Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between endoscopic and surgical resection for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) managed with either endoscopic resection (ER) or surgery.

Methods

The inclusion criteria were AEG, meeting classic or expanded indications for ER of early gastric cancer, and complete resection. A total of 66 patients with Siewert type II AEG were included (ER group, n = 38; vs. surgery group, n = 28).

Results

The mean age of the ER group was greater than that of the surgery group (mean ± SD, 66.9 ± 9.7 vs. 58.5 ± 10.4 years, respectively; p = 0.001). Compared to the ER group, macroscopically flat or depressed-type lesions were more common (47.4 vs. 89.3%; p = 0.001), and mean lesion size was larger in the surgery group (13.3 ± 8.4 vs. 18.6 ± 11.0 mm; p = 0.039). One intensive care unit admission and subsequent surgery-related death occurred in the surgery group (1/28 vs. 0/38 in the ER group; p = 0.424). During follow-up, recurrence was detected in both groups (4/38 vs. 1/28; p = 0.385). Overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival did not differ between the groups (93.3 vs. 92.9%; p  = 0.282 and 88.0 vs. 100.0%; p = 0.066).

Conclusions

Once complete resection is achieved in patients with AEG who met the expanded criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between ER and surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chung JW, Lee GH, Choi KS, Kim DH, Jung KW, Song HJ, Choi KD, Jung HY, Kim JH, Yook JH, Kim BS, Jang SJ (2009) Unchanging trend of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in Korea: experience at a single institution based on Siewert’s classification. Dis Esophagus 22(8):676–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00946.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Network Ncc Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers (version 3.2015), page MS-5. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/esophageal.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2015

  3. Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Naehrig J, Sarbia M, Siewert JR (2005) Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection. Ann Surg 242(4):566–573 discussion 573–565

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FG, ten Kate FJ, Visser M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Weusten BL, Bergman JJ (2010) Risk of lymph node metastasis associated with deeper invasion by early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: study based on endoscopic resection specimens. Endoscopy 42(12):1030–1036. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85(11):1457–1459. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00940.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gotoda T, Iwasaki M, Kusano C, Seewald S, Oda I (2010) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer treated by guideline and expanded National Cancer Centre criteria. Br J Surg 97(6):868–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010. Gastric Cancer ver. 3(2):113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4 14 ) .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. An JY, Heo GU, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2010) Assessment of open versus laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in lymph node-positive early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Surg Oncol 102(1):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Gronnier C, Triboulet JP (2011) Oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: which therapeutic approach? Lancet Oncol 12(3):296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70125-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park CH, Kim EH, Kim HY, Roh YH, Lee YC (2015) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stage esophagogastric junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 47(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2014.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada M, Oda I, Nonaka S, Suzuki H, Yoshinaga S, Taniguchi H, Sekine S, Kushima R, Saito Y, Gotoda T (2013) Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection of superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Endoscopy 45(12):992–996. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Omae M, Fujisaki J, Horiuchi Y, Yoshizawa N, Matsuo Y, Kubota M, Suganuma T, Okada K, Ishiyama A, Hirasawa T, Yamamoto Y, Tsuchida T, Hoshino E, Igarashi M (2013) Safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophagogastric junction cancer. Gastr Cancer 16(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0162-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirasawa K, Kokawa A, Oka H, Yahara S, Sasaki T, Nozawa A, Tanaka K (2010) Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 72(5):960–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karanicolas PJ, Graham D, Gonen M, Strong VE, Brennan MF, Coit DG (2013) Quality of life after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg 257(6):1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c4a19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nai C, Liu Z, Lian X, Liu S, Guo M, Xiao S, Liu J, Yang X, Zhang H (2016) [Survival rate of proximal and total gastrectomy in treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (Siewert II (Types)]. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese. J Gastrointest Surg 19(2):195–199

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jung do H, Ahn SH, Park do J, Kim HH (2015) Proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastr Cancer 15(2):77–86. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.2.77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a faculty research Grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 6-2008-0100.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyunsoo Chung or Sung Kwan Shin.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Hyun Ju Kim, Hyunsoo Chung, Hyoung-Il Kim, Jun Chul Park, Sung Kwan Shin, Sang Kil Lee, Woo Jin Hyung, Sung Hoon Noh, and Yong Chan Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.J., Chung, H., Shin, S.K. et al. Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between endoscopic and surgical resection for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc 32, 3540–3547 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6076-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6076-5

Keywords

Navigation