On robustness of radial basis function network with input perturbation
- 51 Downloads
In this article, we have proposed a methodology for making a radial basis function network (RBFN) robust with respect to additive and multiplicative input noises. This is achieved by properly selecting the centers and widths for the radial basis function (RBF) units of the hidden layer. For this purpose, firstly, a set of self-organizing map (SOM) networks are trained for center selection. For training a SOM network, random Gaussian noise is injected in the samples of each class of the data set. The number of SOM networks is same as the number of classes present in the data set, and each of the SOM networks is trained separately by the samples belonging to a particular class. The weight vector associated with a unit in the output layer of a particular SOM network corresponding to a class is used as the center of a RBF unit for that class. To determine the widths of the RBF units, p-nearest neighbor algorithm is used class-wise. Proper selection of centers and widths makes the RBFN robust with respect to input perturbation and outliers present in the data set. The weights between the hidden and output layers of RBFN are obtained by pseudo inverse method. To test the robustness of the proposed method in additive and multiplicative noise scenarios, ten standard data sets have been used for classification. Proposed method has been compared with three existing methods, where the centers have been generated in three ways: randomly, using k-means algorithm, and based on SOM network. Simulation results show the superiority of the proposed method compared to those methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank test also shows that the proposed method is statistically better than those methods.
KeywordsAdditive noise Gaussian noise Multiplicative noise Radial basis function network Robustness Self-organizing map
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We have tried our best to minimize the overlap between this manuscript and published articles for fragments of sentences and technical terms. We do not have any conflict of interest with others.
- 5.Haykin S, Network N (2004) A comprehensive foundation. Neural Netw 2:2004Google Scholar
- 17.Cohen S, Intrator N (2000) Global optimization of RBF networks. http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~nin/papers/rbf.pdf (cf. p. 156)
- 21.Bouchired S, Ibnkahla M, Roviras D, Castanié F (1998) Equalization of satellite mobile communication channels using combined self-organizing maps and RBF networks. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, 1998, vol 6. IEEE, pp 3377–3379Google Scholar
- 25.Lee CC, Chung PC, Tsai JR, Chang CI (1999) Robust radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 29(6):674–685Google Scholar
- 28.Tinós R, Terra MH (2001) Fault detection and isolation in robotic manipulators using a multilayer perceptron and a rbf network trained by the Kohonen’s self-organizing map. Rev Soc Bras Autom Contr Autom 12(1):11–18Google Scholar
- 31.Tu S, Ben K, Tian L, Zhang L (2008) Combination of SOM and RBF based on incremental learning for acoustic fault identification of underwater vehicles. In: Congress on image and signal processing, 2008 (CISP’08), vol 4. IEEE, pp 38–42Google Scholar
- 38.Frank A, Asuncion A (2010) UCI machine learning repository, vol 213. University of California, IrvineGoogle Scholar