The existing crisp and fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods exhibit consistency, complexity, and reliability issues. To address these challenges, we propose a new MCDM method called fuzzy technique for best–worst analysis (FTBWA). In FTBWA, a decision-maker (DM) first identifies a set of criteria and then determines the best–worst criteria. Next, the DM performs the fuzzy reference comparisons between the best-to-other (BtO) and the others-to-worst (OtW) criteria using the linguistic expressions. The process results in fuzzy BtO and fuzzy OtW vectors, which are then defuzzified to obtain quantifiable values. Afterward, a maximin problem is built and solved to obtain the weights of criteria and alternatives. The best alternative can be selected based on the final score obtained by aggregating the weights of different sets of criteria and alternatives. Further, we propose a consistency ratio to check the reliability of the results of FTBWA. To verify the practicality and consistency of FTBWA, we perform two illustrative case studies. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis considering a comparative analysis, rank reversal analysis, and support for group decision making. From the results, we observe that FTBWA outperforms existing fuzzy/crisp MCDM methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aboutorab H, Saberi M, Asadabadi MR, Hussain O, Chang E, Rajabi M, Chang E (2018) ZBWM: the Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development. Expert Syst Appl 107:115–125
Belton V, Gear T (1983) On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11(3):228–230
Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) Note—a preference ranking organisation Method. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238
Chang C-L (2010) A modified VIKOR method for multiple criteria analysis. Environ Monit Assess 168(1–4):339–344
Chen T-Y, Tsao C-Y (2008) The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(11):1410–1428
Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2015) The ELECTRE I multi-criteria decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 14(03):621–657
Figueira JR, Greco S, Roy B, Słowiński R (2013) An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 20(1–2):61–85
George JK, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. US Ed edition (11 May 1995)
Govindan K, Jepsen MB (2016) ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 250:1–29
Guillaume S, Charnomordic B (2004) Fuzzy inference systems to model sensory evaluation. In: Intelligent sensory evaluation, pp 197–216
Guo S, Zhao H (2017) Fuzzy best–worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl Based Syst 121:23–31
Gupta H, Barua MK (2017) Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Clean Prod 152:242–258
Hafezalkotob A, Hafezalkotob A (2017) A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best–worst method. Appl Soft Comput 59:316–325
Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M (2011) An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39(4):373–386
Hendriks MMWB, de Boer JH, Smilde AK, Doornbos DA (1992) Multicriteria decision making. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 16(3):175–191
Hussain A, Chun J, Khan M (2020) A novel customer-centric Methodology for Optimal Service Selection (MOSS) in a cloud environment. Future Gen Comput Syst 105:562–580
Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, a state of the art survey, vol 1. Springer, Berlin
Jingzhu W, Xiangyi L (2008) The multiple attribute decision-making VIKOR method and its application. In: 2008 4th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, pp 1–4
Kahraman C (2008) Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: theory and applications with recent developments, vol 16. Springer Science & Business Media, Cham
Kauffman A, Gupta MM (1985). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic, theory and application. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York
Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1991) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic, theory and applications. VanNostrand Reinhold, New York
Kheybari S, Kazemi M, Rezaei J (2019) Bioethanol facility location selection using best–worst method. Appl Energy 242:612–623
Kumar A, Kaur J, Singh P (2011) A new method for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problems. Appl Math Model 35(2):817–823
Liao H, Mi X, Yu Q, Luo L (2019) Hospital performance evaluation by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic best worst method with inconsistency repairing. J Clean Prod 232:657–671
Mardani A, Jusoh A, Nor KMD, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015) Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ Res 28(1):516–571
Mi X, Tang M, Liao H, Shen W, Lev B (2019) The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: why, what, what for and what’s next? Omega 87:205–225
Mou Q, Xu Z, Liao H (2016) An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best–worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Inf Sci 374:224–239
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455
Ouma YO, Opudo J, Nyambenya S (2015) Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for road pavement maintenance prioritization: methodological exposition and case study. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/140189
Rezaei J (2015) Best–worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53(Dm):49–57
Rezaei J (2016) Best–worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:126–130
Rezaei J, Wang J, Tavasszy L (2015) Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Syst Appl 42(23):9152–9164
Rezaei J, Nispeling T, Sarkis J, Tavasszy L (2016) A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J Clean Prod 135:577–588
Roy B (1978) ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers Du CERO 20(1):3–24
Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theor Decis 31(1):49–73
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281
Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43
Saaty TL (2004) Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(1):1–35
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1984) The legitimacy of rank reversal. Omega 12(5):513–516
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2013) The analytic network process. Decis Mak Anal Netw Process 195:1–40
Salimi N, Rezaei J (2016) Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using the best–worst method. Scientometrics 109(3):1911–1938
Salimi N, Rezaei J (2018) Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Eval Program Plan 66(October 2017):147–155
Serrai W, Abdelli A, Mokdad L, Hammal Y (2017) Towards an efficient and a more accurate web service selection using MCDM methods. J Comput Sci 22:253–267
Shyamal AK, Pal M (2007) Triangular fuzzy matrices. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 4(1):75–87
Torfi F, Farahani RZ, Rezapour S (2010) Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Appl Soft Comput J 10(2):520–528
Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study, vol 44. Springer US, Boston
Tzeng G-H, Huang J-J (2011) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Chapman and Hall, London
Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua Z (2008) On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 186(2):735–747
Whaiduzzaman M, Gani A, Anuar NB, Shiraz M, Haque MN, Haque IT (2014) Cloud service selection using multicriteria decision analysis. Sci World J 2014(9):459375
Yong LYL (2009) A novel method for decision making based on triangular fuzzy number. Chin Control Decis Conf 2009:4276–4279
You X, Chen T, Yang Q (2016) Approach to multi-criteria group decision-making problems based on the best–worst-method and electre method. Symmetry 8(9):95
Zadeh LA (1984) Making computers think like people. IEEE Spectr 21(8):26–32
Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems. Arch Math Logic 32(32):1–32
We would gratefully acknowledge the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) as the research program under [Grant Number 71671025, 71421001].
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in this study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Hussain, A., Chun, J. & Khan, M. A novel multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach for precise decision making under a fuzzy environment. Soft Comput (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05561-9
- Fuzzy best–worst method
- Fuzzy multicriteria decision making
- Fuzzy reference comparisons
- Decision-making methods
- Soft computing
- Consistency ratio