Although the safety and feasibility of conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for appendiceal mucocele (AM) has been reported, studies on single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for AM have not been reported. Here, we aimed to compare the perioperative and short-term outcomes between SILS and CLS for AM and to evaluate the oncological safety of SILS.
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients, diagnosed based on computed tomography findings, who underwent laparoscopic surgery for AM between 2010 and 2018 at one institution. We excluded patients strongly suspected of having malignant lesions and those with preoperative appendiceal perforation. Patients were divided into two groups—CLS and SILS. Pathological outcomes and long-term results were investigated. The median follow-up period was 43.7 (range: 12.3–118.5) months.
Ultimately, 116 patients (CLS = 68, SILS = 48) were enrolled. Patient demographic characteristics did not differ between the groups. The preoperative mucocele diameter was greater in the CLS than in the SILS group (3.2 ± 2.9 cm vs. 2.3 ± 1.4 cm, P = 0.029). More extensive surgery (right hemicolectomies and ileocecectomies) was performed in the CLS than in the SILS group (P = 0.014). Intraoperative perforation developed in only one patient per group. For appendectomies and cecectomies, the CLS group exhibited a longer operation time than the SILS group (63.3 ± 24.5 min vs. 52.4 ± 17.3 min, P = 0.014); the same was noted for length of postoperative hospital stay (2.9 ± 1.8 days vs. 1.7 ± 0.6 days, P < 0.001). The most common AM etiology was low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (71/116 [61.2%] patients); none of the patients exhibited mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Among these 71 patients, there were 8 patients with microscopic appendiceal perforation or positive resection margins. No recurrence was detected.
SILS for AM is feasible and safe perioperatively and in the short-term and yields favorable oncological outcomes. Despite the retrospective nature of the study, SILS may be suitable after careful selection of AM patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Wang H, Chen YQ, Wei R, Wang QB, Song B, Wang CY, Zhang B (2013) Appendiceal mucocele: a diagnostic dilemma in differentiating malignant from benign lesions with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(4):W590–595
Landen S, Bertrand C, Maddern GJ, Herman D, Pourbaix A, de Neve A, Schmitz A (1992) Appendiceal mucoceles and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175(5):401–404
Dhage-Ivatury S, Sugarbaker PH (2006) Update on the surgical approach to mucocele of the appendix. J Am Coll Surg 202(4):680–684
Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41(8):745–749
Marotta B, Chaudhry S, McNaught A, Quereshy F, Vajpeyi R, Chetty R, Ghai S (2019) Predicting Underlying Neoplasms in Appendiceal Mucoceles at CT: Focal Versus Diffuse Luminal Dilatation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 213(2):343–348
Stocchi L, Wolff BG, Larson DR, Harrington JR (2003) Surgical treatment of appendiceal mucocele. Arch Surg 138(6):585–589; discussion 589–590
Szych C, Staebler A, Connolly DC, Wu R, Cho KR, Ronnett BM (1999) Molecular genetic evidence supporting the clonality and appendiceal origin of Pseudomyxoma peritonei in women. Am J Pathol 154(6):1849–1855
Misdraji J (2010) Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: controversial issues. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134(6):864–870
Panarelli NC, Yantiss RK (2011) Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix and peritoneum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135(10):1261–1268
Morano WF, Gleeson EM, Sullivan SH, Padmanaban V, Mapow BL, Shewokis PA, Esquivel J, Bowne WB (2018) Clinicopathological features and management of appendiceal mucoceles: a systematic review. Am Surg 84(2):273–281
Kim TK, Park JH, Kim JY, Kim BC, Kang BM, Min SK, Kim JW (2018) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucocele: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 32(11):4408–4414
González Moreno S, Shmookler BM, Sugarbaker PH (1998) Appendiceal mucocele. Contraindication to laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 12(9):1177–1179
Sturniolo G, Barbuscia M, Taranto F, Tonante A, Paparo D, Romeo G, Nucera D, Lentini M (2011) Mucocele of the appendix. Two case reports. G Chir 32(11–12):487–490
Park KJ, Choi HJ, Kim SH (2015) Laparoscopic approach to mucocele of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma: feasibility and short-term outcomes in 24 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 29(11):3179–3183
Navarra G, Asopa V, Basaglia E, Jones M, Jiao LR, Habib NA (2003) Mucous cystadenoma of the appendix: is it safe to remove it by a laparoscopic approach? Surg Endosc 17(5):833–834
Lau H, Yuen WK, Loong F, Lee F (2002) Laparoscopic resection of an appendiceal mucocele. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(5):367–370
Ju YT, Park ST, Ha WS, Hong SC, Lee YJ, Jung EJ, Jung CY, Jeong SH, Choi SK (2011) Laparoscopic resection of a appendiceal mucocele. J Korean Surg Soc 80(Suppl 1):S21–S25
Behranwala KA, Agarwal T, El-Sharkawi D, Shorvon D, Chang A (2006) Laparoscopic resection of mucinous cystadenoma of appendix: a careful decision. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):347–348
Kaya C, Yazici P, Omeroglu S, Mihmanli M (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy for appendiceal mucocele in an 83 years old woman. World J Gastrointest Surg 5(6):207–209
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ, Senthilkumar K, Annapoorni S (2008) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for mucocele due to a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. JSLS 12(2):194–197
Yoshida Y, Sato K, Tada T, Maekawa H, Sakurada M, Orita H, Ito T, Hirata F, Wada R (2013) Two cases of mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix successfully treated by laparoscopy. Case Rep Gastroenterol 7(1):44–48
Cho MS, Min BS, Hong YK, Lee WJ (2011) Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes. Surg Endosc 25(1):36–40
Park KB, Park JS, Choi GS, Kim HJ, Park SY, Ryuk JP, Choi WH, Jang YS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucoceles: safety and feasibility in a series of 16 consecutive cases. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27(6):287–292
Fujino S, Miyoshi N, Noura S, Shingai T, Tomita Y, Ohue M, Yano M (2014) Single-incision laparoscopic cecectomy for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm after laparoscopic rectectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 6(5):84–87
Vatansev C, Simsek G, Kucukkartallar T (2013) Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy with two port: a case of appendiceal mucocele. Indian J Surg 75(Suppl 1):382–384
Misdraji J, Young RH (2004) Primary epithelial neoplasms and other epithelial lesions of the appendix (excluding carcinoid tumors). Semin Diagn Pathol 21(2):120–133
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(10):1013–1016
Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10(8):823–826
Maggiori L, Gaujoux S, Tribillon E, Bretagnol F, Panis Y (2012) Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures. Colorectal Dis 14(10):e643–e654
Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Poon MC, Wong SK, Leong HT, Lai PB, Ng EK (2012) A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic single-site access versus conventional 3-port appendectomy. Ann Surg 256(6):909–914
Carter JT, Kaplan JA, Nguyen JN, Lin MY, Rogers SJ, Harris HW (2014) A prospective, rnadomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218(5):950–909
Lee W, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee T (2013) Singe-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 257(2):214–218
Hesketh KT (1963) The management of primary adenocarcinoma of the vermiform appendix. Gut 4(2):158–168
González-Moreno S, Sugarbaker PH (2004) Right hemicolectomy does not confer a survival advantage in patients with mucinous carcinoma of the appendix and peritoneal seeding. Br J Surg 91(3):304–311
Sugarbaker PH (2009) Epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. Cancer J 15(3):225–235
Misdraji J (2015) Mucinous epithelial neoplasms of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol 28(Suppl 1):S67–S79
Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
Tiselius C, Kindler C, Shetye J, Letocha H, Smedh K (2017) Computed tomography follow-up assessment of patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: evaluation of risk for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Ann Surg Oncol 24(7):1778–1782
Ho Seung Kim, Han-Gil Kim, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim, and Min Soo Cho have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H.S., Kim, HG., Yang, S.Y. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucocele: a series of 116 patients. Surg Endosc (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08263-3
- Laparoscopic surgery
- Single incision
- Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm