Advertisement

The characterizations of upper approximation operators based on coverings

  • Pei Wang
  • Qingguo Li
Foundations
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, We propose a condition of symmetry for the covering \(\mathscr {C}\) in a covering-based approximation space \((U,\mathscr {C})\). By using this condition, we obtain general, topological and intuitive characterizations of the covering \({\mathscr {C}}\) for two types of covering-based upper approximation operators being closure operators. We investigate axiomatic systems for \(\overline{apr}_{S}\) and discuss the relationships among upper approximation operators. We also give a description of \((U,{\mathscr {C}})\) in terms of information exchange systems when these operators are closure ones. We also solve an open problem raised by Ge et al.

Keywords

Closure operator Covering-based upper approximation operator Partition Third condition of symmetry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11371130) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (Nos. 2014GXNSFBA118015, 2016CSOBDP0004, 2016JC2014 and KY2015YB244).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Bian X, Wang P, Yu Z, Bai X, Chen B (2015) Characterizations of coverings for upper approximation operators being closure operators. Inf Sci 314:41–54MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonikowski Z, Bryniarski E, Skardowska UW (1998) Extensions and intentions in the rough set theory. Inf Sci 107:149–167MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryniarski E (1989) A calculus of rough sets of the first order. Bull Pol Acad Sci Math 16:71–78MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Cattaneo G (1998) Abstract approximation spaces for rough theory. In: Rough sets in knowledge discovery 1: methodology and applications, pp 59–98Google Scholar
  5. Cattaneo G, Ciucci D (2004) Algebraic structures for rough sets. In: LNCS, vol 3135, pp 208–252Google Scholar
  6. Chen D, Wang C (2007) A new aooproach to arrtibute reduction of consistent and inconsistent covering decision systems with covering rough sets. Inf Sci 176:3500–3518zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, Li J, Lin Y, Lin G, Ma Z (2015) Relations of reduction between covering generalized rough sets and concept lattices. Inf Sci 304:16–27MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Deer L, Restrepo M, Cornelis C, Gmez J (2016) Neighborhood operators for covering-based rough sets. Inf Sci 336:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engelking R (1989) General topology. Heldermann Verlag, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan N, Hu G, Liu H (2011) Study of definable subsets in covering approximation space of rough sets. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on information reuse and integration, vol 1, pp 21–24Google Scholar
  11. Fan N, Hu G, Zhang W (2012) Study on conditions of neighborhoods forming a partition. In: Fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD), pp 256–259Google Scholar
  12. Gao JS et al (2008) A new conflict analysis model based on rough set theory. Chin J Manag 5:813–818 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Ge X (2010) An application of covering approximation spaces on network security. Comput Math Appl 60:1191–1199MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Ge X (2014) Connectivity of covering approximation spaces and its applications onepidemiological issue. Appl Soft Comput 25:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ge X, Li Z (2011) Definable subset in covering approximation spaces. Int J Comput Math Sci 5:31–34MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Ge X, Bai X, Yun Z (2012) Topological characterizations of covering for special covering-based upper approximation operators. Inf Sci 204:70–81MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Ge X, Bai X, Yun Z (2012) Topological characterizations of covering for special covering-based upper approximation operators. Inf Sci 204:70–81MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Kondo M (2005) On the structure of generalized rough sets. Inf Sci 176:589–600MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin TY (1997) Neighborhood systems C application to qualitative fuzzy and rough sets. In: Wang PP (ed) Advances in machine intelligence and soft computing IV. Department of Electrical Engineering, Durham, pp 132–155Google Scholar
  20. Liu J et al (2003) Application study of rough comprehensive evaluation method in green manufacturing evaluation. Chongqing Environ Sci 12:65–67 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Liu G (2006) The axiomatization of the rough set upper approximation operations. Fundam Inf 69:331–342MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu G (2008) Axiomatic systems for rough sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 48:857–867MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu G (2013) Using one axiom to characterize rough set and fuzzy rough set approximations. Inf Sci 223:285–296MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu G, Sai Y (2009) A comparison of two types of rough sets induced by coverings. Int J Approx Reason 50:521–528MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu G, Zhu W (2008) The algebraic structures of generalized rough set theory. Inf Sci 178:4105–4113MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Mrozek A (1996) Methodology of rough controller synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1135–1139Google Scholar
  27. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rudiments of rough sets. Inf Sci 177:3–27MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rough sets: some extensions. Inf Sci 177:28–40MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rough sets and boolean reasoning. Inf Sci 177:41–73MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Pomykala JA (1987) Approximation operations in approximation space. Bull Pol Acad Sci Math 35:653–662MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Qin K, Pei Z (2005) On the topological properties of fuzzy rough sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 151:601–613MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Qin K, Gao Y, Pei Z (2007) On covering rough sets. In: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 4481, pp 34–41Google Scholar
  35. Samanta P, Chakraborty MK (2009) Covering based approaches to rough sets and implication lattices. In: RSFDGRC 2009 LANI 5908, pp 127–134Google Scholar
  36. Skowron A (1989) The relationship between the rough sets and evidence theory. Bull Pol Acad Sci Math 37:160–173Google Scholar
  37. Skowron A, Stepaniuk J (1996) Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundam Inf 272:45–253MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Slowinski R, Vanderpooten D (2000) A generalized definition of rough approximations based on similarity. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tang XJ et al (2015) Application of rough set theory in item cognitive attribute identification. Acta Psychol Sin 47:950–957 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Thomas GB (2003) Thomas calculus, 10th edn. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsumoto S (1996) Automated discovery of medical expert system rules from clinical database on rough set. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, vol 32, pp 63–72Google Scholar
  42. Wang JC et al (2004) Study on the application of rough set theory in substrate feeding control and fault diagnosis in fermentation process. Comput Eng Appl 16:203–205 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Yang B, Hu B (2016) A fuzzy covering-based rough set model and its generalization over fuzzy lattice. Inf Sci 367–368:463–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang T, Li Q, Zhou B (2010) Reduction about approximation spaces of covering generalized rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 51:335–345MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Yao Y (1998) Relational interpretations of neighborhood operators and rough set approximation operators. Inf Sci 111:239–259MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Yao Y (1998) A comparative study of fuzzy sets and rough sets. Inf Sci 109:227–242MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Yao Y (1998) Constructive and algebraic methods of theory of rough sets. Inf Sci 109:21–47MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Yao Y, Yao B (2012) Covering based rough set approximation. Inf Sci 200:91–107MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Yu Z, Bai X, Qiu Z (2013) A study of rough sets based on 1-neighborhood systems. Inf Sci 248:103–113MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Zadeh L (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zakowski W (1983) Approximations in the space\( (U,\Pi ) \). Demonstr Math 16:761–769zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang GH et al (2017) Sensory quality prediction of tobacco based on rough sets and gray system. Comput Appl Chem 34:163–166 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang DZH et al (2017) Research on the model of audit opinion prediction based on integration of neighborhood rough sets and neural network. J Chongqing Univ Technol 31:96–99 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Zhang YL, Luo MK (2013) Relationships beween covering-based rough sets and relation-based rough sets. Inf Sci 225:55–71CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Y, Li C, Lin M, Lin Y (2015) Relationships between generalized rough sets based on covering and reflexive neighborhood system. Inf Sci 319:56–67MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao D et al (2010) Classification of biological data based on rough sets. Comput Mod 7:96–99 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  58. Zhu W (2007) Topological approaches to covering rough sets. Inf Sci 177:1499–1508MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu W (2007) Generalized rough sets based on relations. Inf Sci 177:4997–5011MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhu W (2009) Relationship between generalized rough sets based on binary relation and covering. Inf Sci 179:210–225MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhu W (2009) Relationship among basic concepts in covering-based rough sets. Inf Sci 179:2478–2486MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhu W, Wang FY (2007) On three types of covering rough sets. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19:1131–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhu W, Wang FY (2012) The fourth type of covering-based rough sets. Inf Sci 1016:1–13MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhu W, Zhang WX (2002) Neighborhood operators systems and approximations. Inf Sci 144:201–217MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhu W, Wang F (2007) Properties of the third type of covering-based rough sets. In: ICMLC07, pp 3746–3751Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mathematics and EconometricsHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Guangxi Universities Key Lab of Complex System Optimization and Big Data ProcessingYulin Normal UniversityYulinChina

Personalised recommendations