Our paper explores the societal challenges linked to increased air conditioning use and the problems associated with relying on one technology for cooling and discusses more sustainable alternatives and the societal responsibilities for implementing these. The supplementary opinion provided by Dr. Bin Yang, Dr. Stefano Schiavon and Dr. Faming Wang is a great technical complement to our paper by adding more energy-efficient solutions to our analysis of alternatives to air conditioning for cooling. The opinion gives more technical details and insights into how individuals can achieve thermal comfort in an energy efficient way. However, the aim of our paper was not to conduct a comprehensive assessment of cooling technologies, which we also state in the paper. The aim was to discuss challenges and potential alternatives using a transdisciplinary approach. Moreover, the analytical framework developed discusses alternative solutions and responsibilities at four societal levels—the individual, community, city, and national level. We argue that it is problematic to leave the responsibility to come up with cooling solutions entirely to the individual. We need a combination of solutions that are holistic and involve various levels in society.