Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic repair is superior to open techniques when treating primary groin hernias in women: a nationwide register-based cohort study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Few studies have described recurrence rates after groin hernia repair in women. Our aim was to investigate if laparoscopic repair of primary groin hernias in women results in a lower reoperation rate for recurrence compared with open repairs. Furthermore, we wished to compare hernia subtypes at primary repair and reoperation.

Methods

This nationwide cohort study was reported according to the RECORD statement. We used prospectively collected data from the Danish Hernia Database to generate a cohort of females operated for a primary groin hernia from 1998 to 2017. Our primary outcome was reoperation for recurrence. The secondary outcome was subtype of hernia at primary repair and reoperation. All females had at least 6-month follow-up.

Results

We included 13,945 primary groin hernia operations in women, of whom 649 had undergone a reoperation for recurrence. Median follow-up time was 8.8 years. The cumulative reoperation rates were lower after laparoscopic repair compared with the open techniques, for both inguinal hernias (1.8 vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and femoral hernias (2.2 vs. 5.5%, p = 0.005). After laparoscopic repair, 25% of inguinal hernias recurred as femoral, compared with 47% after Lichtenstein (p < 0.001). Direct inguinal hernias and femoral hernias had higher risk of reoperation for recurrence after open repair compared with indirect inguinal hernias. For laparoscopic procedures, hernia subtypes at the primary groin hernia repair had similar reoperation rates.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic repair of primary groin hernia in women had lower reoperation rates and fewer femoral recurrences than open repair techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burcharth J, Pedersen M, Bisgaard T, Pedersen C, Rosenberg J (2013) Nationwide prevalence of groin hernia repair. PLoS ONE 8:e54367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber A, Valencia S, Garteiz D, Burguess A (2001) Epidemology of hernias in the female. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui ME, Flament JB, Phillips EH (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer, New York, pp 613–619

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamaki M, Nilsson E, Nordin P (2007) Mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 245:656–660

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kingsnorth A (2004) Treating inguinal hernias. BMJ 328:59–60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Andresen K, Rosenberg J (2017) Open preperitoneal groin hernia repair with mesh: a qualitative systematic review. Am J Surg 213:1153–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:161–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burcharth J, Andresen K, Pommergaard HC, Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J (2014) Direct inguinal hernias and anterior surgical approach are risk factors for female inguinal hernia recurrences. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:71–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koch A, Edwards A, Haapaniemi S, Nordin P, Kald A (2005) Prospective evaluation of 6895 groin hernia repairs in women. Br J Surg 92:1553–1558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson H, Holmberg H, Nordin P (2017) Groin hernia repair in women: a nationwide register study. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2006) Inguinal herniorrhaphy in women. Hernia 10:30–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jess P, Hauge C, Hansen CR (1999) Long-term results of repair of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia. Eur J Surg 165:748–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schouten N, Burgmans JP, van Dalen T, Smakman N, Clevers GJ, Davids PH, Verleisdonk EJ, Elias SG, Simmermacher RK (2012) Female ‘groin’ hernia: totally extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair seems the most appropriate treatment modality. Hernia 16:387–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, Sorensen HT, von Elm E, Langan SM (2015) The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 12:e1001885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Friis-Andersen H, Bisgaard T (2016) The Danish Inguinal Hernia database. Clin Epidemiol 8:521–524

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen CB, Gotzsche H, Moller JO, Mortensen PB (2006) The Danish Civil Registration System: a cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med Bull 53:441–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. The HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kocijan R, Sandberg S, Chan YW, Hollinsky C (2010) Anatomical changes after inguinal hernia treatment: a reason for chronic pain and recurrent hernia? Surg Endosc 24:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Putnis S, Wong A, Berney C (2011) Synchronous femoral hernias diagnosed during endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25:3752–3754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Henriksen NA, Thorup J, Jorgensen LN (2012) Unsuspected femoral hernia in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of recurrent inguinal hernia. Hernia 16:381–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mikkelsen T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2002) Risk of femoral hernia after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 89:486–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Bisgaard T, Rosenberg J (2015) Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Surg Innov 22:303–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nolsoe A, Andresen K, Rosenberg J (2016) Repair of recurrent hernia is often performed at a different clinic. Hernia 20:783–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 249:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Feliu-Pala X, Martin-Gomez M, Morales-Conde S, Fernandez-Sallent E (2001) The impact of the surgeon’s experience on the results of laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 15:1467–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kald A, Nilsson E, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Engstrom P, Gunnarsson U, Haapaniemi S, Lindhagen J, Nilsson P, Sandblom G, Stubberod (1998) A reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery: a three year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies. Eur J Surg 164:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no financial support from extramural sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Line Schmidt, Stina Öberg, Kristoffer Andresen & Jacob Rosenberg

Authors
  1. Line Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stina Öberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristoffer Andresen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacob Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Line Schmidt.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Mr. Andresen reports personal fees from C.R. Bard, Inc. outside the submitted work. Mr. Rosenberg reports personal fees from C.R. Bard, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc. outside the submitted work. Ms. Schmidt and Ms. Öberg have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, L., Öberg, S., Andresen, K. et al. Laparoscopic repair is superior to open techniques when treating primary groin hernias in women: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Surg Endosc 33, 71–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6270-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6270-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation