Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term implications of autologous HCT for caregiver quality of life: how does the survivor’s health matter?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study examines caregiver quality of life (CQOL) 3–26 years after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with lymphoma. Using a framework that views the patient-caregiver dyad as a system of mutual influence, we argue that CQOL is associated with survivor functional health status and sense of personal control.

Methods

Ninety-nine autologous HCT survivor-caregiver dyads participated. CQOL was measured using the Caregiver Quality of Life Scale-Cancer. Survivor functional health status was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General. Sense of control was examined using an instrument from the MIDUS II study. Clinical measures were collected from medical records.

Results

After controlling for sociodemographic and clinical covariates, caregivers with higher sense of control had higher CQOL. Poorer survivor functional health was associated with lower CQOL but only when the survivor reported low personal control. When the survivor reported high personal control, functional health was not a factor. Lower CQOL was observed for younger and more educated caregivers. In contrast, more education among survivors was linked to higher CQOL.

Conclusion

These results (1) support using a mutuality framework for the study of long-term outcomes of caregivers, (2) suggest the importance of ongoing support for caregivers, and (3) help identify caregivers at risk for poorer adaptation. Poorer survivor functional health is a risk factor, but its adverse implications can be offset by higher caregiver and survivor sense of control, a psychological resource aiding caregiver adaptation. These findings can inform the development of support programs for long-term caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. David KA, Mauro L, Evens AM (2007) Relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: transplantation strategies and novel therapeutic options. Curr Treat Options Oncol 8:352–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wrench D, Gribben JG (2008) Stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 22:1051–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster LW, McLellan LJ, Rybicki LA, Sassano DA, Hsu A, Bolwell BJ (2005) Survival of patients who have undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: the relative importance of in-hospital lay care-partner support. J Psychosoc Oncol 22:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wadhwa D, Burman D, Swami N, Rodin G, Lo C, Zimmermann C (2013) Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology 22:403–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Von AD, Spath M, Nielsen A, Fife B (2016) The caregiver’s role across the bone marrow transplantation trajectory. Cancer Nurs 39:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foxall MJ, Gaston-Johansson F (1996) Burden and health outcomes of family caregivers of hospitalized bone marrow transplant patients. J Adv Nurs 24:915–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li QP, Mak YW, Loke AY (2013) Spouses' experience of caregiving for cancer patients: a literature review. Int Nurs Rev 60:178–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop MM, Beaumont JL, Hahn EA, Cella D, Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ, Horowitz MM, Sobocinski KA, Rizzo JD, Wingard JR (2007) Late effects of cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on spouses or partners compared with survivors and survivor-matched controls. Jpn J Clin Oncol 25:1403–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Langer SL (2003) Mood disturbance in the cancer setting: effects of gender and patient/spouse role. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry 8:276–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fife BL, Monahan PO, Abonour R, Wood LL, Stump TE (2009) Adaptation of family caregivers during the acute phase of adult BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 43:959–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyle D, Blodgett L, Gnesdiloff S, White J, Bamford AM, Sheridan M, Beveridge R (2000) Caregiver quality of life after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Nurs 23:193–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Syrjala KL, Langer SL, Abrams JR, Storer BE, Martin PJ (2005) Late effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation among 10-year adult survivors compared with casematched controls. Jpn J Clin Oncol 23:6596–6606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bilmon IA, Ashton LJ, Le Marsney RE et al (2014) Second cancer risk in adults receiving autologous haematopoietic SCT for cancer: a population-based cohort study. Bone Marrow Transplant 49:691–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Given CW, Given BA (2004) Depression and physical health among family caregivers of geriatric patients with cancer—a longitudinal view. Med Sci Monit 10:447–456

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, Spillers RL, Kaw CK, Smith TG (2008) Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med 35:230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher BAS, Schumacher KL, Dodd M, Paul SM, Cooper BA, Lee K, West C, Aouizerat BE, Swift PS, Wara W, Miaskowski C (2009) Trajectories of fatigue in family caregivers of patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Res Nurs Health 32:125–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherwood PR, Given BA, Given CW, Schiffman RF, Murman DL, Lovely M, von Eye A, Rogers LR, Remer S (2006) Predictors of distress in caregivers of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor. Res Nurs Health 29:105–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen ML, Chu L, Chen HC (2004) Impact of cancer patients’ quality of life on that of spouse caregivers. Support Care Cancer 12(7):469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fletcher BS, Miaskowski C, Given B, Schumacher K (2012) The cancer family caregiving experience: an updated and expanded conceptual model. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16:387–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Q, Loke AY (2014) A literature review on the mutual impact of the spousal caregiver–cancer patients dyads: ‘communication’, ‘reciprocal influence’, and ‘caregiver–patient congruence’. Eur J Oncol Nurs 18:58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Langer SL, Brown JD, Syrjala KL (2009) Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and caregivers. Cancer 115:4311–4325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lachman ME, Weaver SL (1998) The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:763–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zebb BJ, Beck JG (1998) Worry versus anxiety: is there really a difference? Behav Modif 22:45–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laudenslager ML, Ryan SM, Drugan RC, Hyson RL, Maier SF (1983) Coping and immunosuppression: inescapable but not escapable shock suppresses lymphocyte proliferation. Science 221:568–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seeman M, Seeman TE (1983) Health behavior and personal autonomy: a longitudinal study of the sense of control in illness. J Health Soc Behav 24:44–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller B, Campbell RT, Farran CJ, Kaufman JE, Davis L (1995) Race, control, mastery, and caregiver distress. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50:374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaugler JE, Hanna N, Linder J, Given CW, Tolbert V, Kataria R, Regine WF (2005) Cancer caregiving and subjective stress: a multi-site, multi-dimensional analysis. Psychooncology 14:771–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Given CW, Given BA (2008) Patient optimism and mastery: do they play a role in cancer patients’ management of pain and fatigue? J Pain Symptom Manag 36:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV (1984) Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 46:489–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weitzner MA, Jacobsen PB, Wagner H, Friedland J, Cox C (1999) The Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 8:55–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pearlin LI, Schooler C (1978) The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 19:2–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lachman ME, Weaver SL (1998) Sociodemographic variations in the sense of control by domain: findings from the MacArthur studies of midlife. Psychol Aging 13:553–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lachman ME, Firth KMP (2004) The adaptive value of feeling in control in midlife. In: Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC (eds) How healthy are we?: a national study of well-being in midlife. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  35. van't Spijker A, Trijsburg RW, Duivenvoorden HJ (1997) Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: a meta-analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom Med 59:280–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stepanikova I, Powroznik K, Cook KS, Tierney DK, Laport GG (2016) Exploring long-term cancer survivors’ experiences in the career and financial domains: interviews with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. J Psychosoc Oncol 34:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the efforts of the study participants, the dedication of Katelyn Ann Tynan and other undergraduate research assistants, and the extensive support and guidance of the late Dr. Karl Blume, who encouraged and inspired this work.

Funding

This research was supported by a Stanford Cancer Center Internal Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena Stepanikova.

Ethics declarations

Ethical background of the study

The study was approved by Stanford University IRB, eProtocol 25865, Title: The Psychosocial Impact of Blood and Marrow Transplantation in Patients with Lymphoma. Currently approved until October 31, 2018. The manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration in the same or substantially similar form in any other peer-reviewed media or outlets. All the authors listed have contributed sufficiently to the project to be included as authors, and all those who are qualified to be authors are listed in the author byline.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stepanikova, I., Powroznik, K., Cook, K. et al. Long-term implications of autologous HCT for caregiver quality of life: how does the survivor’s health matter?. Support Care Cancer 27, 191–198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4311-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4311-1

Keywords

Navigation