Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the MASCC and CISNE scores for identifying low-risk neutropenic fever patients: analysis of data from three emergency departments of cancer centers in three continents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with febrile neutropenia are a heterogeneous group with a minority developing serious medical complications. Outpatient management of low-risk febrile neutropenia has been shown to be safe and cost-effective. Scoring systems, such as the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE), have been developed and validated to identify low-risk patients. We aimed to compare the performance of these two scores in identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic patients.

Methods

We performed a pooled analysis of patients presenting with febrile neutropenia to three tertiary cancer emergency centers in the USA, UK, and South Korea in 2015. The primary outcome measures were the occurrence of serious complications. Admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and 30-day mortality were secondary outcomes. The predictive performance of each score was analyzed.

Results

Five hundred seventy-one patients presented with febrile neutropenia. With MASCC risk index, 508 (89.1%) were classified as low-risk febrile neutropenia, compared to 60 (10.5%) with CISNE classification. Overall, the MASCC score had a greater discriminatory power in the detection of low-risk patients than the CISNE score (AUC 0.772, 95% CI 0.726–0.819 vs. 0.681, 95% CI 0.626–0.737, p = 0.0024).

Conclusion

Both MASCC and CISNE scores have reasonable discriminatory value in predicting patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. Risk scores should be used in conjunction with clinical judgment for the identification of patients suitable for outpatient management of neutropenic fever. Developing more accurate scores, validated in prospective settings, will be useful in facilitating more patients being managed in an outpatient setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klastersky J, de Naurois J, Rolston K, Rapoport B, Maschmeyer G, Aapro M, Herrstedt J, ESMO Guidelines Committee (2016) Management of febrile neutropaenia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 27(Suppl 5):v111–v118. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Friefeld A, Bow E, Sepkowitz K et al (2011) Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 52(4):e56–e93. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Georgala A, Muanza F, Plehiers B, Dubreucq L, Lalami Y, Aoun M, Barette M (2006) Outpatient oral antibiotics for febrile neutropenic cancer patients using a score predictive for complications. J Clin Oncol 24(25):4129–4134. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Talcott J, Yeap B, Clark J et al (2011) Safety of early discharge for low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 29(30):3977–3988. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Paesmans M, Klastersky J, Maertens J, Georgala A, Muanza F, Aoun M, Ferrant A, Rapoport B, Rolston K, Ameye L (2011) Predicting febrile neutropenic patients at low risk using the MASCC score: does bacteremia matter? Support Care Cancer 19(7):1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0925-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lynn J, Chen K, Weng Y, Chiu T (2013) Risk factors associated with complications in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in emergency department. Hematol Oncol 31(4):189–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carstensen M, Sorensen J (2008) Outpatient management of febrile neutropenia: time to revise present treatment strategy. J Support Oncol 6(5):199–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teuffel O, Ethier M, Alibhal S et al (2011) Outpatient management of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 22(11):2358–2365. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooksley T, Holland M, Klastersky J (2015) Ambulatory outpatient management of patients with low risk febrile neutropaenia. Acute Med 14(4):178–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein E et al (2000) The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Onc 18(16):3038–3051. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.16.3038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Virizuela Echaburu J, Antonio M, Font C, Biosca M, Ramchandani A, Martínez J, Hernando Cubero J, Espinosa J, Martínez de Castro E, Ghanem I, Beato C, Blasco A, Garrido M, Bonilla Y, Mondéjar R, Arcusa Lanza MÁ, Aragón Manrique I, Manzano A, Sevillano E, Castañón E, Cardona M, Gallardo Martín E, Pérez Armillas Q, Sánchez Lasheras F, Ayala de la Peña F (2015) Prediction of serious complications in patients with seemingly stable febrile neutropenia: validation of the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia in a prospective cohort of patients from the FINITE study. J Clin Onc 33(5):465–471. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coyne C, Le V, Brennab J, Castillo E et al (2017) Application of the MASCC and CISNE risk-stratification scores to identify low-risk febrile neutropenic patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 69(6):755–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Virizuela Echaburu J et al (2017) The time has come for new models in febrile neutropenia: a practical demonstration of the inadequacy of the MASCC score. Clin Transl Oncol 19(9):1084–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1644-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Freifeld A, Marchigiani D, Walsh T, Chanock S, Lewis L, Hiemenz J, Hiemenz S, Hicks JE, Gill V, Steinberg SM, Pizzo PA (1999) A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer with chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 341(5):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199907293410501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kern W, Marchetti O, Drgona L et al (2013) Oral antibiotics for fever in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial comparing single daily moxifloxacin with twice daily ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid combination therapy—EORTC Infectious Diseases Group trial XV. J Clin Onc 31:1149–1156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elting L, Lu C, Escalante C et al (2008) Outcomes and cost of outpatient or inpatient management of 712 patients with febrile neutropenia. J Clin Onc 26(4):606–611. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teuffel O, Amir E, Alibhai S, Beyene J, Sung L (2011) Cost-effectiveness of outpatient treatment for febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. B J Cancer 104(9):1377–1383. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Freifeld A, Sepkowitz K (2011) No place like home? Outpatient management of patients with febrile neutropenia and low risk. J Clin Onc 29(30):3952–3954. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.5758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziglam H, Gelly K, Olver W (2007) A survey of the management of neutropenic fever in oncology units in the UK. Int J Antimicrob Agents 29(4):430–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.12.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooksley T, Kitlowski E, Haji-Michael P (2012) Effectiveness of Early Warning Score in predicting outcomes in oncology patients. QJM 105(11):1083–1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcs138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahn S, Lee YS, Lim KS, Lee JL (2013) Adding procalcitonin to the MASCC risk-index score could improve risk stratification of patients with febrile neutropenia. Support Care Cancer 21(8):2303–2308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1787-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooksley T, Rice T (2017) Emergency oncology: development, current position and future direction in the US and UK. Support Care Cancer 25(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3470-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mattison G, Bilney M, Haji-Michael P, Cooksley T (2016) A nurse-led protocol improves the time to first dose intravenous antibiotics in septic patients post chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 24(12):5001–5005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3362-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Cooksley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, S., Rice, T.W., Yeung, Sc.J. et al. Comparison of the MASCC and CISNE scores for identifying low-risk neutropenic fever patients: analysis of data from three emergency departments of cancer centers in three continents. Support Care Cancer 26, 1465–1470 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3985-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3985-0

Keywords

Navigation