Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy
- 316 Downloads
In this study, cytokine levels, outcome, and survival rates after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were retrospectively investigated in a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between the thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) in the prone position and open esophagectomy (OE).
Patients and Methods
Between 2005 and 2014, TE was performed on a group of 85 patients, which was compared with a group of 104 OE cases. Eventually, 65 paired cases were matched using propensity score matching.
Although the TE group underwent a significantly longer operation time than the OE group (P < 0.001), the TE group exhibited less blood loss (P < 0.001) and had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.038) than the OE group. The serum interleukin-6 levels on ICU admission (P < 0.001) and on POD 1 (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the TE group. The interleukin-10 levels on ICU admission (P < 0.001), POD 1 (P = 0.016), and POD 3 (P < 0.001) were also significantly lower in the TE group. Pulmonary complication was significantly lower in the TE group (P = 0.043). The 5-year PFS rates in the TE and OE groups were 70.6 and 58.7% (P = 0.328), respectively, and OS rates were 64.9 and 50.2% (P = 0.101), respectively.
TE compared to OE is a less invasive procedure with lower surgical stress and less pulmonary complication for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
KeywordsEsophageal cancer Minimally invasive surgery Cytokines Surgical stress Prone position
The study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24791379.
Compliance with ethical standards
Shoichi Hazama received research funding from NEC Corporation and Toyo Kohan Corporation. All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Drs. Kanekiyo, Drs. Takeda, Drs. Tsutsui, Drs. Nishiyama, Drs. Kitahara, Drs. Shindo, Drs. Tokumitsu, Drs. Tomochika, Drs. Tokuhisa, Drs. Iida, Drs. Sakamoto, Drs. Suzuki, Drs. Yamamoto, Drs. Yoshino, Drs. Ueno, Drs. Nagano have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Cancer Registry and Statistics. Cancer Information Service NCC, Japan. http://ganjoho.jp/public/index.html
- 3.Tachimori Y, Ozawa S, Numasaki H, Fujishiro M, Matsubara H, Oyama T, Shinoda M, Toh Y, Udagawa H, Uno T, Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer of the Japan Esophageal S (2016) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2009. Esophagus 13:110–137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, Brigand C, Carrere N, Collet D, Doddoli C, Flamein R, Mabrut JY, Meunier B, Msika S, Perniceni T, Peschaud F, Prudhomme M, Triboulet JP, Mariette C (2011) Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial—the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer 11:310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, Verhage RJ, Besselink MG, Prins MJ, Haverkamp L, Schippers C, Rinkes IH, Joore HC, Ten Kate FJ, Koffijberg H, Kroese CC, van Leeuwen MS, Lolkema MP, Reerink O, Schipper ME, Steenhagen E, Vleggaar FP, Voest EE, Siersema PD, van Hillegersberg R (2012) Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials 13:230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kim T, Hochwald SN, Sarosi GA, Caban AM, Rossidis G, Ben-David K (2012) Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies. Gastroenterol Res Prac 2012:683213Google Scholar
- 12.Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132 quiz 133–134; discussion 196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, van Hoogstraten IM, vd Pas MH, Meijerink WJ, vd Peet DL, vd Tol MP, Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:53–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Tsujimoto H, Takahata R, Nomura S, Yaguchi Y, Kumano I, Matsumoto Y, Yoshida K, Horiguchi H, Hiraki S, Ono S, Yamamoto J, Hase K (2012) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer attenuates postoperative systemic responses and pulmonary complications. Surgery 151:667–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, Nakajima K, Kurokawa Y, Mori M, Doki Y (2011) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: comparative analysis of open and hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal lymphadenectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 104:623–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hirai T, Matsumoto H, Yamashita K, Urakami A, Iki K, Yamamura M, Tsunoda T (2005) Surgical oncotaxis–excessive surgical stress and postoperative complications contribute to enhancing tumor metastasis, resulting in a poor prognosis for cancer patients. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:4–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Barbic J, Ivic D, Alkhamis T, Drenjancevic D, Ivic J, Harsanji-Drenjancevic I, Turina I, Vcev A (2013) Kinetics of changes in serum concentrations of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein after elective abdominal surgery. Can it be used to detect postoperative complications? Coll Antropol 37:195–201PubMedGoogle Scholar