Skip to main content
Log in

Temperature characteristics of winter roost-sites for birds and mammals: tree cavities and anthropogenic alternatives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The microclimate of potential roost-sites is likely to be a crucial determinant in the optimal roost-site selection of endotherms, in particular during the winter season of temperate zones. Available roost-sites for birds and mammals in European high trunk orchards are mainly tree cavities, wood stacks and artificial nest boxes. However, little is known about the microclimatic patterns inside cavities and thermal advantages of using these winter roost-sites. Here, we simultaneously investigate the thermal patterns of winter roost-sites in relation to winter ambient temperature and their insulation capacity. While tree cavities and wood stacks strongly buffered the daily cycle of temperature changes, nest boxes showed low buffering capacity. The buffering effect of tree cavities was stronger at extreme ambient temperatures compared to temperatures around zero. Heat sources inside roosts amplified Δ T (i.e., the difference between inside and outside temperatures), particularly in the closed roosts of nest boxes and tree cavities, and less in the open wood stacks with stronger circulation of air. Positive Δ T due to the installation of a heat source increased in cold ambient temperatures. These results suggest that orchard habitats in winter show a spatiotemporal mosaic of sites providing different thermal benefits varying over time and in relation to ambient temperatures. At cold temperatures tree cavities provide significantly higher thermal benefits than nest boxes or wood stacks. Thus, in winter ecology of hole-using endotherms, the availability of tree cavities may be an important characteristic of winter habitat quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates D (2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R—using lme4 package. R News 5:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjurman J, Wadsö L (2000) Microcalorimetric measurements of metabolic activity of six decay fungi on spruce wood as a function of temperature. Mycologia 92:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock A (2011) Roosting site selection of little owls (Athene noctua) in Southern Germany. BSc thesis, University of Marburg

  • Buttemer WA (1985) Energy relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis). Oecologia 68:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey AB, Wilson TM, Maguire CC, Biswell BL (1997) Dens of Northern flying squirrels in the Pacific Northwest. J Wildl Manag 61:684–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane D, Orcutt GH (1949) Application of least squares regression to relationships containing autocorrelated error terms. J Am Stat Assoc 44:32–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs SB, Bowman J, Garroway CJ (2010) Thermal properties of tree cavities during winter in a northern hardwood forest. J Wildl Manag 74:1875–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SJ (1999) The thermal and energetic significance of cavity roosting in mountain chickadees and juniper titmice. Condor 101:863–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis MA, Williams JB (1994) Communal roosting in green woodhoopoes: consequences for energy expenditure and the seasonal patterns of mortality. Auk 111:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis MA, Weathers WW, Koenig WD (1994) Energetic benefits of communal roosting by acorn woodpeckers during the nonbreeding season. Condor 96:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards TC (1987) Standard rate of metabolism in the common barn owl (Tyto alba). Wilson Bull 99:704–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JW, Nijland MJ, Bennett NC (2002) Simple roost nests confer large energetic savings for sparrow-weavers. J Comp Physiol B 172:137–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furrington H (1979) Eine Röhre schützt vor dem Marder—Nisthilfen für Steinkauz. Wir und die Vögel 11:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganey JL, Balda RP, King RM (1993) Metabolic rate and evaporative water loss of Mexican spotted and great horned owls. Wilson Bull 105:645–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk TK, Ekschmitt K, Wolters V (2011) Efficient placement of nest boxes for the little owl (Athene noctua). J Raptor Res 45:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havera SP (1979) Temperature variation in a fox squirrel nest box. J Wildl Manag 43:251–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooge PN, Stanback MT, Koenig WD (1999) Nest-site selection in the Acorn Woodpecker. Auk 116:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeigh SC (1961) Energy of birds conserved by roosting in cavities. Wilson Bull 73:140–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaus P, Graf R, Guélat J, Keller V, Schmid H, Zbinden N (2011) Historischer Brutvogelatlas. Die Verbreitung der Schweizer Brutvögel seit 1950. Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristín A, Mihal I, Urban P (2001) Roosting of the great tit, Parus major and the nuthatch, Sitta eruopaea in nest boxes in an oak-hornbeam forest. Folia Zool 50:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpfer C, Balko J (2010) Streuobstwiesen in Baden-Württemberg—Wie viele Obstbäume wachsen im Land und in welchem Zustand sind sie? Horizonte 35:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptions for breeding in birds. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempaszak U (1988) Roosting of hole birds in the orchard. Prz Zool 32:247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring MC (2011) The use of nestboxes by roosting birds during the non-breeding season: a review of the costs and benefits. Ardea 99:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand PJ (1996) Life in the cold: an introduction to winter ecology, 3rd edn. University Press of New England, Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty DJ, Moncrieff JB, Taylor IR (2001) How much energy do barn owls (Tyto alba) save by roosting? J Therm Biol 26:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComb WC, Noble RE (1981) Microclimates of nest boxes and natural cavities in bottomland hardwoods. J Wildl Manag 45:284–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (2002) The physiological ecology of vertebrates: a view from energetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Mols CMM, Visser ME (2007) Great tits (Parus major) reduce caterpillar damage in commercial apple orchards. PLoS One 2:e202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1994a) Experiments on the limitation of bird breeding densities: a review. Ibis 136:397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1994b) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol Conserv 70:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Paclík M, Weidinger K (2007) Microclimate of tree cavities during winter nights—implications for roost site selection in birds. Int J Biometeorol 51:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinowski J, Haman A, Jerzak I, Pinowska B, Barkowska M, Grodzki A, Haman K (2006) The thermal properties of some nests of the Eurasian tree sparrow Passer montanus. J Therm Biol 31:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes B, O’Donnell C, Jamieson I (2009) Microclimate of natural cavity nests and its implications for a threatened secondary-cavity-nesting passerine of New Zealand, the South Island saddleback. Condor 111:462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgeley JA (2001) Winter activity in the tree-roosting lesser short-tailed bat, Mystacina tuberculata, in a cold-temperate climate in New Zealand. Acta Chiropterol 3:179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbill C, Geiser F (2008) Hibernation by tree-roosting bats. J Comp Physiol B 178:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Nieuwenhuyse D, Génot JC, Johnson DH (2008) The little owl. Conservation, ecology and behavior of Athene noctua. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Velký M, Kanuch P, Kristín A (2010) Selection of winter roosts in the Great Tit Parus major: influence of microclimate. J Ornithol 151:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsberg GE (1986) Thermal consequences of roost-site selection: the relative importance of three models of heat conservation. Auk 103:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers WW, Hodum PJ, Blakesley JA (2001) Thermal ecology and ecological energetics of California spotted owls. Condor 103:678–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe KL (2001) Microclimate of tree cavity nests: is it important for reproductive success in northern flickers? Auk 118:412–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma P, Piersma T (1994) Effects of microhabitat, flocking, climate and migratory goal on energy expenditure in the annual cycle of red knots. Condor 96:257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkel W, Huddle H (1988) Nest-box roosting of birds in winter. Vogelwarte 34:174–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf BO, Walsberg GE (1996) Thermal effects of radiation and wind on a small bird and implication for microsite selection. Ecology 77:2228–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingg S, Arlettaz R, Schaub M (2010) Nestbox design influences territory occupancy and reproduction in a declining, secondary cavity-breeding bird. Ardea 98:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance in the field of V. Michel and M. Perrig. We thank H. Keil for permission to work in the core areas of his little owl conservation project and for the friendly introduction, and E. Keil for her kind hospitality. This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 3100A 132951/1 to B. Naef-Daenzer and M. U. Grüebler), the Hirschmann foundation, and the Karl Mayer foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin U. Grüebler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grüebler, M.U., Widmer, S., Korner-Nievergelt, F. et al. Temperature characteristics of winter roost-sites for birds and mammals: tree cavities and anthropogenic alternatives. Int J Biometeorol 58, 629–637 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0643-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0643-1

Keywords

Navigation