Japanese physicians’ attitudes toward end-of-life discussion with pediatric patients with cancer
- 38 Downloads
We explored pediatricians’ practices and attitudes concerning end-of-life discussions (EOLds) with pediatric patients with cancer, and identified the determinants of pediatricians’ positive attitude toward having EOLds with pediatric patients.
A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted with 127 pediatricians specializing in the treatment of pediatric cancer.
Forty-two percent of participants reported that EOLds should be held with the young group of children (6–9 years old), 68% with the middle group (10–15 years old), and 93% with the old group (16–18 years old). Meanwhile, 6, 20, and 35% of participants answered that they “always” or “usually” discussed the incurability of the disease with the young, middle, and old groups, respectively; for the patient’s imminent death, the rates were 2, 11, and 24%. Pediatricians’ attitude that they “should have” EOLds with the young group was predicted by more clinical experience (odds ratio [OR] 1.077; p = 0.007), more confidence in addressing children’s anxiety after EOLd (OR 1.756; p = 0.050), weaker belief in the demand for EOLd (OR 0.456; p = 0.015), weaker belief in the necessity of the EOLd for children to enjoy their time until death (OR, 0.506; p = 0.021), and weaker belief in the importance of maintaining a good relationship with the parents (OR 0.381; p = 0.025).
While pediatricians nearly reached consensus on EOLds for the old group, EOLds with the young group remain a controversial subject. While pediatricians who supported EOLds believed in their effectiveness or necessity, those who were against EOLds tended to consider the benefits of not engaging in them.
KeywordsEnd-of-life discussion Communication Attitude Palliative care
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26780408.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.U.S (2004) Cancer statistics working group. United States Cancer statistics: 2004 incidence and mortality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Statistics and Information Department. Vital Statistics. Tokyo; 2013: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai12/dl/h7.pdf (2013). (In Japanese)
- 6.Parsons SK, Saiki-Craighill S, Mayer DK, Sullivan AM, Jeruss S, Terrin N, Tighiouart H, Nakagawa K, Iwata Y, Hara J, Grier HE, Block S (2007) Telling children and adolescents about their cancer diagnosis: cross-cultural comparisons between pediatric oncologists in the US and Japan. Psychooncology 16:60–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Scott JT, Harmsen M, Prictor MJ, Sowden AJ and Watt I (2003) Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD002969Google Scholar
- 11.British Medical Association. (2001) Consent, rights, and choices in health care for children and young people. London: BMJ BooksGoogle Scholar
- 12.DoH (2002) Core principles for the involvement of children and young people. Listening, Hearing, and Responding. LondonGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mori M, Shimizu C, Ogawa A, Okusaka T, Yoshida S, Morita T (2015) A national survey to systematically identify factors associated with oncologists’ attitudes toward end-of-life discussions: what determines timing of end-of-life discussions? Oncologist 20:1304–1311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar