Neuro-fuzzy analytics in athlete development (NueroFATH): a machine learning approach


Athletes represent the apex of physical capacity filling in a social picture of performance and build. In light of the fundamental contrasts in athletic capacities required for different games, each game demands an alternate body type standard. Because of the decent variety of these body types, each can have an altogether different body standard. Nowadays, a large number of athletes participate in assessments and a large number of human hours are spent on playing out these assessments every year. These assessments are performed to check the physical strength of athletes and evaluate them for different games. This paper presents a machine learning approach to the physical assessment of athletes known as NueroFATH. The proposed NueroFATH approach relies on neuro-fuzzy analytics that involves the deployment of neural networks and fuzzy c-means techniques to predict the athletes for the potential of winning medals. This can be achieved using athletes’ physical assessment parameters. The goal of this study is not only to identify the athletes based on which group they fall into (gold/silver/bronze), but also to understand which physical characteristic is important to identify them and categorize them in a medal group. It was determined that features, namely height, body mass, body mass index, 40 m and vertical jump are the most important for achieving 98.40% accuracy for athletes to classify them in the gold category when they are in the bronze category. Unsupervised learning showed that features, namely body mass, body mass index, vertical jump, med ball, 40 m, peak oxygen content, peak height velocity have the highest variability. We can achieve upto 97.06% accuracy when features, i.e., body mass, body mass index, vertical jump, med ball, 40 m, peak oxygen content, peak height velocity were used.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11


  1. 1.

    D’Isanto T et al (2019) Assessment of sport performance: theoretical aspects and practical indications. Sport Mont 8(2):79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sanders B, Blackburn TA, Boucher B (2013) Preparticipation screening-the sports physical therapy perspective. Int J Sports Phys Ther 8(2):180

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rathore H, et al (2017) DLRT: deep learning approach for reliable diabetic treatment. In: GLOBECOM 2017–2017 IEEE global communications conference. IEEE, pp 1–6

  4. 4.

    Rathore H, et al (2019) A novel deep learning strategy for classifying different attack patterns for deep brain implants. IEEE Access

  5. 5.

    Rathore H, et al. (2018) Multi-layer security scheme for implantable medical devices. Neural Comput Appl 1–14

  6. 6.

    Aujla G, et al (2019) DLRS: deep learning-based recommender system for smart healthcare ecosystem. ICC 2019–2019 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6

  7. 7.

    Ling T et al (2019) Application of self-organizing feature map neural network based on K-means clustering in network intrusion detection. CMC-Comput Mater Cont 61(1):275–288

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sharma D et al (2019) Evolution from ancient medication to human-centered Healthcare 4.0: a review on health care recommender systems. Int J Commun Syst 86:105778

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Singh A et al (2020) Deep Learning-based SDN model for internet of things: an incremental tensor train approach. IEEE Internet Things J 7(7):6302–6311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Aujla G et al (2019) Optimal decision making for big data processing at edge-cloud environment: an SDN perspective. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(2):778–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Belayat H et al (2019) Surgical outcome prediction in total knee arthroplasty using machine learning. Intell Autom Soft Comput 25(1):105–115

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zou M et al (2019) Rigid medical image registration using learning-based interest points and features. CMC-Comput Mater Cont 60(2):511–525

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Humayun KM et al (2019) State-space based linear modeling for human activity recognition in smart space. Intell Autom Soft Comput 25(4):673–681

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zou J et al (2019) Non-contact real-time heart rate measurement algorithm based on PPG-standard deviation. CMC-Comput Mater Cont 60(3):1029–1040

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Garg S et al (2019) A hybrid deep learning-based model for anomaly detection in cloud datacenter networks. IEEE Trans Network Serv Manag 16(3):1029–1040

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ofoghi B, Zeleznikow J, MacMahon C, Dwyer D (2010) A machine learning approach to predicting winning patterns in track cycling omnium. In: IFIP international conference on artificial intelligence in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–76

  17. 17.

    Ofoghi B, Zeleznikow J, MacMahon C, Dwyer C (2013) Supporting athlete selection and strategic planning in track cycling omnium: a statistical and machine learning approach. Inf Sci 233:200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Edelmann-Nusser J, Hohmann A, Henneberg B (2002) Modeling and prediction of competitive performance in swimming upon neural networks. Eur J Sport Sci 2(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chen I, Homma H, Jin C, Yan H (2007) Identification of elite swimmers’ race patterns using cluster analysis. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2(3):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Flinders K (2002) Football injuries are rocket science, pp 10–14.

  21. 21.

    Bhandari I et al (1997) Advanced scout: data mining and knowledge discovery in NBA data. Data Min Knowl Discov 1(1):121–125

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Garg S et al (2019) Hybrid deep-learning-based anomaly detection scheme for suspicious flow detection in SDN: a social multimedia perspective. IEEE Trans Multimed 21(3):566–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Garg S et al (2018) Fuzzified cuckoo based clustering technique for network anomaly detection. Comput Electr Eng 71:798–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aspire Zone. Accessed 12 March 2018

  25. 25.

    Riedmiller M (1994) Advanced supervised learning in multi-layer perceptrons-from backpropagation to adaptive learning algorithms. Comput Stand Interfaces 16(3):265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rathore H et al (2018) Multi-layer perceptron model on chip for secure diabetic treatment. IEEE Access 6:44718–44730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 3(2):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Adeli H, Hung SL (1994) Machine learning: neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data

  31. 31.

    Heaton J (2008) Introduction to neural networks with Java. Heaton Research, Inc., Washington

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nejad MB et al (2019) A new enhanced learning approach to automatic image classification based on Salp Swarm Algorithm. Comput Syst Sci Eng 34(2):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rathore H, Badarla V, Jha S, Gupta A, (2014) Novel approach for security in wireless sensor network using bio-inspirations. In: 6th International conference on communication systems and networks (COMSNETS). IEEE, pp 1–8

  34. 34.

    Maamar A et al (2019) A hybrid model for anomalies detection in AMI system combining K-means clustering and deep neural network. Comput Mater Cont 60(1):15–39

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2–3):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chollet V (2015) Keras: theano-based deep learning library. Code Documentation

  37. 37.

    The Theano Development (2016) A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions. arXiv:1605.02688

  38. 38.

    Zhu M, Ghodsi A (2006) Automatic dimensionality selection from the scree plot via the use of profile likelihood. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51(2):918–930

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kodinariya TM, Makwana PR (2013) Review on determining number of cluster in K-means clustering. Int J 1(6):90–95

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ghosh S, Dubey SK (2013) Comparative analysis of k-means and fuzzy c-means algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 4(4):2013

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Richhariya B et al (2020) Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using universum support vector machine based recursive feature elimination (USVM-RFE). Biomed Signal Process Control 59:101903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ettensperger F (2020) Comparing supervised learning algorithms and artificial neural networks for conflict prediction: performance and applicability of deep learning in the field. Qual Quant 54(2):567–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Authors are thankful to Aspire Academy for providing the dataset which is used in this research study. This work was made possible by NPRP grant # NPRP12S-0305-190231 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The findings achieved herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heena Rathore.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or profes- sional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rathore, H., Mohamed, A., Guizani, M. et al. Neuro-fuzzy analytics in athlete development (NueroFATH): a machine learning approach. Neural Comput & Applic (2021).

Download citation


  • Neuro-fuzzy analytics
  • Machine learning
  • Multilayer perceptron model
  • Fuzzy c-means
  • Athletes