Abstract
Domain knowledge graph has become a research topic in the era of artificial intelligence. Knowledge representation is the key step to construct domain knowledge graph. There have been quite a few well-established general knowledge graphs. However, there are still gaps on the domain knowledge graph construction. The research introduces the related concepts of the knowledge representation and analyzes knowledge representation of knowledge graphs by category, which includes some classical general knowledge graphs and several typical domain knowledge graphs. The paper also discusses the development of knowledge representation in accordance with the difference of entities, relationships and properties. It also presents the unsolved problems and future research trends in the knowledge representation of domain knowledge graph study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jue W, Xiaohong Y, Chunyi S, Jigang H (1995) Discussions on knowledge representation. Chin J Comput 18(3):212–224
Yanghua X (2018) Problems and measures in the implementation of domain knowledge graph. https://blog.csdn.net/xinshucredit/article/details/84852877. Accessed 14 Apr 2020
Shan F, Ailin L, Shu Y (2019) The concept and application of knowledge graph. Inf Commun Technol Policy 299(05):17–20
Development Report of Knowledge Graph in 2018 (2018) Chinese Information Processing Society of China
Xu/Shi/Quan et al (2017) The most comprehensive review of knowledge graph: concept and construction technology (TUG). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bhk6iZdphif74HJlyUZOBQ. Accessed 05 Jan 2020
Jun Z (2018) Knowledge graph. Higher Education Press, Beijing
Miller GA (1995) WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun Assoc Comput Mach 38(11):39–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748
Miller GA, Beckwith R, Fellbaum C et al (1990) Introduction to WordNet: an on-line lexical database*. Int J Lexicogr 3(4):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.235
Tianshun Y, Li Z, Zhu G (2001) Introduction of WordNet. Appl Linguist 1:27–32
Lenat DB (1995) CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun ACM 38(11):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219745
Speer R, Havasi C (2012) Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. In: LREC, pp 3679–3686
Zhao J, Sun N (2020) Government subsidies-based profits distribution pattern analysis in closed-loop supply chain using game theory. Neural Comput Appl 32:1715–1724
Gupta P, Sharma TK, Mehrotra D et al (2019) Knowledge building through optimized classification rule set generation using genetic based elitist multi objective approach. Neural Comput Appl 31:845–855
Xu Z, Zhang H, Hu C, Mei L, Xuan J, Choo K-KR, Sugumaran V, Zhu Y (2016) Building knowledge base of urban emergency events based on crowd sourcing of social media. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 28(15):4038–4052
Najmi E, Hashmi K, Malik Z, et al (2014) ConceptOnto: an upper ontology based on ConceptNet. In: IEEE/ACS international conference on computer systems & applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2014.7073222
Liu H, Singh P (2004) ConceptNet: a practical commonsense reasoning tool-kit. BT Technol J 22(4):211–226. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047600.45421.6d
Commonsense Computing Initiative (2020) ConceptNet. http://www.conceptnet.io/. Accessed 22 Dec 2019
Speer R, Havasi C (2013) ConceptNet 5: a large semantic network for relational knowledge. In: Gurevych I, Kim J (eds) The people’s web meets NLP. Theory and applications of natural language processing. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35085-6_6
Europeana (2020) Linked open data. https://pro.europeana.eu/page/linked-open-data. Accessed 20 Mar 2020
Vrandecic D, Krtoetzsch M (2014) Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledge base. Commun ACM 57(10):78–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629489
F.M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, G. Weikum (2007) YAGO: a core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Canada, pp 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242667
Singhal A (2012) Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings. https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2020
Bollacker KD, Evans C, Paritosh P, et al (2008) Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD 2008, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 10–12 June, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1376616.1376746
Hoffart J, Suchanek FM, Berberich K et al (2013) YAGO2: a spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artif Intell 194:28–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.001
Suchanek FM, Kasneci G, Weikum AG (2008) Yago: a large ontology from Wikipedia and WordNet. J Web Semant 6(3):203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2008.06.001
Ringler D, Paulheim H (2017) One knowledge graph to rule them all? Analyzing the differences between DBpedia, YAGO, Wikidata & Co. In: Kern-Isberner G, Fürnkranz J, Thimm M (eds) KI 2017: advances in artificial intelligence. KI 2017. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10505. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67190-1_33
Uyar A, Aliyu FM (2015) Evaluating search features of Google knowledge graph and bing satori entity types, list searches and query interfaces. Online Inf Rev 39(2):197–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2014-0257
Bollacker K, Cook R, Tufts P (2007) Freebase: a shared database of structured general human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 22–26 July 2007, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2007/AAAI07-355.pdf
Jun L (2011) Research on semantic database freebase. New Technol Libr Inf Serv 27(10):18–23
Bin W, Jial F (2013) Further study in freebase with property coordinate system theory. Microcomput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1145/176789.176804
Yifeng R (2008) Research on freebase (TUG), http://www.ruanyifeng.com/blog/2008/04/freebase_reloaded.html. Accessed 26 Dec 2019
Danzhuzhu (2013) Introduction to freebase (TUG). http://blog.maidou.info/?p=169. Accessed 26 Dec 2019
Creative Commons (2020) GeoName. http://www.geonames.org/. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Bukun (2016) Introduction to the global geographic names database, GeoName. https://www.osgeo.cn/post/04b2. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Wei Yong H, Danlu LX, Fei W (2016) Geographic name full text query based GeoNames and Solr. Eng Surv Mapp 25(2):28–32
GeoNames (2020) Datasources used by GeoNames in the GeoNames Gazettee. http://www.geonames.org/data-sources.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Uche Ogbuji (2008) Open geographic information systems at Geonames.org. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/web/wa-realweb7/. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Maltese V, Farazi F (2013) A semantic schema for GeoNames. In: INSPIRE 2013
Ahlers D (2013) Assessment of the accuracy of GeoNames gazetteer data. Workshop on geographic information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/2533888.2533938
Yang YJ, Xu B, Hu JW, Tong MH, Zhang P, Zheng L (2018) Accurate and efficient method for constructing domain knowledge graph. J Softw 29(10):2931–2947. https://doi.org/10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005552
World Health Organization (2018) ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics (ICD-11 MMS) 2018 version. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en. Accessed 1 Apr 2020
Zhou S, Luo P, Jain DK, Lan X, Zhang Y (2019) Double-domain imaging and adaption for person re-identification. IEEE Access 7:103336–103345
NML (2019) Unified medical language system. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/index.html. Accessed 01 Apr 2020
Lirong J, Jing L, Tong Y et al (2015) Construction of traditional Chinese medicine knowledge graph. J Med Intell 2015(8):51–53
Tong R, Chenglin S, Haofen W et al (2016) Construction of traditional Chinese medicine knowledge graph and its application. J Med Inform 37(4):8–14
Dezheng Z, Yonghong X, Man L, Chuan S (2017) Construction of knowledge graph of traditional Chinese medicine based on the ontology. Technol Intell Eng 3(1):035–042. https://doi.org/10.3772/j.issn.95-915x.2017.01.004
Odmaa BYAMBASUREN, Yunfei YANG, Zhifang SUI, Damai DAI, Baobao CHANG, Sujian LI, Hongying ZAN (2019) Preliminary study on the construction of Chinese medical knowledge graph. J Chin Inf Process 33(10):1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040186
The Institute of Computational Linguistics, Peking University, et al (2018) CMeKG2.0. http://zstp.pcl.ac.cn:8002/. Accessed 02 Apr 2020
Ali (2013) E-commerce semantic base. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/1f20d94a43323968001c9254.html. Accessed 05 Apr 2020
Zhou S, Ke M, Luo P (2019) Multi-camera transfer GAN for person re-identification. J Vis Commun Image Represent 59:393–400
Shengchun D, Linlin H, Ying W (2019) Product knowledge map construction based on the e-commerce data. Data Anal Knowl Discov. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021800141951008X
Da X, Chuanwei R, Korpeoglu E, Kumar S, Achan K (2019) Product knowledge graph embedding for e-commerce. arXiv:1911.12481
Ali Technology (2018) The knowledge graph born for e-commerce, how to respond to user demand (TUG). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/RoiIHPCV3vXAH_sUHhTOYw. Accessed 29 Dec 2019
Xusheng L, Yonghua Y, Zhu KQ, Yu G, Keping Y (2018) Conceptualize and infer user needs in e-commerce. In: The 28th ACM international conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3357812
Bordes A, Weston J, Collobert R, et al (2011) Learning structured embeddings of knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of AAAI. AAAI, Menlo Park, pp 301–306
Bordes A, Usunier N, Garcia-Duran A, et al (2013) Translating embeddings for modeling multirelational data. In: Proceedings of NIPS. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 2787–2795
Zhiyuan L, Maosong S, Yankai L, Ruobing X (2016) Knowledge representation learning: a review. J Comput Res Dev 53(2):247–261
Acknowledgements
Teaching Reform Research Project of Undergraduate Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province (Z2016Z036), the Teaching Reform Research Project of Shandong University of Finance and Economics (jy2018062891470, jy201830, jy201810), Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning Research Project (18CHLJ08), Scientific Research Projects of Universities in Shandong Province (J18RA136), Youth Innovative on Science and Technology Project of Shandong Province (2019RWF013), SDUST Excellent Teaching Team Construction Plan (JXTD20160512 and JXTD20180510), Jinan campus of SDUST Excellent Teaching Team Construction Plan (JNJXTD201711), Teaching research project of Shandong University of Science and Technology (JNJG2017104), National Natural Science Foundation of China (61703243).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interests of this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, J., Zhao, Y., Huang, W. et al. Domain knowledge graph-based research progress of knowledge representation. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 681–690 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05057-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05057-5