Skip to main content
Log in

Boundary controllability of structural acoustic systems with variable coefficients and curved walls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies a structural acoustic model consisting of an interior acoustic wave equation with variable coefficients and a coupled Kirchhoff plate equation with a curved middle surface. By the Riemannian geometry approach and the multiplier technique, we establish exact controllability of the hybrid system under verifiable assumptions on the geometry of the interior domain and the interface boundary with two controls: One is a Neumann boundary control exerted on the wave equation, and the other acts on the interior of the plate equation. Furthermore, if the control for the plate equation is active alone, we prove that the hybrid system with partial Robin boundary condition of the wave equation is exactly controllable with the plate component and approximately controllable with the wave component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allibert B, Micu S (1999) Controllability of analytic functions for a wave equation coupled with a beam. Rev Mat Iberoam 15:547–592

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin JP (1963) Un theoreme de compacite. C R Acad Sci Paris 256:5042–5044

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Avalos G (1996) The exponential stability of a coupled hyerbolic/parabolic system arising in structural acoustics. Appl Abstr Anal 1:203–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Avalos G, Lasiecka I (1996) Differential Riccati equation for the active control of a problem in structural acoustics. J Optim Theory Appl 91:695–728

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Avalos G, Lasiecka I (2003) Exact controllability of structural acoustic interactions. J Math Pures Appl 82:1047–1073

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Avalos G, Lasiecka I (2005) Exact controllability of finite energy states for an acoustic wave/plate interaction under the influence of boundary and localized controls. Adv Differ Equ 10:901–930

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Avalos G, Lasiecka I, Rebarber R (2001) Well-posedness of a structural acoustics control model with point observation of the pressure. J Differ Equ 173:40–78

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Avalos G, Lasiecka I, Rebarber R (2003) Boundary controllability of a coupled wave/Kirchhoff system. Syst Control Lett 50:331–341

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Banks HT, Fang W, Silcox RJ, Smith RC (1991) Approximation methods for control of acoustic/structure models with piezoceramic actuators. NASA, Contract Report

  10. Banks HT, Smith RC (1995) Feedback control of noise in a 2D nonlinear structural acoustics model. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst 1:119–149

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Beale JT, Rosencrans SI (1974) Acoustic boundary conditions. Bull Am Math Soc 80:1276–1278

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Beale JT (1976) Spectral properties of an acoustic boundary condition. Indiana Univ Math J 25:895–917

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Beale JT (1977) Acoustic scattering from locally reacting surfaces. Indiana Univ Math J 26:199–222

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cagnol J, Lebiedzik C (1995) Optimal control of a structural acoustic model with flexible curved walls, control and boundary analysis. In: Cagnol J, Zolesio JP (eds) Control and boundary analysis. Lecture notes in pure and applied mathematics, vol 240. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 37–52

    Google Scholar 

  15. Camurdan M (1998) Uniform stabilization of a coupled structural acoustic system by boundary dissipation. Abstr Appl Anal 3:377–400

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Camurdan M, Triggiani R (1999) Sharp regularity of a coupled system of a wave and Kirchhoff equation with point control arising in noise reduction. Differ Integral Equ 12:101–118

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cavalcanti MM, Lasiecka I, Toundykov D (2012) Wave equation with damping affecting only a subset of static Wentzell boundary is uniformly stable. Trans Am Math Soc 364:5693–5713

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavalcanti MM, Lasiecka I, Toundykov D (2012) Geometrically constrained stabilization of wave equations with Wentzell boundary conditions. Appl Anal 91:1427–1452

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dolecki S, Russell DL (1977) A general theory of observation and control. SIAM J Control Optim 15:185–220

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fattorini HO (1985) Second order linear differential equations in Banach spaces, vol 108. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Grobbelaar-Van Dalsen M (2006) On a structural acoustic model with interface a Reissner–Mindlin plate or a Timoshenko beam. J Math Anal Appl 320:121–144

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo YX, Yao PF (2006) Stabilization of Euler-Bernoulli plate equation with variable coefficients by nonlinear boundary feedback. J Math Anal Appl 317:50–70

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lagnese JE, Lions JL (1988) Modeling, analysis and control of thin plates. Masson, Paris

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Lasiecka I, Triggiani R (1989) Exact controllability of the wave equation with Neumann boundary control. Appl Math Optim 19:243–290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Lasiecka I, Triggiani R (1992) Uniform stabilization of the wave equation with Dirichlet or Neumann feedback control with no geometrical conditions. Appl Math Optim 25:189–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Lasiecka I, Triggiani R (1994) Recent advances in regularity of second-order hyperbolic mixed problems, and applications. In: Jones CKRT, Kirchgraber U, Walther HO (eds) Dynamics reported: expositions in dynamical systems, vol 3. Springer, New York, pp 104–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Lasiecka I, Triggiani R, Zhang X (2000) Nonconservative wave equations with unobserved Neumann B.C.: Global uniqueness and observability on one shot. In: Gulliver R, Littman W, Triggiani R (eds) Differential geometric methods in the control of partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 227–325

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Lebiedzik C (2000) Uniform stability of a coupled structural acoustic system with thermoelastic effects. Dyn Contin Discrete Impuls Syst 7:369–383

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lions JL, Magenes E (1972) Non-homogeneous boundary value problems and applications, vol 1. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu B, Littman W (1998) On the spectral properties and stabilization of acoustic flow. SIAM J Appl Math 59:7–34

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu YX, Bin-Mohsin B, Hajaiej H, Yao PF, Chen G (2016) Exact controllability of structural acoustic interactions with variable coefficients. SIAM J Control Optim 54:2132–2153

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu LQ, Li SJ, Chen G, Yao PF (2015) Control and stabilization for the wave equation with variable coefficients in domains with moving boundary. Syst Control Lett 80:30–41

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Micu S, Zuazua E (1997) Boundary controllability of a linear hybrid system arising in the control of noise. SIAM J Control Optim 35:1614–1637

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Miyatake S (1973) Mixed problem for hyperbolic equation of second order. J Math Kyoto Univ 13:435–487

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Morse PM, Ingard KU (1968) Theoretical acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ning ZH, Yan QX (2010) Stabilization of the wave equation with variable coefficients and a delay in dissipative boundary feedback. J Math Anal Appl 367:167–173

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Seto K, Ren MZ, Doi F (2001) Modeling and feedback structural acoustics control of a flexible plate. J Vib Acoust 123:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sprofera JD, Cabell RH, Gibbs GP, Clark RL (2007) Structural acoustic control of plates with variable boundary conditions: design methodology. J Acoust Soc Am 122:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu JQ, Feng F, Chai SG (2015) Energy decay of a variable-coefficient wave equation with nonlinear time-dependent localized damping. Electron J Differ Equ 226:1–11

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang FY (2016) Exact controllability of the Euler–Bernoulli plate with variable coefficients and simply supported boundary condition. Electron J Differ Equ 257:1–19

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang FY, Bin-Mohsin B, Chen G, Yao PF (2010) Exact–approximate boundary controllability of the thermoelastic plate with a curved middle surface. J Math Anal Appl 451:405–433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Yao PF (1999) On the observability inequalities for exact controllability of wave equations with variable coefficients. SIAM J Control Optim 37:1568–1599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao PF (2000) Observability inequalities for the Euler–Bernoulli plate with variable coefficients. In: Gulliver R, Littman W, Triggiani R (eds) Differential geometric methods in the control of partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 383–406

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Yao PF (2010) Boundary controllability for the quasilinear wave equation. Appl Math Optim 61:191–233

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Yao PF (2011) Modeling and control in vibrational and structural dynamics: a differential geometric approach. Chapman and Hall/CRC Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science Series. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang ZF, Yao PF (2008) Global smooth solutions of the quasi-linear wave equation with internal velocity feedback. SIAM J Control Optim 47:2044–2077

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the editors and reviewers for their valuable comments and helpful suggestions. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) of China under Grant Nos/ 61473126 and 61573342, and Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS, No. QYZDJ-SSW-SYS011, and Qatar National Research Funds Grant NPRP 9-166-1-031.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pengfei Yao.

Appendix: Derivation of the curved plate model in system (1.1)

Appendix: Derivation of the curved plate model in system (1.1)

In this appendix, we show how to use the Principle of Virtual Work to derive the (uncoupled) equations of motion for the vertical displacement w of the specific plate model under study in this paper. Let a plate have a curved middle surface \(\varGamma _0,\) which is a part of a surface M in \({\mathbb {R}}^3\) with the induced metric \(\tilde{g}\) from the Euclidean metric of \({\mathbb {R}}^3\). Then, the curved plate is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \{\,x+t\,\vec {n}\,|\,x\in \varGamma _0,\,\,t\in (-h/2,h/2)\,\}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\vec {n}\) is the unit normal on \(\varGamma _0\) and \(h>0\) is the thickness of the plate along its normal. We assume that the external deformation along the normal of the middle surface is small, i.e., the strain tensor of the middle surface is zero. Then, the strain energy of the bending of the plate is [23]

$$\begin{aligned} V=\frac{\textsf {D}}{2}\int _{\varGamma _0} a(w,w)\mathrm{d}\varGamma _0, \end{aligned}$$

where \(a(w,w)=(1-\mu )\langle D^2_{\tilde{g}}w,D^2_{\tilde{g}}w\rangle _{T^2_x}+\mu (\Delta _{\tilde{g}} w)^2\), \(\gamma =\frac{h^2}{12}\), \(\textsf {D}=\frac{Eh\gamma }{1-\mu ^2}\) is called the modulus of flexural rigidity, \(E,\mu \) and \(\rho \) denote Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and mass density, respectively. The kinetic energy of the plate is assumed to be

$$\begin{aligned} K=\frac{\rho h}{2}\int _{\varGamma _0}\left( w^2_t+\gamma |\nabla _{\tilde{g}}w_t|_{\tilde{g}}^2\right) \mathrm{d}\varGamma _0. \end{aligned}$$

Besides, we assume that there is no external loading on the plate. Accordingly, the corresponding Lagrangian for the plate is

$$\begin{aligned} L=\int ^T_0(K-V)\mathrm{d}t. \end{aligned}$$

Consider a plate which is clamped along the edge \( \partial \varGamma _0\times (-h/2,h/2)\), that is \(w=\frac{\partial w}{\partial \nu _{\tilde{g}}}=0~\text{ on }~~\partial \varGamma _0\times (0,T).\) The usual calculus of variations (Principle of Virtual Work) for a stationary point of L yields

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \rho hw_{tt}-\rho h\gamma \Delta _{\tilde{g}} w_{tt}+\textsf {D}\left[ \Delta ^2_{\tilde{g}}w-(1-\mu )\delta (k\hbox {d}w)\right] = 0&{}\quad \hbox {on}~(0,T)\times \varGamma _0,\\ w=\frac{\partial w}{\partial \nu _{\tilde{g}}}=0&{}\quad \hbox {on}~(0,T)\times \partial \varGamma _0,\\ w(0)=w_0,w_t(0)=w_1. \\ \end{array} \right. \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(5.1)

Making the change \(t\rightarrow t\sqrt{\frac{\textsf {D}}{\rho h}}\) in the time scale, we can derive the (uncoupled version of the) bending plate model in system (1.1).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, F., Yao, P. & Chen, G. Boundary controllability of structural acoustic systems with variable coefficients and curved walls. Math. Control Signals Syst. 30, 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-018-0211-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-018-0211-7

Keywords

Navigation