Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1621–1631 | Cite as

Spatial variation in specific leaf area and horizontal distribution of leaf area in juvenile western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.)

  • G. M. WilliamsEmail author
  • A. S. Nelson
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Models were developed to predict spatial distribution of specific leaf area (SLA) and horizontal distribution of leaf area for western larch. Cardinal branch direction significantly influenced both SLA and horizontal leaf area distributions.

Abstract

Leaf area, specific leaf area (SLA), and their spatial distribution in the crown are important indicators of biological response to changes in growing conditions including light and water availability. Western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) is a deciduous coniferous pioneer species in the U.S. Inland Northwest known for its rapid growth, high-quality wood, and ecological importance. Analysis with nonlinear models revealed that SLA and horizontal leaf area distributions differ between cardinal quadrants of juvenile western larch crowns. SLA was significantly higher in the more illuminated, southern side of the crown, and leaf area peaked closer to the stem in the southwest quadrant. Similar to other conifers, horizontal distributions of foliage in western larch also shifted further outward towards the branch tips with increasing depth in the crown. Models developed for horizontal distribution of leaf area and spatial distribution of specific leaf area for western larch may be extended by future researchers to predict its response to environmental variables or management practices.

Keywords

Biomass Shade intolerance Probability density function Nonlinear mixed-effects model Inland Northwest Leaf economics Morphological plasticity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the University of Idaho, College of Natural Resources and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project under accession number 1008381. Jacob Reely, Jonathan Cherico, and Michael Skandalis contributed to data collection. We also acknowledge Mark Coleman and Randall Brooks for their helpful critiques of the original manuscript, and Daniel Johnson for insights into stomatal response among western conifers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

468_2018_1738_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 13 KB)
468_2018_1738_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 11 KB)
468_2018_1738_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 16 KB)
468_2018_1738_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 14 KB)
468_2018_1738_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (XLSX 12 KB)

References

  1. Anfodillo T, Rento S, Carraro V, Furlanetto L, Urbinati C, Carrer M (1998) Tree water relations and climatic variations at the alpine timberline: seasonal changes of sap flux and xylem water potential in Larix decidua Miller, Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus cembra L. Ann Sci Forest 55(1–2):159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arno SF, Smith HY, Krebs MA (1997) Old growth ponderosa pine and western larch stand structures: influence of pre-1900 fires and fire exclusion. INT-RP-495. US Dept of Agriculture, Intermountain Research StationGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond BJ, Farnsworth BT, Coulombe RA, Winner WE (1999) Foliage physiology and biochemistry in response to light gradients in conifers with varying shade tolerance. Oecologia 120(2):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley DS, Zasada JC, Tappeiner IIJC, Stone DM (1997) Plant morphological characteristics as a tool in monitoring response to silvicultural activities. In: Communicating the role of silviculture in managing the national forests: Proceedings of the National Silviculture Workshop. Warren, PA, 19–22 May 1997. GTR-NE-238. Northeast Forest Experimental Station, Forest Service, US Dept of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  5. Chabot BF, Hicks DJ (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13(1):229–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen HY, Klinka K (1998) Survival, growth, and allometry of planted Larix occidentalis seedlings in relation to light availability. Forest Ecol Manag 106(2):169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen HY, Klinka K, Kayahara GJ (1996) Effects of light on growth, crown architecture, and s pecific leaf area for naturally established Pinus contorta var. latifolia and Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca saplings. Can J For Res 26(7):1149–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clawges R, Vierling L, Calhoon M, Toomey M (2007) Use of a ground-based scanning lidar for estimation of biophysical properties of western larch (Larix occidentalis). Int J Remote Sens 28(19):4331–4344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (1993) Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. Oecologia 96(2):169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fellner H, Dirnberger GF, Sterba H (2016) Specific leaf area of European Larch (Larix decidua Mill.). Trees 30:1237–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forrester DI, Tachauer IHH, Annighoefer P, Barbeito I, Pretzsch H, Ruiz-Peinado R, Stark H, Vacchiano G, Zlatanov T, Chakraborty T, Saha S (2017) Generalized biomass and leaf area allometric equations for European tree species incorporating stand structure, tree age and climate. For Ecol Manag 396:160–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goudie JW, Parish R, Antos JA (2016) Foliage biomass and specific leaf area equations at the branch, annual shoot and whole-tree levels for lodgepole pine and white spruce in British Columbia. Forest Ecol Manag 361:286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gower ST, Reich PB, Son Y (1993) Canopy dynamics and aboveground production of five tree species with different leaf longevities. Tree Physiol 12(4):327–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gulmon SL, Chu CC (1981) The effects of light and nitrogen on photosynthesis, leaf characteristics, and dry matter allocation in the chaparral shrub, Diplacus aurantiacus Oecologia 49(2):207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins SS, Black RA, Radamaker GK, Bidlake WR (1987) Gas exchange characteristics and water relations of Larix occidentalis. Can J For Res 17(11):1364–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horn HS (1971) The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibrahim L, Proe MF, Cameron AD (1998) Interactive effects of nitrogen and water availabilities on gas exchange and whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar. Tree Physiol 18:481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishii H, Ford ED, Boscolo ME, Manriquez AC, Wilson ME, Hinckley TM (2002) Variation in specific needle area of old-growth Douglas-fir in relation to needle age, within-crown position and epicormic shoot production. Tree Physiol 22(1):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jurik TW (1986) Temporal and spatial patterns of specific leaf weight in successional northern hardwood tree species. Am J Bot 73(8):1083–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kershaw JA, Maguire DA (1996) Crown structure in western hemlock, Douglas-fir, and grand fir in western Washington: horizontal distribution of foliage within branches. Can J For Res 26:128–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kloeppel BD, Gower ST, Treichel IW, Kharuk S (1998) Foliar carbon isotope discrimination in Larix species and sympatric evergreen conifers: a global comparison. Oecologia 114(2):153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marshall JD, Monserud RA (2003) Foliage height influences specific leaf area of three conifer species. Can J For Res 33:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matyssek R, Schulze ED (1987) Heterosis in hybrid larch (Larix decidua × leptolepis). I. The role of leaf characteristics. Trees 1(4):219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McClelland BR, Frissell SS, Fischer WC, Halvorson CH (1979) Habitat management for hole-nesting birds in forests of western larch and Douglas-fir. J For 77(8):480–483Google Scholar
  25. Myers BJ, Benyon RG, Theiveyanathan S, Smith CJ, Smith CJ, Falkiner RA (1998) Response of effluent-irrigated Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus radiata to salinity and vapor pressure deficits. Tree Physiol 18:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niinemets Ü (1996) Plant growth-form alters the relationship between foliar morphology and species shade-tolerance ranking in temperate woody taxa. Vegetatio 124(2):145–153Google Scholar
  27. Niinemets Ü, Kull K (1994) Leaf weight per area and leaf size of 85 Estonian woody species in relation to shade tolerance and light availability. For Ecol Manag 70:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Niinemets Ü, Kull O (1995) Effects of light availability and tree size on the architecture of assimilative surface in the canopy of Picea abies: variation in shoot structure. Tree Physiol 15(12):791–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1990) Forest stand dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Oren R, Schulze ED, Matyssek R, Zimmermann R (1986) Estimating photosynthetic rate and annual carbon gain in conifers from specific leaf weight and leaf biomass. Oecologia 70(2):187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Osnas JL, Lichstein JW, Reich PB, Pacala SW (2013) Global leaf trait relationships: mass, area, and the leaf economics spectrum. Science 340(6133):741–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perrin PM, Mitchell FJ (2013) Effects of shade on growth, biomass allocation and leaf morphology in European yew (Taxus baccata L.). Eur J Forest Res 132(2):211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips JG, Riha SJ (1993) Canopy development and solar conversion efficiency in Acacia auriculiformis under drought stress. Tree Physiol 12:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Core Team R (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 18 Apr 2017
  35. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 18 Apr 2017
  36. Rehfeldt GE, Jaquish BC (2010) Ecological impacts and management strategies for western larch in the face of climate-change. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 15:283–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. PNAS 94(25):13730–13734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richards JH, Bliss LC (1986) Winter water relations of a deciduous timberline conifer. Larix lyallii Parl Oecol 69(1):16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt WC, Shearer RC (1990) Western larch (Larix occidentalis). In: Burns RM, Honkala B (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 1. Conifers. Agricultural Handbook 654. Forest Service, US Dept of Agriculture, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott G, Mahalovich MF, Rinehart S, Krueger J (2013) Reforestation-revegetation climate change primer for the northern region: incorporating climate change impacts into reforestation and revegetation prescriptions. Forest Service, US Dept of Agriculture. http://ecoadapt.org/data/documents/Reforestation-Revegetation_Primer_Final.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2017
  41. Sellin A, Kupper P (2006) Spatial variation in sapwood area to leaf area ratio and specific leaf area within a crown of silver birch. Trees 20(3):311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stenberg P, Smolander H, Kellomäki S (1993) Description of crown structure for light interception models: angular and spatial distribution of shoots in young Scots pine. Stud For Suec 191:43–50Google Scholar
  43. Stenberg P, Kuuluvainen T, Kellomäki S, Grace JC, Jokela EJ, Gholz HL (1994) Crown structure, light interception and productivity of pine trees and stands. Ecol Bulletins 43:20–34Google Scholar
  44. Tardieu F, Granier C, Muller B (1999) Modelling leaf expansion in a fluctuating environment: are changes in specific leaf area a consequence of changes in expansion rate? New Phytol 143:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Temesgen H, Weiskittel AR (2006) Leaf mass per area relationships across light gradients in hybrid spruce crowns. Trees 20(4):522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Temesgen H, LeMay VM, Cameron IR (2003) Bivariate distribution functions for predicting twig leaf area within hybrid spruce crowns. Can J For Res 33:2044–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Hees AFM, Bartelink HH (1993) Needle area relationships of Scots pine in the Netherlands. Forest Ecol Manag 58(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang YP, Jarvis PG, Benson ML (1990) Two-dimensional needle-area density distribution within the crowns of Pinus radiata. Forest Ecol Manag 32:217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiskittel AR, Temesgen H, Wilson DS, Maguire DA (2008) Sources of within- and between-stand variability in specific leaf area of three ecologically distinct conifer species. Ann Forest Sci 65:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weiskittel AR, Kershaw JA, Hofmeyer PV, Seymour RS (2009) Species differences in total and vertical distribution of branch- and tree-level leaf area for the five primary conifer species in Maine, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 258:1695–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams GM, Nelson AS, Affleck DL (2017) Vertical distribution of foliar biomass in western larch (Larix occidentalis). Can J For Res 48(1):42–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Flexas J et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428(6985):821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu M, Harrington TB (1998) Foliage biomass distribution of loblolly pine as affected by tree dominance, crown size, and stand characteristics. Can J For Res 28:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhao X, Wang X (2004) Study on branching pattern plasticity of Larix chinensis. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 25(1):113–117Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest, Rangeland and Fire ScienceUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations