Discovering the realistic paths towards the realization of patent valuation from technical perspectives: defense, implementation or transfer


With the intense competition of global intellectual property, the number of authorized patents is increasing. However, the patent conversion rate is low and the patent valuation is hard. The realization of patent valuation faces some basic challenges including: (1) how to develop a patent valuation model in consideration of technical factors; (2) how to train/test the patent valuation model with the insufficient standard value data. To solve the above issues, we assume that the realization of patent valuation begins with selecting the realistic value-paths: defense, implementation or transfer. We explore a Bayesian neural network-based model to predict the paths toward the realization of patent valuation. In the model, a function-effect-based patent representation is proposed, from which some technical features are extracted. Given the patent features, we use Bayesian neural network to predict the value-paths toward the realization of patent valuation. The model is evaluated by precision, recall, F-measure. The results show our method can improve evaluation measurements significantly after the addition of technical features.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16


  1. 1.

  2. 2.

  3. 3.

  4. 4.


  1. 1.

    Agrawal R, Srikant R et al (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on very large data bases, VLDB, vol 1215, pp 487–499

  2. 2.

    Allison JR, Lemley MA, Moore KA, Trunkey RD (2003) Valuable patents. Geo Lj 92:435

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bass S, Kurgan L (2009) Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 82(2):217–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Denton FR, Heald PJ (2002) Random walks, non-cooperative games, and the complex mathematics of patent pricing. Rutgers L Rev 55:1175

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de Saint-Georges M, de la Potterie BP (2013) A quality index for patent systems. Res Policy 42(3):704–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ercan S, Kayakutlu G (2014) Patent value analysis using support vector machines. Soft Comput 18(2):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fischer T, Leidinger J (2014) Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent valuetion: an empirical analysis of ocean tomo patent auctions. Res Policy 43(3):519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gal Y, Ghahramani Z (2015) Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:150602142

  9. 9.

    Gal Y, Ghahramani Z (2016) Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International conference on machine learning, pp 1050–1059

  10. 10.

    Garson DG (1991) Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI Expert 6(4):46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Grimaldi M, Cricelli L (2019) Indexes of patent value: a systematic literature review and classification. Knowl Manag Res Pract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Han EJ, Sohn SY (2015) Patent valuation based on text mining and survival analysis. J Technol Transf 40(5):821–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hernández-Lobato JM, Adams R (2015) Probabilistic backpropagation for scalable learning of bayesian neural networks. In: International conference on machine learning, pp 1861–1869

  14. 14.

    Lemley MA, Shapiro C (2005) Probabilistic patents. J Econ Perspect 19(2):75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lin H, Wang H, Du D, Wu H, Chang B, Chen E (2018) Patent quality valuation with deep learning models. In: International conference on database systems for advanced applications, Springer, New York, pp 474–490

  16. 16.

    Liu S, Liu G, Zhou H (2019) A robust parallel object tracking method for illumination variations. Mobile Netw Appl 24(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu S, Guo C, Al-Turjman F, Muhammad K, de Albuquerque VHC (2020) Reliability of response region: a novel mechanism in visual tracking by edge computing for iiot environments. Mech Syst Signal Process 138:106537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liu X, Yan J, Xiao S, Wang X, Zha H, Chu SM (2017) On predictive patent valuation: forecasting patent citations and their types. In: Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

  19. 19.

    Liu Y, Hseuh P, Lawrence R, Meliksetian S, Perlich C, Veen A (2011) Latent graphical models for quantifying and predicting patent quality. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 1145–1153

  20. 20.

    Munari F, Oriani R (2011) The economic valuation of patents: methods and applications. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Murphy WJ, Orcutt JL, Remus PC (2012) Patent valuation: improving decision making through analysis, vol 571. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Neal RM (2012) Bayesian learning for neural networks, vol 118. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Suzuki J (2011) Structural modeling of the value of patent. Res Policy 40(7):986–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Thoma G (2014) Composite value index of patent indicators: factor analysis combining bibliographic and survey datasets. World Patent Inf 38:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang S, Lei Z, Lee WC (2014) Exploring legal patent citations for patent valuation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, pp 1379–1388

Download references


The research work in this paper was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61801251) and Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2018BS06002).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Qiao, W. & Liu, X. Discovering the realistic paths towards the realization of patent valuation from technical perspectives: defense, implementation or transfer. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 577–590 (2021).

Download citation


  • Neural network
  • Patent valuation
  • Path prediction