Low-impact laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity in patients with sickle cell disease
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most frequent surgeries performed in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). LC in SCD patients is associated with a particularly high postoperative morbidity. The aim of the present study is to assess the safety and feasibility of cholecystectomy performed by mini-laparoscopy with low- and stable-pressure pneumoperitoneum (MLC + LSPP) and to compare the rate of postoperative SCD-related morbidity with standard LC.
Thirty-five consecutive SCD patients admitted between November 2015 and March 2017 for cholelithiasis requiring surgery were compared with an historical cohort of 126 SCD patients who underwent LC for the same indication. Operative variables, postoperative outcomes, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and costs were evaluated.
MLC + LSPP exhibited a mean operative time comparable to LC (p = 0.169). Operative blood loss was significantly reduced in the MLC + LSPP group, and the suction device was rarely used (p = 0.036). SCD-related morbidity (including acute chest syndrome) was significantly higher in the LC group compared with the MLC + LSPP group (18.3 vs. 2.9%; p = 0.029). The mean times to resume ambulation (p = 0.018) and regular diet (p = 0.045) were significantly reduced in the MLC + LSPP group. The mean incision length (all trocars combined) was 28.22 mm for MLC + LSPP and 49.64 mm for LC patients (p < 0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the only significant predictor of postoperative SCD-related morbidity was the surgical approach (odds ratio: 9.24). Patient and surgeon satisfaction were very high for MLC + LSPP. The mean total cost per patient (surgery and hospitalization) was not different between groups (p = 0.084).
MLC + LSPP in SCD patients appears to be safe and feasible. Compared with LC, MLC + LSPP in SCD patients is associated with a significantly reduced incidence of postoperative SCD-related morbidity and more rapid ambulation and return to regular diet without increasing the total costs per patient.
KeywordsSickle cell disease Micro-laparoscopy Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum Low-impact laparoscopy Cholecystectomy
Compliance with ethical standards
Nicola de’Angelis, Solafah Abdalla, Maria Clotilde Carra, Vincenzo Lizzi, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Anoosha Habibi, Pablo Bartolucci, Frédéric Galactéros, Alexis Laurent, and Francesco Brunetti have no conflicts of interest to disclose with regard to the results of this study.
- 2.Gomes E, Castetbon K, Goulet V (2015) Sickle-cell related mortality in France: age and causes of death. Bulletin Epidemiologique HebdomadaireGoogle Scholar
- 3.Habibi A, Arlet JB, Stankovic K, Gellen-Dautremer J, Ribeil JA, Bartolucci P, Lionnet F, centre de reference maladies r (2015) [French guidelines for the management of adult sickle cell disease: 2015 update]. Rev Med Interne 36:5S3-84Google Scholar
- 8.Haberkern CM, Neumayr LD, Orringer EP, Earles AN, Robertson SM, Black D, Abboud MR, Koshy M, Idowu O, Vichinsky EP (1997) Cholecystectomy in sickle cell anemia patients: perioperative outcome of 364 cases from the National Preoperative Transfusion Study. Preoperative Transfusion in Sickle Cell Disease Study Group. Blood 89:1533–1542PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Koshy M, Weiner SJ, Miller ST, Sleeper LA, Vichinsky E, Brown AK, Khakoo Y, Kinney TR (1995) Surgery and anesthesia in sickle cell disease. Cooper Study Sickle Cell Dis Blood 86:3676–3684Google Scholar
- 24.Alhashemi M, Almahroos M, Fiore JF Jr, Kaneva P, Gutierrez JM, Neville A, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2017) Impact of miniport laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard port laparoscopic cholecystectomy on recovery of physical activity: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 31:2299–2309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR (2014) Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006930Google Scholar
- 29.Habibi A, Mekontso-Dessap A, Guillaud C, Michel M, Razazi K, Khellaf M, Chami B, Bachir D, Rieux C, Melica G, Godeau B, Galacteros F, Bartolucci P, Pirenne F (2016) Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction in adult sickle-cell disease: presentations, outcomes, and treatments of 99 referral center episodes. Am J Hematol 91:989–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Meyer C, de Manzini N, Rohr S, Thiry CL, Perim-Kalil FC, Bachellier-Billot C (1993) [1000 cases of cholecystectomy: 500 by laparotomy versus 500 by laparoscopy]. J Chir 130:501–506Google Scholar
- 40.Bhattacharjee HK, Jalaludeen A, Bansal V, Krishna A, Kumar S, Subramanium R, Ramachandran R, Misra M (2017) Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31:1287–1295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 56.Farley DR, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR (2004) Double-blind, prospective, randomized study of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139:739–743. [discussion 743–734]CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 62.Joshipura VP, Haribhakti SP, Patel NR, Naik RP, Soni HN, Patel B, Bhavsar MS, Narwaria MB, Thakker R (2009) A prospective randomized, controlled study comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:234–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar