Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 609–617 | Cite as

A design reuse technology to increase productivity through automated corporate memory system

  • Murat Gunduz
  • Tamer Yetisir
Original Article


Increasing competitiveness in engineering industry pressurizes companies to improve productivity of every single element in processes. As a result of this pressure, increasing productivity of design staff and design systems is systematically investigated by industry professionals and researchers. Design reuse appears as an effective approach to increase productivity levels. It has been already used personally by designers consciously or subconsciously. This paper proposes a computer-based design reuse methodology developed with the purpose of efficient corporate memory usage. The paper focused on steel construction infrastructure design process; however, its approach can be easily implemented in different engineering design processes.


Design reuse Corporate memory Integration Construction industry Last check mechanism 


  1. 1.
    Bai J, Gao S, Tang W, Liu Y, Guo S (2010) Design reuse oriented partial retrieval of CAD models. CAD Comput Aided Des 42(12):1069–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2010.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benmiled A, Bakhouya M (2013) A framework for knowledge reuse in product design and development process. Int J Metadata Semant Ontol 8(3):206–214. doi: 10.1504/IJMSO.2013.057766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brunsmann J, Wilkes W (2009) Enabling product design reuse by long-term preservation of engineering knowledge. Int J Dig Curation 3(4):17–28. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v4i3.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costa CA, Luciano MA, Lima CP, Young RIM (2012) Assessment of a product range model concept to support design reuse using rule based systems and case based reasoning. Adv Eng Inform 26(2):292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2011.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Culley S (1999) Classification approaches for standard parts to aid design reuse. J Eng Manuf 213(2):203–207. doi: 10.1243/0954405991517371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demian P, Fruchter R (2005) Measuring relevance in support of design reuse from archives of building product models. J Comput Civ Eng 19(2):119–136. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19:2(119) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Demian P, Fruchter R (2006) Methodology for usability evaluation of corporate memory design reuse systems. J Comput Civ Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2006)20:6(377) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demian P, Fruchter R (2006) An ethnographic study of design knowledge reuse in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Res Eng Des 16(4):184–195. doi: 10.1007/s00163-006-0010-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Demian P, Fruchter R (2006) Finding and understanding reusable designs from large hierarchical repositories. Inf Vis 5(1):28–46. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Efthymiou K, Sipsas K, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2015) On knowledge reuse for manufacturing systems design and planning: a semantic technology approach (2015). CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 8:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fruchter R, Demian P (2002) CoMem: designing an interaction experience for reuse of rich contextual knowledge from a corporate memory. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 16(3):127–147. doi: 10.1017/S0890060402163025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girczyc E, Carlson S (1993) Increasing design quality and engineering productivity through design reuse. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM/IEEE design automation conference, Dallas, pp 48–53. doi: 10.1145/157485.164565
  13. 13.
    Gray PMD, Runcie T, Sleeman D (2015) Reuse of constraint knowledge bases and problem solvers explored in engineering design. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 29(1):1–18. doi: 10.1017/S0890060414000134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang Y, Jiang Z, He C, Liu J, Song B, Liu L (2015) A semantic-based visualised wiki system (SVWkS) for lesson-learned knowledge reuse situated in product design. Int J Prod Res 53(8):2524–2541. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.975861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang C-C, Chuang H-F, Chen S-Y (2016) Corporate memory: design to better reduce, reuse and recycle. Comput Ind Eng 91:48–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ren Z, Anumba CJ, Yang F (2013) Development of CDPM matrix for the measurement of collaborative design performance in construction. Autom Constr 32:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shah JJ, Jeon DK, Urban SD, Bliznakov P, Rogers M (1996) Database infrastructure for supporting engineering design histories. Comput Aided Des 28(5):347–360. doi: 10.1016/0010-4485(95)00054-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sundaravadivelu S, Vaidyanathan A, Ramaswamy S (2014) Knowledge reuse of software architecture design decisions and rationale within the enterprise. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on issues and challenges in intelligent computing techniques, ICICT 2014, Art. No. 6781289, pp 253–261. doi: 10.1109/ICICICT.2014.6781289
  19. 19.
    Tan HC, Carrillo PM, Anumba CJ, Bouclaghem N, Kamara JM, Udeaja CE (2007) Development of a methodology for live capture and reuse of project knowledge in construction. J Manag Eng 23(1):18–26. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:1(18) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu J, Cha J, Lu Y (2012) Design synthesis approach based on process decomposition to design reuse. J Eng Des 23(7):526–543. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2011.629316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang X, Peng G, Hou X, Zhuang T (2014) A knowledge reuse-based computer-aided fixture design framework. Assem Autom 34(2):169–181. doi: 10.1108/AA-04-2013-033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Civil EngineerDorce CompanyAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations