International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 819–833 | Cite as

The influence of plants on atmospheric methane in an agriculture-dominated landscape

  • Xin ZhangEmail author
  • Xuhui Lee
  • Timothy J. Griffis
  • John M. Baker
  • Matt D. Erickson
  • Ning Hu
  • Wei Xiao
Original Paper


The primary objective of this study was to clarify the influence of crop plants on atmospheric methane (CH4) in an agriculture-dominated landscape in the Upper Midwest of the United States. Measurements were carried out at two contrasting scales. At the plant scale, CH4 fluxes from soybean and corn plants were measured with a laser-based plant chamber system. At the landscape scale, the land surface flux was estimated with a modified Bowen ratio technique using measurements made on a tall tower. The chamber data revealed a diurnal pattern for the plant CH4 flux: it was positive (an emission rate of 0.4 ± 0.1 nmol m−2 s−1, average of soybean and corn, in reference to the unit ground area) during the day, and negative (an uptake rate of −0.8 ± 0.8 nmol m−2 s−1) during the night. At the landscape scale, the flux was estimated to be 14.8 nmol m−2 s−1 at night and highly uncertain during the day, but the available references and the flux estimates from the equilibrium methods suggested that the CH4 flux during the entire observation period was similar to the estimated nighttime flux. Thus, soybean and corn plants have a negligible role in the landscape-scale CH4 budget.


Methane Corn Soybean Agriculture Land surface flux Footprint analysis 



We would like to thank the University of Minnesota UMore Park for use of the facilities. Funding was provided by the Ministry of Education of China (grant PCSIRT), the Rice Family Foundation, the Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies, and USDA NIFA/2010-65112-20528.


  1. Adviento-Borbe MAA, Haddix ML, Binder DL, Walters DT, Dobermann A (2007) Soil greenhouse gas fluxes and global warming potential in four high-yielding maize systems. Glob Chang Biol 13:1972–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alluvione F, Halvorson AD, Del Grosso SJ (2009) Nitrogen, tillage, and crop rotation effects on carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from irrigated cropping systems. J Environ Qual 38:2023–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker JM, Griffis TJ (2005) Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques. Agric For Meteorol 128:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bavin TK, Griffis TJ, Baker JM, Venterea RT (2009) Impact of reduced tillage and cover cropping on the greenhouse gas budget of amaize/soybean rotation ecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134:234–242Google Scholar
  5. Beerling DJ, Gardiner T, Leggett G, McLeod A, Quick WP (2008) Missing methane emissions from leaves of terrestrial plants. Glob Chang Biol 14:1821–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowling DR, Miller JB, Rhodes ME, Burns SP, Monson RK, Baer D (2009) Soil, plant, and transport influences on methane in a subalpine forest under high ultraviolet irradiance. Biogeosciences 6:1311–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruhn D, Mikkelsen TN, Willats WGT, Ambus P (2009)Effects of temperature, ultraviolet radiation and pectin methylesterase on aerobic methane release from plant material. PlantBiol 11:43–48, doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00202.x Google Scholar
  8. Bruhn D, Moller IM, Mikkelsen TN, Ambus P (2012) Terrestrial plant methane production and emission. Physiol Plant 144:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butenhoff CL, Khalil MAK (2007) Global methane emissions from terrestrial plants. Environ Sci Technol 41:4032–4037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dueck T, van der Werf A (2008) Are plants precursors for methane? New Phytol 178:693–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dueck TA, de Visser R, Poorter H, Persijn S, Gorissen A, de Visser W, Schapendonk A, Verhagen J, Snel J, Harren FJM, Ngai AKY, Verstappen F, Bouwmeester H, Voesenek L, van der Werf A (2007) No evidence for substantial aerobic methane emission by terrestrial plants: a C-13-labelling approach. New Phytol 175:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferretti DF, Miller JB, White JWC, Lassey KR, Lowe DC, Etheridge DM (2007) Stable isotopes provide revised global limits of aerobic methane emissions from plants. Atmos Chem Phys 7:237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffis TJ, Lee X, Baker JM, Sargent SD, King JY (2005) Feasibility of quantifying ecosystem-atmosphere (COO)-O-18-O-16 exchange using laser spectroscopy and the flux-gradient method. Agric For Meteorol 135:44–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffis TJ, Baker JM, Sargent SD, Erickson M, Corcoran J, Chen M, Billmark K (2010) Influence of C-4 vegetation on (CO2)-C-13 discrimination and isoforcing in the upper Midwest, United States. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendriks DMD, van Huissteden J, Dolman AJ (2010) Multi-technique assessment of spatial and temporal variability of methane fluxes in a peat meadow. Agric For Meteorol 150:757–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houweling S, Rockmann T, Aben I, Keppler F, Krol M, Meirink JF, Dlugokencky EJ, Frankenberg C (2006) Atmospheric constraints on global emissions of methane from plants. Geophys Res Lett 33, L15821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacinthe PA, Lal R (2003) Nitrogen fertilization of wheat residue affecting nitrous oxide and methane emission from a central Ohio Luvisol. Biol Fertil Soils 37:338–347Google Scholar
  18. Johnson JMF, Archer D, Barbour N (2010) Greenhouse gas emission from contrasting management scenarios in the northern corn belt. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:396–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karlen DL, Duffy MD, Colvin TS (1995) Nutrient, labor, energy, and economic evaluations of two farming systems in Iowa. J Prod Agric 8:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelliher FM, Reisinger AR, Martin RJ, Harvey MJ, Price SJ, Sherlock RR (2002) Measuring nitrous oxide emission rate from grazed pasture using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in the nocturnal boundary layer. Agric For Meteorol 111:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keppler F, Hamilton JTG, Brass M, Rockmann T (2006) Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 439:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keppler F, Boros M, Frankenberg C, Lelieveld J, McLeod A, Pirttila AM, Rockmann T, Schnitzler JP (2009) Methane formation in aerobic environments. Environ Chem 6:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirschbaum MUF, Walcroft A (2008) No detectable aerobic methane efflux from plant material, nor from adsorption/desorption processes. Biogeosciences 5:1551–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kroon PS, Hensen A, Jonker HJJ, Zahniser MS, van’t Veen WH, Vermeulen AT (2007) Suitability of quantum cascade laser spectroscopy for CH4 and N2O eddy covariance flux measurements. Biogeosciences 4:715–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Le Mer J, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol 37:25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin JC, Gerbig C, Wofsy SC, Andrews AE, Daube BC, Davis KJ, Grainger CA (2003) A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108(D16):4493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu LL, Greaver TL (2009) A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: the CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission. Ecol Lett 12:1103–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Logan JA, Prather MJ, Wofsy JC, McElroy MB (1981) Tropospheric chemistry: a global perspective. J Geophys Res 86:7210–7254Google Scholar
  29. Long KD, Flanagan LB, Cai T (2010) Diurnal and seasonal variation in methane emissions in a northern Canadian peatland measured by eddy covariance. Glob Chang Biol 16:2420–2435Google Scholar
  30. McLeod AR, Fry SC, Loake GJ, Messenger DJ, Reay DS, Smith KA, Yun BW (2008) Ultraviolet radiation drives methane emissions from terrestrial plant pectins. New Phytol 180:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyers TP, Hall ME, Lindberg SE, Kim K (1996) Use of the modified Bowen-ratio technique to measure fluxes of trace gases. Atmos Environ 30:3321–3329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mosher BW, Czepiel PM, Harriss RC, Shorter JH, Kolb CE, McManus JB, Allwine E, Lamb BK (1999) Methane emissions at nine landfill sites in the northeastern United States. Environ Sci Technol 33:2088–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Reule CA, Liu XJJ (2006) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado. J Environ Qual 35:1584–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakagawa F, Tsunogai U, Komatsu DD, Yamada K, Yoshida N, Moriizumi J, Nagamine K, Iida T, Ikebe Y (2005) Automobile exhaust as a source of C-13- and D-enriched atmospheric methane in urban areas. Org Geochem 36:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nisbet RER, Fisher R, Nimmo RH, Bendall DS, Crill PM, Gallego-Sala AV, Hornibrook ERC, Lopez-Juez E, Lowry D, Nisbet PBR, Shuckburgh EF, Sriskantharajah S, Howe CJ, Nisbet EG (2009) Emission of methane from plants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Omonode RA, Vyn TJ, Smith DR, Hegymegi P, Gal A (2007) Soil carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from long-term tillage systems in continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations. Soil Tillage Res 95:182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parsons AJ, Newton PCD, Clark H, Kelliher FM (2006) Scaling methane emissions from vegetation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pattey E, Strachan IB, Desjardins RL, Edwards GC, Dow D, MacPherson JI (2006) Application of a tunable diode laser to the measurement of CH4 and N2O fluxes from field to landscape scale using several micrometeorological techniques. Agric For Meteorol 136:222–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qaderi MM, Reid DM (2011) Stressed crops emit more methane despite the mitigating effects of elevated carbon dioxide. Funct Plant Biol 38:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raghoebarsing AA, Smolders AJP, Schmid MC, Rijpstra WIC, Wolters-Arts M, Derksen J, Jetten MSM, Schouten S, Damste JSS, Lamers LPM, Roelofs JGM, den Camp HJMO, Strous M (2005) Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for photosynthesis in peat bogs. Nature 436(7054):1153–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shurpali NJ, Verma SB (1998) Micrometeorological measurements of methane flux in a Minnesota peatland during two growing seasons. Biogeochemistry 40:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shurpali NJ, Verma SB, Clement RJ, Billesbach DP (1993) Seasonal distribution of methane flux in a Minnesota peatland measured by eddy-correlation. J Geophys Res Atmos 98:20649–20655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smeets C, Holzinger R, Vigano I, Goldstein AH, Rockmann T (2009) Eddy covariance methane measurements at a Ponderosa pine plantation in California. Atmos Chem Phys 9:8365–8375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sundqvist E, Crill P, Mölder M, Vestin P, Lindroth A (2012) Atmospheric methane removal by boreal plants. Geophys Res Lett 39:L21806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suwanwaree P, Robertson GP (2005) Methane oxidation in forest, successional, and no-till agricultural ecosystems: Effects of nitrogen and soil disturbance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1722–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United States Department of Agriculture (2009) US Summary and State Data 2007 Census. Rep Agric 1:7–16Google Scholar
  47. Ussiri DAN, Lal R, Jarecki MK (2009) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from long-term tillage under a continuous corn cropping system in Ohio. Soil Tillage Res 104:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vigano I, van Weelden H, Holzinger R, Keppler F, McLeod A, Rockmann T (2008) Effect of UV radiation and temperature on the emission of methane from plant biomass and structural components. Biogeosciences 5:937–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vigano I, Holzinger R, Rockmann T, van Dijk A, Keppler F, Greule M, Brand WA, van Weelden H, van Dongen J (2009) UV light induces methane emission from plant biomass: mechanism and isotope studies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:A1382–A1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang YS, Xue M, Zheng XH, Ji BM, Du R, Wang YF (2005) Effects of environmental factors on N2O emission from and CH4 uptake by the typical grasslands in the Inner Mongolia. Chemosphere 58:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang ZP, Han XG, Wang GG, Song Y, Gulledge J (2008) Aerobic methane emission from plants in the Inner Mongolia steppe. Environ Sci Technol 42:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang ZP, Gulledge J, Zheng JQ, Liu W, Li LH, Han XG (2009) Physical injury stimulates aerobic methane emissions from terrestrial plants. Biogeosciences 6:615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang ZP, Keppler F, Greule M, Hamilton JTG (2011) Non-microbial methane emissions from fresh leaves: effects of physical wounding and anoxia. Atmos Environ 45:4915–4921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Werner C, Davis K, Bakwin P, Yi CX, Hurst D, Lock L (2003) Regional-scale measurements of CH4 exchange from a tall tower over a mixed temperate/boreal lowland and wetland forest. Glob Chang Biol 9:1251–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wishkerman A, Greiner S, Ghyczy M, Boros M, Rausch T, Lenhart K, Keppler F (2011) Enhanced formation of methane in plant cell cultures by inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase. Plant Cell Environ 34:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang X (2013) Improving regional-scale greenhouse gas inventories in an agriculturedominated landscape using a multi-scale approach. PhD Dissertation, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao CF, Andrews AE, Bianco L, Eluszkiewicz J, Hirsch A, MacDonald C, Nehrkorn T, Fischer ML (2009) Atmospheric inverse estimates of methane emissions from Central California. J Geophys Res Atmos 114, D16302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimnoch M, Godlowska J, Necki JM, Rozanski K (2010) Assessing surface fluxes of CO2 and CH4 in urban environment: a reconnaissance study in Krakow, Southern Poland. Tellus Ser B Chem Phys Meteorol 62:573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xuhui Lee
    • 1
  • Timothy J. Griffis
    • 2
  • John M. Baker
    • 3
  • Matt D. Erickson
    • 2
  • Ning Hu
    • 4
  • Wei Xiao
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Soil, Water, and ClimateUniversity of MinnesotaSt PaulUSA
  3. 3.Agricultural Research ServiceUSDASt PaulUSA
  4. 4.Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, College of Applied MeteorologyNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations