Athletes represent the apex of physical capacity filling in a social picture of performance and build. In light of the fundamental contrasts in athletic capacities required for different games, each game demands an alternate body type standard. Because of the decent variety of these body types, each can have an altogether different body standard. Nowadays, a large number of athletes participate in assessments and a large number of human hours are spent on playing out these assessments every year. These assessments are performed to check the physical strength of athletes and evaluate them for different games. This paper presents a machine learning approach to the physical assessment of athletes known as NueroFATH. The proposed NueroFATH approach relies on neuro-fuzzy analytics that involves the deployment of neural networks and fuzzy c-means techniques to predict the athletes for the potential of winning medals. This can be achieved using athletes’ physical assessment parameters. The goal of this study is not only to identify the athletes based on which group they fall into (gold/silver/bronze), but also to understand which physical characteristic is important to identify them and categorize them in a medal group. It was determined that features, namely height, body mass, body mass index, 40 m and vertical jump are the most important for achieving 98.40% accuracy for athletes to classify them in the gold category when they are in the bronze category. Unsupervised learning showed that features, namely body mass, body mass index, vertical jump, med ball, 40 m, peak oxygen content, peak height velocity have the highest variability. We can achieve upto 97.06% accuracy when features, i.e., body mass, body mass index, vertical jump, med ball, 40 m, peak oxygen content, peak height velocity were used.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
D’Isanto T et al (2019) Assessment of sport performance: theoretical aspects and practical indications. Sport Mont 8(2):79–82
Sanders B, Blackburn TA, Boucher B (2013) Preparticipation screening-the sports physical therapy perspective. Int J Sports Phys Ther 8(2):180
Rathore H, et al (2017) DLRT: deep learning approach for reliable diabetic treatment. In: GLOBECOM 2017–2017 IEEE global communications conference. IEEE, pp 1–6
Rathore H, et al (2019) A novel deep learning strategy for classifying different attack patterns for deep brain implants. IEEE Access
Rathore H, et al. (2018) Multi-layer security scheme for implantable medical devices. Neural Comput Appl 1–14
Aujla G, et al (2019) DLRS: deep learning-based recommender system for smart healthcare ecosystem. ICC 2019–2019 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6
Ling T et al (2019) Application of self-organizing feature map neural network based on K-means clustering in network intrusion detection. CMC-Comput Mater Cont 61(1):275–288
Sharma D et al (2019) Evolution from ancient medication to human-centered Healthcare 4.0: a review on health care recommender systems. Int J Commun Syst 86:105778
Singh A et al (2020) Deep Learning-based SDN model for internet of things: an incremental tensor train approach. IEEE Internet Things J 7(7):6302–6311
Aujla G et al (2019) Optimal decision making for big data processing at edge-cloud environment: an SDN perspective. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(2):778–789
Belayat H et al (2019) Surgical outcome prediction in total knee arthroplasty using machine learning. Intell Autom Soft Comput 25(1):105–115
Zou M et al (2019) Rigid medical image registration using learning-based interest points and features. CMC-Comput Mater Cont 60(2):511–525
Humayun KM et al (2019) State-space based linear modeling for human activity recognition in smart space. Intell Autom Soft Comput 25(4):673–681
Zou J et al (2019) Non-contact real-time heart rate measurement algorithm based on PPG-standard deviation. CMC-Comput Mater Cont 60(3):1029–1040
Garg S et al (2019) A hybrid deep learning-based model for anomaly detection in cloud datacenter networks. IEEE Trans Network Serv Manag 16(3):1029–1040
Ofoghi B, Zeleznikow J, MacMahon C, Dwyer D (2010) A machine learning approach to predicting winning patterns in track cycling omnium. In: IFIP international conference on artificial intelligence in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–76
Ofoghi B, Zeleznikow J, MacMahon C, Dwyer C (2013) Supporting athlete selection and strategic planning in track cycling omnium: a statistical and machine learning approach. Inf Sci 233:200–213
Edelmann-Nusser J, Hohmann A, Henneberg B (2002) Modeling and prediction of competitive performance in swimming upon neural networks. Eur J Sport Sci 2(2):1–10
Chen I, Homma H, Jin C, Yan H (2007) Identification of elite swimmers’ race patterns using cluster analysis. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2(3):293–303
Flinders K (2002) Football injuries are rocket science, pp 10–14. vnunet.com. http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2120386/football-injuries-rocketscience
Bhandari I et al (1997) Advanced scout: data mining and knowledge discovery in NBA data. Data Min Knowl Discov 1(1):121–125
Garg S et al (2019) Hybrid deep-learning-based anomaly detection scheme for suspicious flow detection in SDN: a social multimedia perspective. IEEE Trans Multimed 21(3):566–578
Garg S et al (2018) Fuzzified cuckoo based clustering technique for network anomaly detection. Comput Electr Eng 71:798–817
Aspire Zone. http://www.aspirezone.qa/index.aspx?lang=en. Accessed 12 March 2018
Riedmiller M (1994) Advanced supervised learning in multi-layer perceptrons-from backpropagation to adaptive learning algorithms. Comput Stand Interfaces 16(3):265–278
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436
Rathore H et al (2018) Multi-layer perceptron model on chip for secure diabetic treatment. IEEE Access 6:44718–44730
Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 3(2):95–99
Adeli H, Hung SL (1994) Machine learning: neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy systems. Wiley, New York
Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data
Heaton J (2008) Introduction to neural networks with Java. Heaton Research, Inc., Washington
Nejad MB et al (2019) A new enhanced learning approach to automatic image classification based on Salp Swarm Algorithm. Comput Syst Sci Eng 34(2):91–100
Rathore H, Badarla V, Jha S, Gupta A, (2014) Novel approach for security in wireless sensor network using bio-inspirations. In: 6th International conference on communication systems and networks (COMSNETS). IEEE, pp 1–8
Maamar A et al (2019) A hybrid model for anomalies detection in AMI system combining K-means clustering and deep neural network. Comput Mater Cont 60(1):15–39
Bezdek JC, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2–3):191–203
The Theano Development (2016) A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions. arXiv:1605.02688
Zhu M, Ghodsi A (2006) Automatic dimensionality selection from the scree plot via the use of profile likelihood. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51(2):918–930
Kodinariya TM, Makwana PR (2013) Review on determining number of cluster in K-means clustering. Int J 1(6):90–95
Ghosh S, Dubey SK (2013) Comparative analysis of k-means and fuzzy c-means algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 4(4):2013
Richhariya B et al (2020) Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using universum support vector machine based recursive feature elimination (USVM-RFE). Biomed Signal Process Control 59:101903
Ettensperger F (2020) Comparing supervised learning algorithms and artificial neural networks for conflict prediction: performance and applicability of deep learning in the field. Qual Quant 54(2):567–601
Authors are thankful to Aspire Academy for providing the dataset which is used in this research study. This work was made possible by NPRP grant # NPRP12S-0305-190231 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The findings achieved herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or profes- sional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rathore, H., Mohamed, A., Guizani, M. et al. Neuro-fuzzy analytics in athlete development (NueroFATH): a machine learning approach. Neural Comput & Applic (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05704-5
- Neuro-fuzzy analytics
- Machine learning
- Multilayer perceptron model
- Fuzzy c-means