Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 3749–3757 | Cite as

Caregiver perspectives on the social competence of pediatric brain tumor survivors

  • Matthew C. Hocking
  • Lauren F. Quast
  • Cole Brodsky
  • Janet A. Deatrick
Original Article

Abstract

Pediatric brain tumor survivors are at risk for significant difficulties related to social competence. Little research has examined factors that contribute to survivor social problems.

Purpose

The current study is grounded in a model of social competence for youth with brain disorder and used qualitative and quantitative methods to obtain caregiver perspectives on survivor social competence and identify pertinent risk and resistance factors.

Methods

The study occurred in two phases, including focus groups with 36 caregivers of 24 survivors and confirmatory interviews with 12 caregivers of 12 survivors.

Results

Qualitative content analyses resulted in three themes that were illustrative of the model of social competence. Themes included (1) the impact of survivor sequelae on social function; (2) the role of family in evaluating and promoting survivor social development; and (3) the match between the survivor’s social context and developmental needs. Quantitative data supported the associations between survivor social skills, survivor executive function, and family functioning.

Conclusions

Overall, findings underscore the influence of risk and resistance factors across different systems on survivor social competence and suggest directions for future research and intervention efforts.

Keywords

Pediatric brain tumor Qualitative Social competence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The National Cancer Institute funded this research (1K07CA178100). The authors thank all study participants and Julie Baran, Lauren Lipshutz, Linda Maldonado, Kelly Mannion, Mark McCurdy, and Elise Turner for their roles in data analyses.

Compliance with ethical standards

An institutional review board approved all study procedures and all study procedures occurred in compliance with ethical standards for human participants research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

520_2017_3805_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Zeltzer L, Recklitis CJ, Buchbinder D, Zebrack B, Casillas JN, Tsao JCI, Lu Q, Krull K (2009) Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 27:2396–2404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schulte F, Barrera M (2010) Social competence in childhood brain tumor survivors: a comprehensive review. Support Care Cancer 18:1499–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ness KK, Morris EB, Nolan VG, Howell CR, Gilchrist LS, Stovall M, Cox CL, Klosky JL, Gajjar A, Neglia JP (2010) Physical performance limitations among adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. Cancer 116:3034–3044CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zebrack B, Gurney JG, Oeffinger KC, Whitton JA, Packer RJ, Mertens A, Turk N, Castleberry R, Dreyer Z, Robison LL, Zeltzer LK (2004) Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood brain cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 22:999–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robinson KE, Kuttesch JF, Champion JE, Andreotti CF, Hipp DW, Bettis A, Barnwell A, Compas BE (2010) A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of pediatric brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55:525.531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker JG, Asher SR (1987) Peer relations and later personal adjustment: are low-accepted children at risk? Psychol Bull 102:357–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parker JG, Rubin KH, Erath SA, Wojslawowicz JC, Buskirk AA (2006) Peer relationships and developmental psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen D (eds) Developmental psychopathology: risk, disorder, and adaptation. Wiley, New York, pp 419–493Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yeates KO, Bigler ED, Dennis M, Gerhardt CA, Rubin KH, Stancin T, Taylor HG, Vannatta K (2007) Social outcomes in childhood brain disorder: a heuristic integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Psychol Bull 133:535–556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rubin KH, Rose-Krasnor L (1992) Interpersonal problem-solving and social competence in children. In: Van Hassett VB, Hersen M (eds) Handbook of social development. Plenum, New York, pp 283–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moyer KH, Willard VW, Gross AM, Netson KL, Ashford JM, Kahalley LS, Wu S, Xiong X, Conklin HM (2012) The impact of attention on social functioning in survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:1290–1295CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolfe KR, Walsh KS, Reynolds NC, Mitchell F, Reddy AT, Paltin I, Madan-Swain A (2012) Executive functions and social skills in survivors of pediatric brain tumor. Child Neuropsychol 19:370–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonner MJ, Hardy KK, Willard VW, Anthony KK, Hood M, Gururangan S (2008) Social functioning and facial expression recognition in survivors of pediatric brain tumors. J Pediatr Psychol 33:1142–1152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlson-Green B, Morris RD, Krawiecki NS (1995) Family and illness predictors of outcome in pediatric brain tumors. J Pediatr Psychol 20:769–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu YP, Thompson D, Aroian KJ, McQuaid EL, Deatrick JA (2016) Commentary: writing and evaluating qualitative research reports. J Pediatr Psychol 41(5):493–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hocking MC, McCurdy M, Turner E, Kazak AE, Noll RB, Phillips P, Barakat LP (2015) Social competence in pediatric brain tumor survivors: application of a model from social neuroscience and developmental psychology. J Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yeates KO, Swift E, Taylor HG, Wade SL, Drotar D, Stancin T, Minich N (2004) Short- and long-term social outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 10:412–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ganesalingam K, Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Walz NC, Stancin T, Wade SL (2011) Executive functions and social competence in young children 6 months following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 25:466–476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bronfrenbrenner U (1979) The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crick NR, Dodge KA (1994) A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychol Bull 115:74–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guba EG (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Commun Technol 29:75–91Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS (1983) The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther 9:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS (2001) The PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 version. Med Care 39:800–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L (2000) Behavior rating inventory of executive function: BRIEF. Psychological Assessment Resources, OdessaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gresham FM, Elliott SN (2008) Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales manual. NCS Pearson, PattonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sandelowski M (1986) The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Adv Nurs Sci 8:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic data analysis. Cambridge Univeristy Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Varni JW, Limbers C, Burwinkle TS (2007) Literature reviews: health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: hearing the voices of the children. J Pediatr Pscyhol 32:1151–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dennis M, Barnes MA, Wilkinson M, Humphreys RP (1998) How children with head injury represent real and deceptive emotion in short narratives. Brain Lang 61:450–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Janusz JA, Kirkwood MW, Yeates KO, Taylor HG (2002) Social problem-solving skills in children with traumatic brain injury: long-term outcomes and prediction of social competence. Child Neuropsychol 8:179–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dennis M, Simic N, Agostino A, Taylor HG, Bigler ED, Rubin K, Vannatta K, Gerhardt CA, Stancin T, Yeates KO (2013) Irony and empathy in children with traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 19:338–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Oncology, The Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.School of NursingUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations