The codesign of an interdisciplinary team-based intervention regarding initiating palliative care in pediatric oncology
Children with advanced cancer are often not referred to palliative or hospice care before they die or are only referred close to the child’s death. The goals of the current project were to learn about pediatric oncology team members’ perspectives on palliative care, to collaborate with team members to modify and tailor three separate interdisciplinary team-based interventions regarding initiating palliative care, and to assess the feasibility of this collaborative approach.
We used a modified version of experience-based codesign (EBCD) involving members of the pediatric palliative care team and three interdisciplinary pediatric oncology teams (Bone Marrow Transplant, Neuro-Oncology, and Solid Tumor) to review and tailor materials for three team-based interventions. Eleven pediatric oncology team members participated in four codesign sessions to discuss their experiences with initiating palliative care and to review the proposed intervention including patient case studies, techniques for managing uncertainty and negative emotions, role ambiguity, system-level barriers, and team communication and collaboration.
The codesign process showed that the participants were strong supporters of palliative care, members of different teams had preferences for different materials that would be appropriate for their teams, and that while participants reported frustration with timing of palliative care, they had difficulty suggesting how to change current practices.
The current project demonstrated the feasibility of collaborating with pediatric oncology clinicians to develop interventions about introducing palliative care. The procedures and results of this project will be posted online so that other institutions can use them as a model for developing similar interventions appropriate for their needs.
KeywordsPediatric oncology Pediatric palliative care Experience-based codesign Interdisciplinary collaboration Team interventions Uncertainty Role ambiguity Communication
We thank all pediatric oncology team members who participated in this study. We thank Pamela G. Nathanson, MBE and Theodore E. Schall, MBE MSW for their comments on the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Mack JW, Chen LH, Cannavale K, Sattayapiwat O, Cooper RM, Chao CT (2015) End-of-life care intensity among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. JAMA Oncol 1:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1953 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Brown CE, Back AL, Ford DW, Kross EK, Downey L, Shannon SE, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA (2016) Self-assessment scores improve after simulation-based palliative care communication skill workshops. Am J Hosp Palliat Care:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909116681972
- 16.Blackwell RW, Lowton K, Robert G, Grudzen C, Grocott P (2017) Using experience-based co-design with older patients, their families and staff to improve palliative care experiences in the emergency department: a reflective critique on the process and outcomes. Int J Nurs Stud 68:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Tsianakas V, Robert G, Maben J, Richardson A, Dale C, Griffin M, Wiseman T (2012) Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services. Support Care Cancer 20(11):2639–2647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Tsianakas V, Robert G, Richardson A, Verity R, Oakley C, Murrells T, Flynn M, Ream E (2015) Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff. Support Care Cancer 23(10):3069–3080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2677-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Gustavsson S, Gremyr I, Kenne Sarenmalm E (2015) Designing quality of care - contributions from parents: Parents’ experiences of care processes in paediatric care and their contribution to improvements of the care process in collaboration with healthcare professionals. J Clin Nurs 25:742–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Palmer VJ, Chondros P, Piper D, Callander R, Weavell W, Godbee K, Potiriadis M, Richard L, Densely K, Herrman H, Furler J, Pierce D, Schuster T, Iedema R, Gunn J (2015) The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting. BMJ Open 5(3):e006688. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006688 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Knowles MS (1984) Adragogy in action. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 31.Foley KM, Gelband HG (2001) Improving palliative care for cancer. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 33.Altschuler A, Rosenbaum E, Gordon P, Canales S, Avins AL (2012) Audio recordings of mindfulness-based stress reduction training to improve cancer patients’ mood and quality of life—a pilot feasibility study. Support Care Cancer 20(6):1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1216-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Fortney L, Luchterhand C, Zakletskaia L, Zgierska A, Rakel D (2013) Abbreviated mindfulness intervention for job satisfaction, quality of life, and compassion in primary care clinicians: a pilot study. Ann Fam Med 11(5):412–420. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1511 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Glassman LH, Forman EM, Herbert JD, Bradley LE, Foster EE, Izzetoglu M, Ruocco AC (2016) The effects of a brief acceptance-based behavioral treatment versus traditional cognitive-behavioral treatment for public speaking anxiety: an exploratory trial examining differential effects on performance and neurophysiology. Behav Modif 40:748–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516629939 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Anderson W, Donesky D, Joseph D, Sumser B, Reid T (2016) Interprofessional training in palliative care communication handout. University of California Regents, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- 42.Amador S, Goodman C, Mathie E, Nicholson C (2016) Evaluation of an organisational intervention to promote integrated working between health services and care homes in the delivery of end-of-life care for people with dementia: understanding the change process using a social identity approach. Int J Integr Care 16(2):14. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2426 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar