Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of fluorescence angiography on anastomotic leak rate following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak (AL) is the most feared complication in colorectal surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography allows for real-time intraoperative evaluation of bowel perfusion. This study aimed to assess the impact of ICG on perioperative outcomes in patients treated with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer.

Methods

Comparative study based on a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, to validate the use of ICG assessment (ICGA) during TaTME (November/2011–June/2018). The primary outcome was the clinical AL rate. The secondary outcomes included modification of proximal colonic transection, anastomotic redo, additional surgical maneuvers and surgical morbidity.

Results

Two hundred and eighty-four patients were included, 204 (71.8%) in non-ICG group and 80 (28.2%) in ICG group. No significant differences were found in patient and tumor features. Mean anastomotic height was 4.85 cm vs. 5.04 cm (p = 0.500), diverting stoma was constructed in 205 patients (72.1% vs. 72.5%; p = 0.941). Fluorescence angiography modified the surgical plan in 23 patients (28.7%). AL was diagnosed in 23 patients (11.3%) in the non-ICG group and in two patients (2.5%) in the ICG group (p = 0.020). Postoperative intraabdominal collection was diagnosed in 19 patients (7.4% vs. 5.1%; p = 0.490), and reintervention was needed in 24 patients (10.8% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.420). Median length of hospital stay was 6.0 (IQR 5.0–9) vs. 4.0 (IQR 3.0–8.5) (p = 0.005). ICGA was found as independent protective factor for AL in the multivariate analysis of the whole cohort (n = 284) (OR 0.142; 95% CI 0.032–0.633; p = 0.010).

Conclusion

ICG fluorescence angiography modified the proximal colonic transection in more than one-quarter of patients, leading to a significant decrease of AL rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberts JCJ, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ (2003) Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorectal Dis 5(5):478–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46(5):653–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jorgensen P (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86(7):927–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R, Stein HD (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 184(4):364–372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park JS, Choi G-S, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision. Ann Surg 257(4):665–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Margolin DA, Sherwinter DA, Lee SW, Senagore AJ, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(1):82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Senagore A, Lane FR, Lee E, Wexner S, Dujovny N, Sklow B, Rider P, Bonello J, Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement Study Group (2014) Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in restorative proctectomy and anterior resection: a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Höer JJ (2010) Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395(8):1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28(10):2988–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A (2016) Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 30(7):2736–2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. James DRC, Ris F, Yeung TM, Kraus R, Buchs NC, Mortensen NJ, Hompes RJ (2015) Fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses with pinpoint perfusion imaging a critical appraisal with specific focus on leak risk reduction. Colorectal Dis 3:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koh FH, Tan K-K (2016) Fluorescent angiography used to evaluate the perfusion status of anastomosis in laparoscopic anterior resection. Ann Surg Oncol 23(5):692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Van Overstraeten ADB, D’Hoore A (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision: Towards standardization of technique. World J Gastroenterol 21(44):12686–12695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma B, Gao P, Song Y, Zhang C, Zhang C, Wang L, Liu H, Wang Z (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Cancer 16(1):380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis pp. (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18(1):19–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J et al (2017) Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. Ann Surg 266(1):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP (2019) International TaTMERegistry Collaborative incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg. 269(4):700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deijen CL, Tsai A, Koedam TWA, Veltcamp Helbach M, Sietses C, Lacy AM, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB (2016) Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 20(12):811–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arroyave MC, DeLacy FB, Lacy AM (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: step by step description of the surgical technique for a two-teams approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(2):502–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147(3):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. British J Surgery 102(5):462–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 365(9472):1718–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sauer R, Fietkau R, Wittekind C, Rödel C, Martus P, Hohenberger W, Tschmelitsch J, Sabitzer H, Karstens JH, Becker H, Hess C, Raab R, German Rectal Cancer Group (2003) Adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the German trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Colorectal Dis. 5(5):406–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ, Mills SD, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(8):3003–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I, Horstmann O, Brinker J, Becker H (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92(1):101–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(5):569–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim JC, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Alotaibi AM, Kim J (2016) Utility of indocyanine-green fluorescent imaging during robot-assisted sphincter-saving surgery on rectal cancer patients. Int J Med Robot 12(4):710–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, Welton M (2015) Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum 58(6):582–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Wada T, Takahashi R, Hisamori S, Hida K, Sakai Y (2017) Evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic colorectal surgery with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 31(3):1061–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mizrahi I, Abu-Gazala M, Rickles AS, Fernandez LM, Petrucci A, Wolf J, Sands DR, Wexner SD (2018) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: results of a comparative cohort study. Tech Coloproctol 22(7):535–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fernández-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblan D, Del Gobbo GD, DeLacy B, Balust J, Lacy AM (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261(2):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milsom JW (2013) Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection. Ann Surg 257(1):108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyers MA (1976) Griffiths’ point: critical anastomosis at the splenic flexure. Significance in ischemia of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126(1):77–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M, Watanabe K, Watanabe J, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2018) Randomized clinical trial of high versus low inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2(4):195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mari GM, Crippa J, Cocozza E, Berselli M, Livraghi L, Carzaniga P, Valenti F, Roscio F, Ferrari G, Mazzola M, Magistro C, Origi M, Forgione A, Zuliani W, Scandroglio I, Pugliese R, Costanzi ATM, Maggioni D (2018) Low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer reduces genitourinary dysfunction: results from a randomized controlled trial (HIGHLOW Trial). Ann Surg. 296:1018–1024

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, Bracale U (2018) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 24(21):2247–2260. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2247

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, AIS Channel, Barcelona, Spain

    A. M. Otero-Piñeiro, F. B. de Lacy, B. Martín-Perez, S. Valverde, R. Bravo & A. M. Lacy

  2. Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, ‘s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

    J. J. Van Laarhoven

Authors
  1. A. M. Otero-Piñeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. B. de Lacy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. J. Van Laarhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Martín-Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Valverde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Bravo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. M. Lacy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Lacy.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Antonio M. Lacy is a consultant for Medtronic, Conmed Corporation, Olympus Medical, Touchstone International Medical Science Co. Ltd., Applied Medical, and Johnson & Johnson. Drs. Otero-Piñeiro AM, de Lacy FB, Van Laarhoven JJ, Martín-Perez B, Valverde S, Bravo R has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otero-Piñeiro, A.M., de Lacy, F.B., Van Laarhoven, J.J. et al. The impact of fluorescence angiography on anastomotic leak rate following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 35, 754–762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07442-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07442-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation