The mediating effect of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice in the relationship of pain on health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors

Abstract

Background

The importance of cognitive appraisals in the effectiveness of pain coping is well established. Two key variables in these appraisal processes are pain catastrophizing (PC) and perceived injustice (PI), which are known to increase the risk of long-term disability and aggravate the pain-related distress through maladaptive behavioral responses. However, to date, the mediating effects of these appraisals have not been examined concurrently in the breast cancer survivor (BCS) population, nor have they been related to health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods

Using cross-sectional data from 110 BCS, structural path analyses were used to examine the mediating effects of PC and PI in the relationship of pain on the HRQoL in BCS.

Results

Results demonstrated a significant direct effect of pain and PI on HRQoL combined with a significant indirect effect through PI, but not through PC. An increase in pain is suggested to result in a decrease in quality of life. On the other hand, an increase in pain also is suggested to increase the PI. A similar relation with PC was not retained as significant.

Conclusion

The relative salience of PI as a mediator of HRQoL underscores the fact that PI is not only understudied but also underappreciated and undertreated in the BCS population. The results of our study warrant replication across longitudinal studies but continue to expand upon the evidence of the multifactorial nature of pain coping in BCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, Nur U, Tracey E, Coory M, Hatcher J, McGahan C, Turner D, Marrett L, Gjerstorff ML, Johannesen TB, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Lawrence G, Meechan D, Morris EJ, Middleton R, Steward J, Richards MA, ICBP Module 1 Working Group (2011) Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 377(9760):127–138

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Befort CA, Klemp J (2011) Sequelae of breast cancer and the influence of menopausal status at diagnosis among rural breast cancer survivors. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 20(9):1307–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Burckhardt CS, Jones KD (2005) Effects of chronic widespread pain on the health status and quality of life of women after breast cancer surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:30

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Turk DC, Okifuji A (2002) Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 70(3):678–690

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Esteve R, Ramirez-Maestre C, Lopez-Marinez AE (2007) Adjustment to chronic pain: the role of pain acceptance, coping strategies, and pain-related cognitions. Ann Behav Med 33(2):179–188

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sullivan MJ et al (2001) Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain 17(1):52–64

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Westman AE, Boersma K, Leppert J, Linton SJ (2011) Fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and distress: a longitudinal subgroup analysis on patients with musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 27(7):567–577

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Leeuw M, Goossens MEJB, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS (2007) The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 30(1):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Edwards RR, Mensing G, Cahalan C, Greenbaum S, Narang S, Belfer I, Schreiber KL, Campbell C, Wasan AD, Jamison RN (2013) Alteration in pain modulation in women with persistent pain after lumpectomy: influence of catastrophizing. J Pain Symptom Manag 46(1):30–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schreiber KL, Martel MO, Shnol H, Shaffer JR, Greco C, Viray N, Taylor LN, McLaughlin M, Brufsky A, Ahrendt G, Bovbjerg D, Edwards RR, Belfer I (2013) Persistent pain in postmastectomy patients: comparison of psychophysical, medical, surgical, and psychosocial characteristics between patients with and without pain. Pain 154(5):660–668

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sullivan MJ, Scott W, Trost Z (2012) Perceived injustice: a risk factor for problematic pain outcomes. Clin J Pain 28(6):484–488

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118(8):622–629

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Svensson H, Hatschek T, Johansson H, Einbeigi Z, Brandberg Y (2012) Health-related quality of life as prognostic factor for response, progression-free survival, and survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Med Oncol 29(2):432–438

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nguyen J, Popovic M, Chow E, Cella D, Beaumont JL, Chu D, DiGiovanni J, Lam H, Pulenzas N, Bottomley A (2015) EORTC QLQ-BR23 and FACT-B for the assessment of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a literature review. J Comp Eff Res 4(2):157–166

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 18(4):1007–1019

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W (2002) Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 20(4):287–290

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    van Seventer R, Vos C, Giezeman M, Meerding WJ, Arnould B, Regnault A, van Eerd M, Martin C, Huygen F (2013) Validation of the Dutch version of the DN4 diagnostic questionnaire for neuropathic pain. Pain Pract 13(5):390–398

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Perez C, Galvez R, Huelbes S, Insausti J, Bouhassira D, Diaz S, Rejas J (2007) Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions) questionnaire for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes associated to a neuropathic or somatic component. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:66

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Neblett R, Cohen H, Choi YH, Hartzell MM, Williams M, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (2013) The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): establishing clinically significant values for identifying central sensitivity syndromes in an outpatient chronic pain sample. J Pain 14(5):438–445

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, Howard KJ, Choi YH, Williams MJ, Perez Y, Gatchel RJ (2012) The development and psychometric validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract 12(4):276–285

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, Haes JCJM, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Scott NW, Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, EORTC Quality of Life Group (2008) EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values manual

  25. 25.

    Kapoor S, Thorn BE, Bandy O, Clements KL (2015) Pain referents used to respond to the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Eur J Pain 19(3):400–407

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Osman A, Barrios FX, Gutierrez PM, Kopper BA, Merrifield T, Grittmann L (2000) The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med 23(4):351–365

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sullivan M (2008) User manual for the Injustice Experience Questionnaire

  28. 28.

    Rodero B, Luciano JV, Montero-Marín J, Casanueva B, Palacin JC, Gili M, López del Hoyo Y, Serrano-Blanco A, Garcia-Campayo J (2012) Perceived injustice in fibromyalgia: psychometric characteristics of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire and relationship with pain catastrophising and pain acceptance. J Psychosom Res 73(2):86–91

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sullivan MJ, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R (2008) The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil 18(3):249–261

  30. 30.

    Mukaka MM (2012) Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24(3):69–71

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mackinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav Res 39(1):99–128

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Miller MM, Scott EL, Trost Z, Hirsh AT (2016) Perceived injustice is associated with pain and functional outcomes in children and adolescents with chronic pain: a preliminary examination. J Pain 17(11):1217–1226

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE (1999) Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 48(11):1507–1515

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Breetvelt IS, Van Dam FS (1991) Underreporting by cancer patients: the case of response-shift. Soc Sci Med 32(9):981–987

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sprangers MA (1996) Response-shift bias: a challenge to the assessment of patients’ quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev 22 Suppl A:55–62

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ (2000) Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85(3):317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Scott W, Trost Z, Bernier E, Sullivan MJL (2013) Anger differentially mediates the relationship between perceived injustice and chronic pain outcomes. Pain 154(9):1691–1698

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sturgeon JA, Carriere JS, Kao MCJ, Rico T, Darnall BD, Mackey SC (2016) Social disruption mediates the relationship between perceived injustice and anger in chronic pain: a collaborative health outcomes information registry study. Ann Behav Med 50(6):802–812

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Monden KR, Trost Z, Scott W, Bogart KR, Driver S (2016) The unfairness of it all: exploring the role of injustice appraisals in rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Psychol 61(1):44–53

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ (1999) The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 48(8):977–988

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lynch EB, Butt Z, Heinemann A, Victorson D, Nowinski CJ, Perez L, Cella D (2008) A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. J Rehabil Med 40(7):518–523

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Turk D, Meichenbaum D, Genest M (1983) Pain and behavioral medicine: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Burns JW, Quartana PJ, Bruehl S (2008) Anger inhibition and pain: conceptualizations, evidence and new directions. J Behav Med 31(3):259–279

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Vowles K, McCracken L, Eccleston C (2012) Processes of change in treatment for chronic pain: the contributions of pain, acceptance, and catastrophizing. Eur J Pain 11(7):779–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Suen LJ, Huang HM, Lee HH (2014) A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Hu Li Za Zhi 61(3):105–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Jo Nijs is holder of a Chair funded by the Berekuyl Academy, the Netherlands. Roselien Pas is a PhD student funded by the Berekuyl Academy Chair.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.L., J.N., C.P.V.W., R.B., and D.B. conceived the presented idea. L.L., J.N., and D.B. developed the study protocol and L.L. carried out the study. W.C. performed and verified the analytical methods. L.L. wrote the manuscript with support from J.N., D.B., and W.C. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Leysen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The protocol B.U.N. 143201524229 was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Brussels.

Consent to participate

Written and signed consents were obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of the manuscript in JSSC, should the article be accepted by the Editor-in-chief upon completion of the refereeing process.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Code availability

N/A

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leysen, L., Cools, W., Nijs, J. et al. The mediating effect of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice in the relationship of pain on health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06011-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pain catastrophizing
  • Perceived injustice
  • Pain
  • Quality of life
  • Breast cancer survivors