Caregiver perspectives on the social competence of pediatric brain tumor survivors
Pediatric brain tumor survivors are at risk for significant difficulties related to social competence. Little research has examined factors that contribute to survivor social problems.
The current study is grounded in a model of social competence for youth with brain disorder and used qualitative and quantitative methods to obtain caregiver perspectives on survivor social competence and identify pertinent risk and resistance factors.
The study occurred in two phases, including focus groups with 36 caregivers of 24 survivors and confirmatory interviews with 12 caregivers of 12 survivors.
Qualitative content analyses resulted in three themes that were illustrative of the model of social competence. Themes included (1) the impact of survivor sequelae on social function; (2) the role of family in evaluating and promoting survivor social development; and (3) the match between the survivor’s social context and developmental needs. Quantitative data supported the associations between survivor social skills, survivor executive function, and family functioning.
Overall, findings underscore the influence of risk and resistance factors across different systems on survivor social competence and suggest directions for future research and intervention efforts.
KeywordsPediatric brain tumor Qualitative Social competence
The National Cancer Institute funded this research (1K07CA178100). The authors thank all study participants and Julie Baran, Lauren Lipshutz, Linda Maldonado, Kelly Mannion, Mark McCurdy, and Elise Turner for their roles in data analyses.
Compliance with ethical standards
An institutional review board approved all study procedures and all study procedures occurred in compliance with ethical standards for human participants research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 4.Zebrack B, Gurney JG, Oeffinger KC, Whitton JA, Packer RJ, Mertens A, Turk N, Castleberry R, Dreyer Z, Robison LL, Zeltzer LK (2004) Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood brain cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 22:999–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Parker JG, Rubin KH, Erath SA, Wojslawowicz JC, Buskirk AA (2006) Peer relationships and developmental psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen D (eds) Developmental psychopathology: risk, disorder, and adaptation. Wiley, New York, pp 419–493Google Scholar
- 18.Bronfrenbrenner U (1979) The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 20.Guba EG (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ Commun Technol 29:75–91Google Scholar
- 21.Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L (2000) Behavior rating inventory of executive function: BRIEF. Psychological Assessment Resources, OdessaGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gresham FM, Elliott SN (2008) Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales manual. NCS Pearson, PattonGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic data analysis. Cambridge Univeristy Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar