Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in relative fit of human heat stress indices to cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal hospitalizations across five Australian urban populations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 01 March 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Various human heat stress indices have been developed to relate atmospheric measures of extreme heat to human health impacts, but the usefulness of different indices across various health impacts and in different populations is poorly understood. This paper determines which heat stress indices best fit hospital admissions for sets of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal diseases across five Australian cities. We hypothesized that the best indices would be largely dependent on location. We fit parent models to these counts in the summers (November–March) between 2001 and 2013 using negative binomial regression. We then added 15 heat stress indices to these models, ranking their goodness of fit using the Akaike information criterion. Admissions for each health outcome were nearly always higher in hot or humid conditions. Contrary to our hypothesis that location would determine the best-fitting heat stress index, we found that the best indices were related largely by health outcome of interest, rather than location as hypothesized. In particular, heatwave and temperature indices had the best fit to cardiovascular admissions, humidity indices had the best fit to respiratory admissions, and combined heat-humidity indices had the best fit to renal admissions. With a few exceptions, the results were similar across all five cities. The best-fitting heat stress indices appear to be useful across several Australian cities with differing climates, but they may have varying usefulness depending on the outcome of interest. These findings suggest that future research on heat and health impacts, and in particular hospital demand modeling, could better reflect reality if it avoided “all-cause” health outcomes and used heat stress indices appropriate to specific diseases and disease groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 01 March 2019

    The authors of the article would like to bring the following correction/corrigendum to attention: When recently investigating future changes in heat stress indices, we discovered an error in the use of the heatwave indices we compared in Goldie et al. (2017).

  • 01 March 2019

    The authors of the article would like to bring the following correction/corrigendum to attention: When recently investigating future changes in heat stress indices, we discovered an error in the use of the heatwave indices we compared in Goldie et al. (2017).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Marissa Parry of the Climate Change Research Centre for her assistance defining public holidays across Australia, Peter Tait of the Australian National University Medical School for his assistance identifying relevant diseases, and Donna Mary Salopek of the UNSW Statistical Consulting service for her guidance in optimizing the fit of the regression models.

Funding information

S.C.L. is funded through the Australian Research Council (DE160100092). J.G., L.A., S.C.L., and S.C.S. are funded by an Australian Research Council grant (CE110001028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Goldie.

Ethics declarations

This research was approved by the UNSW Human Research Ethics Advisory (HREA) (HC15125), the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (2015/239), the Royal Brisbane & Women’s HREC (HREC/15/QRBW/202), the SA Health HREC (HREC/15/SAH/41), and the Department of Health WA HREC (2015/27).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 143 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldie, J., Alexander, L., Lewis, S.C. et al. Changes in relative fit of human heat stress indices to cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal hospitalizations across five Australian urban populations. Int J Biometeorol 62, 423–432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1451-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1451-9

Keywords

Navigation