International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 59, Issue 12, pp 1825–1837 | Cite as

Customized rating assessment of climate suitability (CRACS): climate satisfaction evaluation based on subjective perception

Original Paper

Abstract

Climate not only influences the behavior of people in urban environments but also affects people’s schedules and travel plans. Therefore, providing people with appropriate long-term climate evaluation information is crucial. Therefore, we developed an innovative climate assessment system based on field investigations conducted in three cities located in Northern, Central, and Southern Taiwan. The field investigations included the questionnaire surveys and climate data collection. We first analyzed the relationship between the participants and climate parameters comprising physiologically equivalent temperature, air temperature, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, cloud cover, and precipitation. Second, we established the neutral value, comfort range, and dissatisfied range of each parameter. Third, after verifying that the subjects’ perception toward the climate parameters vary based on individual preferences, we developed the customized rating assessment of climate suitability (CRACS) approach, which featured functions such as personalized and default climate suitability information to be used by users exhibiting varying demands. Finally, we performed calculations using the climate conditions of two cities during the past 10 years to demonstrate the performance of the CRACS approach. The results can be used as a reference when planning activities in the city or when organizing future travel plans. The flexibility of the assessment system enables it to be adjusted for varying regions and usage characteristics.

Keywords

Climate information Thermal perception Dissatisfied range Rating assessment Taiwan 

References

  1. ASHRAE (2010) ASHRAE Standard 55-2010, thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998) Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build 27(1):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brager GS, Paliaga G, De Dear R, Olesen B, Wen J, Nicol F, Humphreys M (2004) Operable windows, personal control, and occupant comfort. ASHRAE Trans 110(2):17–35Google Scholar
  4. de Dear RJ, Pickup J (2000) An outdoor thermal comfort index (OUT_SET*): part II. Applications. In: de Dear RJ, Kalma JD, Oke TR, Auliciems A (eds) Biometeorology and urban climatology at the turn of the millenium. Selected papers from the ICB-ICUC’ 99 conference, Sydney, WCASP-50, WMO/TD No. 1026. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, pp ICB10.12.11-16Google Scholar
  5. de Freitas CR (2005) The climate–tourism relationship and its relevance to climate change impact assessment. In: Hall CM, Higham J (eds) Tourism, recreation and climate change. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, pp 29–43Google Scholar
  6. de Freitas CR, Scott D, McBoyle G (2008) A second generation climate index for tourism (CIT): specification and verification. Int J Biometeorol 52(5):399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eliasson I, Knez I, Westerberg U, Thorsson S, Lindberg F (2007) Climate and behaviour in a Nordic City. Landsc Urban Plan 82(1–2):72–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Feriadi H, Wong NH (2004) Thermal comfort for naturally ventilated houses in Indonesia. Energy Build 36(7):614–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiala D, Havenith G, Brode P, Kampmann B, Jendritzky G (2012) UTCI-Fiala multi-node model of human heat transfer and temperature regulation. Int J Biometeorol 56(3):429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gagge AP, Fobelets AP, Berglund LG (1986) A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment. ASHRAE Trans 92(pt 2B):709–731Google Scholar
  12. Gomez-Martin MB, Martinez-Ibarra E (2012) Tourism demand and atmospheric parameters: non-intrusive observation techniques. Clim Res 51(2):135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamilton JM (2004) Climate and the destination choice of German tourists. Fundazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Working Papers 21.04Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton JM, Lau MA (2005) The role of climate information in tourist destination choice decision-making. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Biometeorology (ICB 2005), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 9–5 September 2005, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach am Main 608–611Google Scholar
  15. Höppe P (1999) The physiological equivalent temperature — a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol 43(2):71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hwang RL, Lin TP (2007) Thermal comfort requirements for occupants of semi-outdoor and outdoor environments in hot-humid regions. Archit Sci Rev 50(4):60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jendritzky G, de Dear R, Havenith G (2012) UTCI—why another thermal index? Int J Biometeorol 56(3):421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karyono TH (2000) Report on thermal comfort and building energy studies in Jakarta-Indonesia. Build Environ 35(1):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin TP (2009) Thermal perception, adaptation and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Build Environ 44(10):2017–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin TP, Matzarakis A (2008) Tourism climate and thermal comfort in Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan. Int J Biometeorol 52(4):281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin TP, Matzarakis A (2011) Tourism climate information based on human thermal perception in Taiwan and Eastern China. Tour Manag 32(3):492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin TP, Hwang CC, Cheng HY (2006) The influence of climate information on travel arrangements. In: Proceedings of the 8th leisure, recreation and tourism research symposium, Taipei, 7 October 2006. Outdoor Recreation Association, 120–126Google Scholar
  23. Lin TP, de Dear R, Hwang RL (2011) Effect of thermal adaptation on seasonal outdoor thermal comfort. Int J Climatol 31(2):302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin TP, Tsai KT, Hwang RL, Matzarakis A (2012) Quantification of the effect of thermal indices and sky view factor on park attendance. Landsc Urban Plan 107(2):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin CH, Lin TP, Hwang RL (2013a) Thermal comfort for urban parks in subtropics: understanding visitor’s perceptions, behavior and attendance. Advances in Meteorology 2013Google Scholar
  26. Lin TP, Tsai KT, Liao CC, Huang YC (2013b) Effects of thermal comfort and adaptation on park attendance regarding different shading levels and activity types. Build Environ 59(1):599–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malama A, Sharples S, Pitts AC, Jitkhajornwanich K (1998) Investigation of the thermal comfort adaptive model in a tropical upland climate. ASHRAE Trans 104(1B):1194–1206Google Scholar
  28. Mateeva Z (2011) Personal factors of human thermal perception: long-lasting climate experience. Prace Stud Geograficzne 47:335–344Google Scholar
  29. Mateeva Z, Enache L, Mateeva N (2009) Bioclimatic effects on man and their assessment for the purposes of recreation and tourism. J Int Sci Publ Ecol Safety 3:524–536Google Scholar
  30. Matzarakis A (2006) Weather and climate related information for tourism. Tour Hosp Plann Dev 3:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matzarakis A (2014) Transfer of climate data for tourism applications — the climate—tourism/transfer-information-scheme. Sustain Environ Res 24(4):273–280Google Scholar
  32. Matzarakis A, Mayer H (1996) Another kind of environmental stress: thermal stress. WHO News 18:7–10Google Scholar
  33. Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H (2007) Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments - Application of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 51:323–334Google Scholar
  34. Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H (2010) Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: basics of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 54(2):131–139Google Scholar
  35. Mayer H, Höppe P (1987) Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theor Appl Climatol 38:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McIntyre DA (1980) Indoor climate. Applied Science Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Mieczkowski Z (1985) The tourism climate index: a method for evaluating world climates for tourism. Can Geogr 29:220–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nikolopoulou M, Lykoudis S (2006) Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: analysis across different European countries. Build Environ 41(11):1455–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nikolopoulou M, Lykoudis S (2007) Use of outdoor spaces and microclimate in a Mediterranean urban area. Build Environ 42(10):3691–3707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nikolopoulou M, Baker N, Steemers K (2001) Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: understanding the human parameter. Sol Energy 70(3):227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliveira S, Andrade H (2007) An initial assessment of the bioclimatic comfort in an outdoor public space in Lisbon. Int J Biometeorol 52(1):69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paciuk M (1990) The role of personal control of the environment in thermal comfort and satisfaction at the workplace. In: Selby R, Anthony K, Choi J, Orland B (eds) Coming of age. Environment Design Research Association 21, Oklahoma, pp 303–312Google Scholar
  43. Pickup J, de Dear RJ (2000) An outdoor thermal comfort index (OUT_SET*) — Part I — The model and its assumptions, In: de Dear RJ, Kalma JD, Oke TR, Auliciems A (eds) Biometeorology and urban climatology at the turn of the millenium. Selected papers from the ICB-ICUC’ 99 conference, Sydney, WCASP-50, WMO/TD No. 1026. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, pp ICB9.4.1–6Google Scholar
  44. Steadman RG (1971) Indices of windchill of clothed persons. J Appl Meteorol 10:674–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steadman RG (1979) The assessment of sultriness. Part I. A temperature–humidity index based on human physiology and clothing science. J Appl Meteorol 18:861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thom EC (1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorsson S, Lindqvist M, Lindqvist S (2004) Thermal bioclimatic conditions and patterns of behaviour in an urban park in Goteborg, Sweden. Int J Biometeorol 48(3):149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tung CH, Chen CP, Tsai KT, Kántor N, Hwang RL, Matzarakis A, Lin TP (2014) Outdoor thermal comfort characteristics in the hot and humid region from a gender perspective. Int J Biometeorol :1–13Google Scholar
  49. Zaninovic K, Matzarakis A (2009) The bioclimatological leaflet as a means conveying climatological information to tourists and the tourism industry. Int J Biometeorol 53(4):369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tzu-Ping Lin
    • 1
  • Shing-Ru Yang
    • 1
  • Andreas Matzarakis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Albert-Ludwigs-University FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations