Skip to main content
Log in

Learning curve for performing choledochotomy bile duct exploration with primary closure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Primary closure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a safe and effective approach for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of performing primary closure after LC+LCBDE.

Methods

We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent primary closure after LC+LCBDE performed by a single surgeon from January 2009 to April 2015 in our institution, and analyzed preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to evaluate the learning curve for this procedure.

Results

Overall, there were 390 patients. The total postoperative complications rate was 7.2%, including bile leakage in 9 (2.3%) patients and retained common bile duct stone in 3 (0.8%) patients. The CUSUM operating time (OT) learning curve was best modeled by the equation: CUSUMOT = 312.209 × procedure0.599 × e(−0.011×procedure) + 122.608 (R2 = 0.96). The learning curve was composed of two phases, phase 1 (the initial 54 patients) and phase 2 (the remaining 336 patients). A significant decrease in the OT (116.8 ± 22.4 vs. 93.8 ± 17.8 min; p < 0.001) and complication rate (16.7 vs. 5.7%; p < 0.01) including the rate of bile leakage (7.4 vs. 1.5%; p < 0.01) and retained stone (3.7 vs. 0.3%; p < 0.01) was observed between the two phases. In addition, 20 patients had conversion to open surgery. Impacted stones were independently associated with conversion, as indicated by a multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

The data suggest that the learning curve of this procedure was achieved in approximately 54 cases. An impacted stone was the only risk factor that affected the conversion rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.121657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K (2000) Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies. Am Surg 66:262–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frossard JL, Morel PM (2010) Detection and management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 72:808–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baillie J, Testoni PA (2016) Same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP for choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 84:646–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wandling MW, Hungness ES, Pavey ES, Stulberg JJ, Schwab B, Yang AD, Shapiro MB, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Nathens AB (2016) Nationwide assessment of trends in choledocholithiasis management in the United States from 1998 to 2013. JAMA Surg 151:1125–1130. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Quaresima S, Balla A, Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E, Paganini AM (2017) A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. HPB 19(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mattila A, Luhtala J, Mrena J, Kautiainen H, Kellokumpu I (2014) An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland. Surg Endosc 28:3451–3457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3620-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Geidie AA (2010) Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 14:844–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1133-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, Li JM, Dong ZT, Mo XD (2009) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 157:e1–e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu X, Yang Y, Dong P, Gu J, Lu J, Li M, Mu J, Wu W, Yang J, Zhang L, Ding Q, Liu Y (2012) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 397:909–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0962-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu QD, Tao CL, Zhou MT, Yu ZP, Shi HQ, Zhang QY (2011) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 396:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0660-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Estellés VN, Domingo DPC, Peris TN, Díez AJÁ, Vázquez TA, Blanes MF (2016) Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30:1975–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4424-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keeling NJ, Menzies D, Motson RW (1999) Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 13(2):109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C, Kalia A, Ammori BJ (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27:4164–4170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3015-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hua J, Lin S, Qian D, He Z, Zhang T, Song Z (2015) Primary closure and rate of bile leak following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy. Dig Surg 32:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan DS, Jain PA, Khalifa A, Hughes R, Baker AL (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 101(11):1448–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JS, Yoon YC (2016) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration using V-Loc suture with insertion of endobiliary stent. Surg Endosc 30(6):2530–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4518-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, Guillon F, Rodier JG, Fingerhut A (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9012-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tai CK, Tang CN, Ha JP, Chau CH, Siu WT, Li MK (2004) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18:910–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park JS, Jeong S, Han JY, Lee DH (2014) Endoscopic balloon dilation lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. Dig Dis Sci 59:1898–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3154-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uskudar O, Parlak E, Disibeyaz S, Koksal AS, Cicek B, Kilic ZM, Odemis B, Sasmaz N (2013) Major predictors for difficult common bile duct stone. Turk J Gastroenterol 24:423–429. https://doi.org/10.4318/tjg.2013.0511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gigot JF, Navez B, Etienne J, Cambier E, Jadoul P, Guiot P, Kestens PJ (1997) A stratified intraoperative surgical strategy is mandatory during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stones. Lessons and limits from an initial experience of 92 patients. Surg Endosc 11:722–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lei J, Wang J, Li Q, Wu P, Yuan R, Zhu H, Zou S, Shao J, Fang L (2016) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: T-shaped incision of cystic duct with FREDDY laser lithotripsy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:646–651. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81760435), the Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (20161BBI90016), and the Advantage Innovation Team of Jiangxi Province (20153BCB24004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Lei or Jianghua Shao.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Hengqing Zhu, Linquan Wu, Rongfa Yuan, Yu Wang, Wenjun Liao, Jun Lei, and Jianghua Shao have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Hengqing Zhu and Linquan Wu have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Wu, L., Yuan, R. et al. Learning curve for performing choledochotomy bile duct exploration with primary closure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 32, 4263–4270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6175-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6175-3

Keywords

Navigation