Trees

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Warming results in advanced spring phenology, delayed leaf fall, and developed abnormal shoots in Pinus densiflora seedlings

  • Hanna Chang
  • Seung Hyun Han
  • Jiae An
  • Min Ji Park
  • Yowhan Son
Short Communication
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Key message In an evergreen species with fixed-growth, warming advanced budburst but not leaf appearance and growth, and the further developed abnormal shoots by warming indicates extended growing season instead of leaf fall.

Abstract We investigated the effects of warming and precipitation manipulation on phenology (spring phenology, leaf fall, and abnormal shoot phenology) in Pinus densiflora, which is an evergreen species with fixed-growth. In an open-air nursery, 2-year-old P. densiflora seedlings were planted in April 2013 and treated with 6 treatments (n = 3) [2 temperature levels: + 3 °C (TW) and control (TC); 3 precipitation levels: + 30% (PI), − 30% (PD), and control (PC)]. We observed spring and abnormal shoot phenology in 2014 and 2015, and measured dry weight of fallen leaves in 2015. Phenology was not changed by precipitation manipulation. In spring phenology, budburst was advanced by 9.4–9.6 days under warming, but timing of leaf appearance and growth did not changed. Cumulative weight of fallen leaves was 25.8–28.6% lower in TW plots than in TC plots between July and December 2015. There were no significant differences in occurrence rates of abnormal shoots among plots. 65.7–96.8% of abnormal shoots remained at the budburst stage in TC plots, while abnormal shoots in TW plots further developed to the leaf appearance and growth stages. Abnormal shoot development stopped 10.5–28.8 days later in TW plots than the TC plots in 2014 and 2015. Effects of warming were evident only in budburst, because leaf appearance and growth were affected by fixed-growth characteristics as well as warming. Decreased leaf fall and further developed abnormal shoots could be interpreted as delayed leaf senescence and extended growing season, respectively, for an evergreen species with fixed-growth.

Keywords

Abnormal shoot Budburst Leaf fall Pinus densiflora Precipitation manipulation Warming 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Korea Forest Service (2017058A00-1719-AB01) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013R1A1A2012242).

Compliance of ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Badeck FW, Bondeau A, Böttcher K, Doktor D, Lucht W, Schaber J, Sitch S (2004) Responses of spring phenology to climate change. New Phytol 162:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bronson DR, Gower ST, Tanner M, Van Herk I (2009) Effect of ecosystem warming on boreal black spruce bud burst and shoot growth. Glob Change Biol 15:1534–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner AM, Varkonyi-Gasic E, Jones RC (2017) Phase change and phenology in trees. In: Groover A (ed) Comparative and evolutionary genomics of angiosperm trees, Springer, Cham, pp 227–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chmielewski FM, Rötzer T (2001) Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agric For Meteorol 108:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi Y (2014) Korean climate change assessment report 2014. Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul (In Korean)Google Scholar
  6. Chung H, Muraoka H, Nakamura M, Han S, Muller O, Son Y (2013) Experimental warming studies on tree species and forest ecosystems: a literature review. J Plant Res 126:447–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Danby RK, Hik DS (2007) Responses of white spruce (Picea glauca) to experimental warming at a subarctic alpine treeline. Glob Change Biol 13:437–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Barba D, Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Morin H (2016) Effects of soil warming and nitrogen foliar applications on bud burst of black spruce. Trees 30:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Estrella N, Menzel A (2006) Responses of leaf colouring in four deciduous tree species to climate and weather in Germany. Clim Res 32:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han S, Chung H, Noh NJ, Lee SJ, Jo W, Yoon TK, Yi K, Park C, Ko S, Son Y (2014) Effect of open-field experimental warming on the leaf phenology of oriental oak (Quercus variabilis) seedlings. J Plant Ecol 7:559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han SH, Kim S, Li G, Chang H, Yun SJ, An J, Son Y (2018) Effects of warming and precipitation manipulation on fine root dynamics of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. seedlings. Forests.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f9010014 Google Scholar
  12. Hänninen H (2006) Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. Tree Physiol 26:889–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker T (ed) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 33–118Google Scholar
  14. Jang W, Keyes CR, Running SW, Lim JH, Park PS (2015) Climate–growth relationships of relict Picea jezoensis at Mt. Gyebang, South Korea. For Sci Tech 11:19–26Google Scholar
  15. Juknys R, Žeimavičius K, Sujetovienė G, Gustainytė J (2012) Response of tree seasonal development to climate warming. Pol J Environ Stud 21:107–113Google Scholar
  16. Khaine I, Woo SY (2015) An overview of interrelationship between climate change and forests. For Sci Tech 11:11–18Google Scholar
  17. Kim IS, Ryu KO, Lee JW (2012) Climatic factors affecting bud flush timing of Pinus densiflora provenances. Korean J Agric For Meteorol 14:229–235 (In Korean with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Korea Forest Service (2012) Creation and management of forest resources act. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon (In Korean)Google Scholar
  19. Korea Meteorological Administration (2018) Climate information portal. http://www.climate.go.kr/personal_RCP/new/korea_step1.php. Accessed 2 April 2018
  20. Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (2012) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Kramer K, Leinonen I, Loustau D (2000) The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: an overview. Int J Biometeorol 44:67–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kushida T (2005) Effect of high summer temperatures on lammas shoot elongation and flowering in Japanese red pine. Phyton 45:215–221Google Scholar
  23. Lee CS, Song HG, Kim HS, Lee B, Pi JH, Cho YC, Seol ES, Oh WS, Park SA, Lee SM (2007) Which environmental factors caused lammas shoot growth of Korean red pine? J Ecol Environ 30:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Linderholm HW (2006) Growing season changes in the last century. Agric For Meteorol 137:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu C, Westman CJ, Berg B, Kutsch W, Wang GZ, Man R, Ilvesniemi H (2004) Variation in litterfall-climate relationships between coniferous and broadleaf forests in Eurasia. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Menzel A, Fabian P (1999) Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397:659–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová R, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Misson L, Degueldre D, Collin C, Rodriguez R, Rocheteau A, Ourcival J, Rambal S (2011) Phenological responses to extreme droughts in a Mediterranean forest. Glob Change Biol 17:1036–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morin X, Lechowicz MJ, Augspurger C, O’Keefe J, Viner D, Chuine I (2009) Leaf phenology in 22 North American tree species during the 21st century. Glob Change Biol 15:961–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morin X, Roy J, Sonié L, Chuine I (2010) Changes in leaf phenology of three European oak species in response to experimental climate change. New Phytol 186:900–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mutke S, Gordo J, Climent J, Gil L (2003) Shoot growth and phenology modelling of grafted stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) in inner Spain. Ann For Sci 60:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norby RJ, Hartz-Rubin JS, Verbrugge MJ (2003) Phenological responses in maple to experimental atmospheric warming and CO2 enrichment. Glob Change Biol 9:1792–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olszyk D, Wise C, Van Ess E, Apple M, Tingey D (1998) Phenology and growth of shoots, needles, and buds of douglas-fir seedlings with elevated CO2 and (or) temperature. Can J Bot 76:1991–2001Google Scholar
  34. Park MJ, Yun SJ, Yun HM, Chang H, Han SH, An J, Son Y (2016) Effects of open-field artificial warming and precipitation manipulation on physiological characteristics and growth of Pinus densiflora seedlings. J Clim Change Res 7:9–17 (In Korean with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seo DJ (2012) A study on phenology and growth of Pinus densiflora forest in the Baekdudaegan area. Doctoral dissertation, GyeongSang National University. (In Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  36. Seo Y, Lee D, Choi J (2017) Growth pattern analysis of major coniferous tree species in South Korea. For Sci Tech 14:1–6Google Scholar
  37. Sherry RA, Zhou X, Gu S, Arnone JA, Schimel DS, Verburg PS, Wallace LL, Luo Y (2007) Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:198–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Slaney M, Wallin G, Medhurst J, Linder S (2007) Impact of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on bud burst and shoot growth of boreal norway spruce. Tree Physiol 27:301–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams RJ, Myers BA, Muller WJ, Duff GA, Eamus D (1997) Leaf phenology of woody species in a north Australian tropical savanna. Ecology 78:2542–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolkovich EM, Cook BI, Allen JM, Crimmins TM, Betancourt JL, Travers SE, Pau S, Regetz J, Davies TJ, Kraft NJB, Ault TR, Bolmgren K, Mazer SJ, McCabe GJ, McGill BJ, Parmesan C, Salamin N, Schwartz MD, Cleland EE (2012) Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485:494–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yun SJ, Han S, Han SH, Lee SJ, Jung Y, Kim S, Son Y (2014) Open-field experimental warming and precipitation manipulation system design to simulate climate change impact. J Korean For Soc 103:159–164 (In Korean with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou L, Tucker CJ, Kaufmann RK, Slayback D, Shabanov NV, Myneni RB (2001) Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999. J Geophys Res Atmos 106:20069–20083CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna Chang
    • 1
  • Seung Hyun Han
    • 1
  • Jiae An
    • 1
  • Min Ji Park
    • 1
  • Yowhan Son
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Graduate SchoolKorea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations