Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single-site robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children and adolescents: a report of 20 cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-site laparoscopy is increasingly popular for straightforward operations like appendectomy. Due to limited triangulation and maneuverability, single-site cholecystectomy is riskier and more difficult. Robotics offer to make it easier and safer.

Methods

Twenty children and adolescents underwent robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy at a large academic children’s hospital. Patients were not randomized; patients were offered the option of robotic-assisted single-site (SSR) or standard four-incision laparoscopic (LAP) cholecystectomy. Demographics and perioperative details were compared with those of a comparable cohort who underwent LAP during the same period.

Results

The two groups were similar in physical characteristics and indications for operation. The robotic operations took longer but both groups received similar PRN doses of parenteral opiates. Patients in the SSR group were all discharged on the first postoperative day. There were no major complications in either group but a slightly higher incidence of minor wound complications in the SSR group.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy appears to be a safe alternative to standard laparoscopy with a similar postoperative pain profile, short postoperative lengths of stay, and, for some, a superior cosmetic result. Nevertheless, it comes with longer set-up and operative times, a higher incidence of minor wound complications, an unknown but possibly higher risk of incisional hernia, and higher costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clements RH, Holcomb GW 3rd (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Curr Opin Pediatr 10(3):310–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai SW, Rothenberg SS, Kay SM, Shipman KE, Slater BJ (2017) Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:845–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emami CN, Garrett D, Anselmo D, Torres M, Nguyen NX (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: a feasible alternative to the standard laparoscopic approach. J Pediatr Surg 46(10):1909–1912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seims AD, Nice TR, Mortellaro VE, Lacher M, Ba’Ath ME, Anderson SA, Beierle EA, Martin CA, Rogers DA, Harmon CM, Chen MK, Russell RT (2015) Routine utilization of single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES): a 5-year institutional experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(3):252–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen EN, Muensterer OJ, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2011) Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: lessons learned from our first 224 laparoendoscopic single-site procedures in children. Pediatr Surg Int 27(6):643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147(8):709–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146(10):1122–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26(6):1648–1655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P, Pugin F, Buehler L, Azagury DE, Jung M, Volonte F, Hagen ME (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):18–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kudsi OY, Castellanos A, Kaza S, McCarty J, Dickens E, Martin D, Tiesenga FM, Konstantinidis K, Hirides P, Mehendale S, Gonzalez A (2016) Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg 260(1):134–141, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn N, Signor G, Singh TP, Stain S, Whyte C (2015) Robotic single- and multisite cholecystectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(12):1033–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones VS (2015) Robotic-assisted single-site cholecystectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 50(11):1842–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tasian GE (2015) Casale P.The robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: gateway to advanced reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am 42(1):89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cundy TP, Shetty K, Clark J, Chang TP, Sriskandarajah K, Gattas NE, Najmaldin A, Yang GZ, Darzi A (2013) The first decade of robotic surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 48(4):858–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee YL, Kilic GS, Phelps JY (2011) Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(4):512–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Geiger JD, Hirschl RB (2015) Innovation in surgical technology and techniques: challenges and ethical issues. Semin Pediatr Surg 24(3):115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Larson JA, Johnson MH, Bhayani SB (2014) Application of surgical safety standards to robotic surgery: five principles of ethics for nonmaleficence. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):290–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blinman T (2010) Incisions do not simply sum. Surg Endosc 24(7):1746–1751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. St Peter SD, Ostlie D (2011) The necessity for prospective evidence for single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 20(4):232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dalton BG, Gonzalez KW, Knott EM, St Peter SD, Aguayo P (2015) Same day discharge after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children. J Surg Res 195(2):418–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel SV, Van Koughnett JA, Howe B, Wexner SD (2015) Spin is common in studies assessing robotic colorectal surgery: an assessment of reporting and interpretation of study results. Dis Colon Rectum 58(9):878–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boys JA, Alicuben ET, DeMeester MJ, Worrell SG, Oh DS, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR (2016) Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them. Surg Endosc 30(4):1310–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton JD, Agarwala A (2017) Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surg Endosc 31(1):255–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Peter Mattei

  2. General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street & Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104-4399, USA

    Peter Mattei

Authors
  1. Peter Mattei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Mattei.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Dr. Mattei has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mattei, P. Single-site robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children and adolescents: a report of 20 cases. Surg Endosc 32, 2402–2408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5939-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5939-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation