criteria for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15:R16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Royster RL, Butterworth JF 4th, Prough DS, Johnston WE, Thomas JL, Hogan PE, Case LD, Gravlee GP. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of inotropic support and long-term outcome in patients having coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg. 1991;72:729–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Butterworth JF 4th, Legault C, Royster RL, Hammon JW Jr. Factors that predict the use of positive inotropic drug support after cardiac valve surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:461–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McKinlay KH, Schinderle DB, Swaminathan M, Podgoreanu MV, Milano CA, Messier RH, El-Moalem H, Newman MF, Clements FM, Mathew JP. Predictors of inotrope use during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:404–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Cocker J, Messaoudi N, Stockman BA, Bossaert LL, Rodrigus IE. Preoperative prediction of intensive care unit stay following cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:60–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwann NM, Hillel Z, Hoeft A, Barash P, Möhnle P, Miao Y, Mangano DT. Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:994–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pölönen P, Ruokonen E, Hippeläinen M, Pöyhönen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1052–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. St André AC, DelRossi A. Hemodynamic management of patients in the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2082–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujishima K, Yamamoto A, Hachisu M. Effects of amrinone on renal flow and cardiac function, in comparison with those of milrinone and olprinone, in anesthetized dog. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1998;112(6):371–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kimata S, Kasanuki H, Hirosawa H, Takano A, Serizawa T, Shinoyama S, Kumada T, Hori M, Hiramori K. Clinical assessment of E-1020 in acute heart failure—optimal dose assessment (in Japanese). Jpn J Clin Exp Med. 1992;69:3984–96.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sha K, Shimokawa M, Ishimaru K, Kawaraguchi Y, Takahashi M, Yanaidani F, Kitaguchi K, Furuya H. Differences in hemodynamic effects of amrinone, milrinone and olprinone after cardiopulmonary bypass in valvular cardiac surgery. Masui. 2000;49(9):981–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Heart Failure Society of America. HFSA 2006 comprehensive heart failure guideline. J Card Fail. 2006;12:el–122.

  33. Kozlik-Feldmann R, Kramer HH, Wicht H, Feldmann R, Netz H, Reinhardt D. Distribution of myocardial beta-adrenoceptor subtypes and coupling to the adenylate cyclase in children with congenital heart disease and implication for treatment. J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;33(7):588–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gillies M, Bellomo R, Doolan L, Buxton B. Bench-to-bedside review: inotropic drug therapy after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic literature review. Crit Care. 2005;9:266–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mebazaa A, Parissis J, Porcher R, Gayat E, Nikolaou M, Boas FV, Delgado JF, Follath F. Short-term survival by treatment among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure: the global ALARM-HF registry using propensity scoring methods. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:290–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary. Artery catheterization. Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on pulmonary artery catheterization. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:775–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacka MJ, Cohen MM, To T, Devitt JH, Byrick R. The appropriateness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiovascular surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49:276–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jacka MJ, Cohen MM, To T, Devitt JH, Byrick R. The use of and preferences for the transesophageal echocardiogram and pulmonary artery catheter among cardiovascular anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1065–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Giglio M, Dalfino L, Puntillo F, Rubino G, Marucci M, Brienza N. Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15(5):878–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YY: this author designed, analyzed, and prepared manuscript. KO: this author helped to design the study and analyzed data. YM: this author helped to prepare manuscript. YM: this author helped to conduct the study and prepare manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yumiko Yamazaki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

540_2018_2447_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplement Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve of vasoactive inotropic score. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.77 and the optimal cutoff point of the VIS to determine the high and low VIS groups was 5.5, with sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.54. AUC, area under the curve (JPEG 19 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamazaki, Y., Oba, K., Matsui, Y. et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in adults after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Anesth 32, 167–173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2447-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2447-2

Keywords

Navigation