Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm: efficacy and safety study to guide future practice
Background and study aims
ESTD and ESD are currently the two primary treatment options for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm (SESCN) in China. However, in larger cases, ESD proves to be technically challenging and time saving, whereas ESTD exhibits promising efficacy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two techniques for large SESCN.
Patients and methods
A total of 150 patients with solitary large SESCN that underwent either ESTD (n = 52) or ESD (n = 98) between August 2011 and June 2016 were included in this study. Both efficacy and safety clinical data were collected and analyzed.
All of the 150 patients were found to successfully undergo ESTD or ESD with 92.68 ± 67.96 (mean ± SD) min. The specimen area was measured to be 13.79 ± 7.44 (mean ± SD) cm2 and the dissection speed was 17.99 ± 10.40 (mean ± SD) mm2/min. En bloc resection and R0 resection were achieved in 91.33% (137/150) and 86.00% (129/150) of the cases, respectively. A total of 8.67% (13/150) were found to have intra-operative adverse events. Based on statistical analysis, ESTD was found to have a higher dissection speed and a similar adverse event rate compared with ESD. Moreover, a long operation time was found to be an independent risk factor for intra-operative adverse events.
ESTD and ESD both were found to be effective and safe treatment options for the treatment of large SESCN. ESTD appeared to improve operation efficacy, which was reflected in a higher dissection speed compared with ESD. We also demonstrate that long operation times should be avoided as much as possible in order to reduce intra-operative adverse events.
KeywordsEndoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection Endoscopic submucosal dissection Superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm
The present study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1303601).
Compliance with ethical standards
Drs. Wengang Zhang, Yaqi Zhai, Ningli Chai, Enqiang Linghu, Zhongsheng Lu, Huikai Li, and Xiuxue Feng have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 6.Zhang YM, Boerwinkel DF, He S, Weusten BL, Xue LY, Fleischer DE, Lu N, Dawsey SM, Zuo SM, Qin XM, Dou LZ, Bergman JJ, Wang GQ (2013) Prospective feasibility study on the use of multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of early squamous neoplasia in the esophagus. Endoscopy 45:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Zhang YM, Boerwinkel DF, Qin X, He S, Xue L, Weusten BL, Dawsey SM, Fleischer DE, Dou LZ, Liu Y, Lu N, Bergman JJ, Wang GQ (2016) A randomized trial comparing multiband mucosectomy and cap-assisted endoscopic resection for endoscopic piecemeal resection of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus. Endoscopy 48:330–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A, Pagano N, Zullo A, Rando G, Strangio G, Romeo F, Nicita R, Rosati R, Malesci A (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective Western series. Gastrointest Endosc 71:715–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fernandez-Esparrach G, Calderon A, de la Pena J, Diaz Tasende JB, Esteban JM, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Herreros de Tejada A, Martinez-Ares D, Nicolas-Perez D, Nogales O, Ono A, Orive-Calzada A, Parra-Blanco A, Rodriguez Munoz S, Sanchez Hernandez E, Sanchez-Yague A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Vila J, Lopez Roses L (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 46:361–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zhai Y, Linghu E, Li H (2014) Double-tunnel endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms. Endoscopy 46 Suppl 1 UCTN:E204–E205Google Scholar
- 20.Park HC, Kim DH, Gong EJ, Na HK, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Jung KW, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY, Kim JH (2016) Ten-year experience of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms in a single center. Korean J Intern Med 31:1064–1072CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H, Okahara S, Tanuma T, Kodaira J, Kagaya H, Shimizu Y, Hokari K, Tsukagoshi H, Shinomura Y, Fujita M (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:255–264 264.e251–252Google Scholar