Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 2480–2487 | Cite as

Educational system based on the TAPP checklist improves the performance of novices: a multicenter randomized trial

  • Saseem Poudel
  • Yo Kurashima
  • Kimitaka Tanaka
  • Hiroshi Kawase
  • Yoichi M. Ito
  • Fumitaka Nakamura
  • Toshiaki Shichinohe
  • Satoshi Hirano
Article

Abstract

Background

Despite recent developments in surgical education, obstacles including inadequate budget, limited human resources, and a scarcity of time have limited its widespread adoption. To provide systematic training for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, we had previously developed and validated a checklist to evaluate the recorded performance of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. We had also developed an educational system that included didactic materials based on the TAPP checklist and incorporated remote evaluation and feedback system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational impact of the TAPP education system on novice surgeons.

Methods

Residents and surgeons from participating hospitals, who had performed 0 or 1 TAPP procedure, were randomly assigned to the intervention group (IG), who trained using this new educational tool, and the control group (CG), who trained using the conventional system. Their surgical videos were rated by blinded raters. All participants performed their first case prior to randomization. The primary outcome was improvement of TAPP checklist score from the first to the third case.

Results

Eighteen participants from 9 institutes were recruited for this study. Seven participants in the IG and 5 participants in the CG were included in the final analysis. The participants in the IG demonstrated significant improvement in their TAPP performance (p = 0.044) from their first case to their third case, whereas their counterparts in the CG failed to make any significant progress during the same period (p = 0.581).

Conclusion

The new TAPP educational system was effective in improving the TAPP performance of novice surgeons.

Keywords

Surgical education Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair Assessment and feedback Remote education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the surgeons from the participating institutes, for helping us with this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Yo Kurashima is a consultant at Ethicon and Medicon. Saseem Poudel, Kimitaka Tanaka, Hiroshi Kawase, Yoichi M Ito, Fumitaka Nakamura, Toshiaki Shichinohe, and Satoshi Hirano have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Tsuda S, Scott D, Doyle J, Jones DB (2009) Surgical skills training and simulation. Curr Probl Surg 46:271–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kurashima Y, Feldman LS, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Bergman S, Demyttenaere SV, Li C, Vassiliou MC (2014) Simulation-based training improves the operative performance of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28:783–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, Huebner M, Dunn WF, Sarr MG, Farley DR (2011) Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 254:502–509 (discussion 509–511)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borel-Rinkes IH, Gouma DJ, Hamming JF (2008) Surgical training in the Netherlands. World J Surg 32:2172–2177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins JP, Civil ID, Sugrue M, Balogh Z, Chehade MJ (2008) Surgical education and training in Australia and New Zealand. World J Surg 32:2138–2144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishihara Y, Isobe Y, Kitagawa Y (2017) Validation of newly developed physical laparoscopy simulator in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5614-x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurashima Y, Watanabe Y, Ebihara Y, Murakami S, Shichinohe T, Hirano S (2016) Where do we start? The first survey of surgical residency education in Japan. Am J Surg 211:405–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bode CO, Nwawolo CC, Giwa-Osagie OF (2008) Surgical education at the West African College of Surgeons. World J Surg 32:2162–2166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kostakis A, Mantas D (2008) Surgical education in Greece. World J Surg 32:2167–2171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shen BY, Zhan Q (2008) Surgical education in China. World J Surg 32:2145–2149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Udwadia TE, Sen G (2008) Surgical training in India. World J Surg 32:2150–2155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bokeler U, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Zacheja S, Smaxwil C (2013) Teaching and training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Surg Endosc 27:2886–2893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY (2012) Learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Can J Surg 55:33–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poudel S, Kurashima Y, Kawarada Y, Watanabe Y, Murakami Y, Matsumura Y, Kato H, Miyazaki K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S (2016) Development and validation of a checklist for assessing recorded performance of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 212:468–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A, Kingsnorth AN, Mandala V, Palot JP, Schumpelick V, Simmermacher RK, Stoppa R, Flament JB (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11:113–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM (2008) Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22:1887–1893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL (2014) Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Sci 25:1608–1618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhatti NI, Ahmed A (2015) Improving skills development in residency using a deliberate-practice and learner-centered model. Laryngoscope 125(Suppl 8):S1–S14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hashimoto DA, Sirimanna P, Gomez ED, Beyer-Berjot L, Ericsson KA, Williams NN, Darzi A, Aggarwal R (2015) Deliberate practice enhances quality of laparoscopic surgical performance in a randomized controlled trial: from arrested development to expert performance. Surg Endosc 29:3154–3162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirkman MA (2013) Deliberate practice, domain-specific expertise, and implications for surgical education in current climes. J Surg Educ 70:309–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nesbitt JC, St Julien J, Absi TS, Ahmad RM, Grogan EL, Balaguer JM, Lambright ES, Deppen SA, Wu H, Putnam JB (2013) Tissue-based coronary surgery simulation: medical student deliberate practice can achieve equivalency to senior surgery residents. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:1453–1458 (discussion 1458–1459)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Udani AD, Harrison TK, Mariano ER, Derby R, Kan J, Ganaway T, Shum C, Gaba DM, Tanaka P, Kou A, Howard SK (2016) Comparative-effectiveness of simulation-based deliberate practice versus self-guided practice on resident anesthesiologists’ acquisition of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia skills. Reg Anesth Pain Med 41:151–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saseem Poudel
    • 1
  • Yo Kurashima
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kimitaka Tanaka
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Kawase
    • 1
  • Yoichi M. Ito
    • 3
  • Fumitaka Nakamura
    • 4
  • Toshiaki Shichinohe
    • 1
  • Satoshi Hirano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IIHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
  2. 2.Clinical Simulation CenterHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.Department of BiostatisticsHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryTeine Keijinkai HospitalSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations