The surgical difficulty and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are related to the size of the cut liver surface. This study assessed whether the estimated parenchymal transection surface area could predict intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes.
LLRs performed between 2008 and 2018, for whom a preoperative CT scan was available for 3D review, were included in the study. The area of scheduled parenchymal transection was measured on the preoperative CT scan and cut-off values that could predict intraoperative difficulty were analyzed.
152 patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy (n = 27, median estimated area 30.1 cm2 [range 16.6–65.9]), left/right hepatectomy (n = 17 and n = 70, 76.8 cm2 [range 43.9–150.9] and 72.2 cm2 [range 39.4–124.9], respectively), right posterior sectionectomy (n = 7, 113.3 cm2 [range 102.1–136.3]), central hepatectomy (n = 11, 109.1 cm2 [range 66.1–186.1]) and extended left/right hepatectomy (n = 6 and n = 14, 115.3 cm2 [range 92.9–128.9] and 50.7 cm2 [range 13.3–74.9], respectively) were included. An estimated parenchymal transection surface area ≥ 100 cm2 was associated with significant increase in operative time (AUC 0.81, 95% CI [0.70, 0.93], p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (AUC 0.92, 95% CI [0.86, 0.97], p < 0.001), as well as a higher conversion rate (22.2% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001). Overall (p = 0.017) and major morbidity (p = 0.003), biliary leakage (p < 0.001) and pulmonary complications (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with an estimated parenchymal transection surface area ≥ 100 cm2.
An estimated parenchymal transection surface area ≥ 100 cm2 is a relevant indicator of surgical difficulty and postoperative complications in LLR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332
Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9,000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777
Fuks D, Cauchy F, Fteriche S, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Fusco G, Belghiti J, Gayet B, Soubrane O (2016) Laparoscopy decreases pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major liver resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 263:353–361
Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GMV, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tønnessen TI, Abildgaard BL, Yaqub S, Røsok BI, Bjørnbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B (2018) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:199–207
Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Sasaki A et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a comparative analysis of 168 consecutive cases at a single center. Surgery 157:1065–1072
Qiu J, Chen S, Pankaj P, Wu H (2014) Laparoscopic hepatectomy is associated with considerably less morbidity and a long-term survival similar to that of the open procedure in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:517–522
Tohme S, Goswami J, Han K, Chidi AP, Geller DA, Reddy S, Gleisner A, Tsung A (2015) Minimally invasive resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases leads to an earlier initiation of chemotherapy compared to open surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 19:2199–2206
Guilbaud T, Birnbaum DJ, Berdah S, Farges O, Beyert Berjot L (2019) Learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection, educational value of simulation and training programs: a systematic review. World J Surg 43:2710–2719
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS, World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery. Ann Surg 250:825–830
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, VanDam RM, Scatton O, AbuHilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schön MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629
Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2014) Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification. World J Surg 38:3169–3174
Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J, Gayet B, D'Hondt M, Lesurtel M, Menon K, Lodge P, Rotellar F, Santoyo J, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Sutcliffe R, Van Dam R, White S, Halls MC, Cipriani F, Van der Poel M, Ciria R, Barkhatov L, Gomez-Luque Y, Ocana-Garcia S, Cook A, Buell J, Clavien PA, Dervenis C, Fusai G, Geller D, Lang H, Primrose J, Taylor M, Van Gulik T, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Cherqui D (2018) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery. Ann Surg 268:11–18
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753
Halls MC, Cherqui D, Taylor MA, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M, Collaborators of The Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Survey (2018) Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future. HPB (Oxford) 20:231–236
Hasegawa Y, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Takahara T, Katagiri H, Umemura A, Makabe K, Sasaki A (2017) A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty. Surg Endosc 31:5356–5363
Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan. J Am Coll Surg 225:249–258
Halls MC, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Barkhatov L, Lainas P, Harris S, D'Hondt M, Rotellar F, Dagher I, Aldrighetti L, Troisi RI, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M (2018) Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 105:1182–1191
Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17
Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H, Nagahori K, Shimada H (2003) Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg 27:695–698
Clavien PA, Barkun J, DeOliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196
Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Ogata S, Sauvanet A, Delefosse D, Durand F (2005) The ’’50-50 criteria’’ on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–829
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841
Guillaud A, Pery C, Campillo B, Lourdais A, Sulpice L, Boudjema K (2013) Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections. HPB (Oxford) 15:224–229
Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Pomfret EA, Keogan MT, Warmbrand G, Raptopoulos V (2001) Impact of multidetector CT on Donor selection and surgical planning before living adult right lobe liver transplantation. Am J Roentgenol 176:193–200
Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, Shindoh J, Miki K, Akamatsu N, Arita J, Kaneko J, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N (2018) How has virtual hepatectomy changed the practice of liver surgery? : experience of 1194 virtual hepatectomy before liver resection and living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 268:127–133
Hallet J, Gayet B, Tsung A, Wakabayashi G, Pessaux P, 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection Group (2015) Systematic review of the use of preoperative simulation and navigation for hepatectomy: current status and future perspectives. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci 22:353–362
Nakayama K, Oshiro Y, Miyamoto R, Kohno K, Fukunaga K, Ohkohchi N (2017) The effect of three-dimensional preoperative simulation on liver surgery. World J Surg 41:1840–1847
Soubrane O, Schwarz L, Cauchy F, Perotto LO, Brustia R, Bernard D, Scatton O (2015) A conceptual technique for laparoscopic right hepatectomy based on facts and oncologic principles: the caudal approach. Ann Surg 261:1226–1231
Zimmitti G, Roses RE, Andreou A, Shindoh J, Curley SA, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN (2013) Greater complexity of liver surgery is not associated with an increased incidence of liver-related complications except for bile leak: an experience with 2628 consecutive resections. J Gastrointest Surg 17:57–64
Taguchi Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Kokuryo T, Wakai K, Nagino M (2014) The determination of bile leakage in complex hepatectomy based on the guidelines of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. World J Surg 38:168–176
Dokmak S, Agostini J, Jacquin A, Cauchy F, Farges O, Belghiti J (2012) High risk of biliary fistula after isolated segment VIII liver resection. World J Surg 36:2692–2698
Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Belgaumkar A, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Gayet B (2016) Incidence, risk factors and consequences of bile leakage following laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 30:3709–3719
Mohkam K, Fuks D, Vibert E, Nomi T, Cauchy F, Kawaguchi Y, Boleslawski E, Regimbeau JM, Gayet B, Mabrut JY (2018) external validation and optimization of the french association of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery and transplantation’s score to predict severe postoperative biliary leakage after open or laparoscopic liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 226:1137–1146
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Drs Théophile Guilbaud, Ugo Scemama, Anthony Sarran, Ecoline Tribillon, Alexandra Nassar, Brice Gayet and David Fuks, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Guilbaud, T., Scemama, U., Sarran, A. et al. Predictive ability of preoperative CT scan for the intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07734-x
- Operative time