Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 2159–2164 | Cite as

Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty: procedure evolution from first-in-man cases through current technique

  • Nitin Kumar
  • Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
  • Gontrand Lopez-Nava Breviere
  • Manoel P. Galvao Neto
  • Nicole P. Sahdala
  • Sohail N. Shaikh
  • Robert H. Hawes
  • Christopher J. Gostout
  • Mahesh K. Goenka
  • Jorge R. Orillac
  • Alonso Alvarado
  • Pichamol Jirapinyo
  • Natan Zundel
  • Christopher C. Thompson
New Technology

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty (ESG) has evolved over time. With the advent of full-thickness endoscopic suturing, an efficient technique for ESG was developed and refined.

Methods

This prospective first-in-man trial started in April 2012 and represents the first use of full-thickness endoscopic suturing for primary obesity therapy. The trial focused on procedure development, reproducibility, safety, and short-term efficacy. The trial was performed at centers in five countries, in three phases. Phase I was evaluation of safety and technical feasibility of various procedure techniques; stitch patterns and sequences were assessed for efficiency, safety, and feasibility. Phase II entailed continued procedure refinement to establish a standardized technique. Phase III entailed evaluation of technical feasibility and weight loss outcomes in 77 patients; the procedure was performed using the standardized technique, and there was no procedure development. Data were prospectively collected into a registry.

Results

In Phase I, the procedure was created and modified to improve time efficiency. Safety and technical feasibility were established, and short-term weight loss was demonstrated. In Phase II, a number of stitch patterns were attempted, and the stitch pattern was modified and finalized. 22 patients were included, and 1-year total weight loss was 17.3 ± 2.6%. In Phase III, conformity with the final technique was high. 77 patients were included, with a mean BMI of 36.1 ± 0.6 kg/m2. Mean weight loss was 16.0 ± 0.8% at 6 months and 17.4 ± 1.2% at 12 months (n = 44). Postprocedural nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain were frequently reported; there were no reported significant adverse events post-procedure or during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Following a methodical procedure development phase, ESG demonstrated safety and short-term efficacy in this trial. The procedure also achieved meaningful weight loss during the follow-up period.

Keywords

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty Endoscopic bariatric Bariatric endoscopy Obesity Bariatric surgery Weight loss surgery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Drs. Abu Dayyeh, Lopez-Nava Breviere, Galvao Neto, Shaikh, Hawes, Gostout, Goenka, Orillac, Alvarado, Zundel, and Thompson received an Institutional clinical research grant from Apollo Endosurgery to perform the procedures in this study. Drs. Abu Dayyeh, Lopez-Nava Breviere, Galvao Neto, Shaikh, Gostout, Zundel, and Thompson are Consultants for Apollo Endosurgery. Drs. Kumar, Sahdala, and Jirapinyo have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Ng M, Fleming T, The GBD 2013 Obesity Collaboration et al (2014) Global, regional and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults 1980–2013: a systematic analysis. Lancet 384(9945):766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson EE, Simpson AN, Harvey JB, Lockett MA, Byrne KT, Simpson KN (2016) Trends in bariatric surgery, 2002–2012: do changes parallel the obesity trend? Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(2):398–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson CC, Carr-Locke DL, Saltzman J (2004) Peroral endoscopic repair of staple-line dehiscence in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a less invasive approach [abstract]. Gastroenterology 126(4, Suppl 2):A-810Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brethauer SA, Chand B, Schauer PR, Thompson CC (2012) Transoral gastric volume reduction as intervention for weight management: 12-month follow-up of TRIM trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(3):296–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y, De La Fuente R (2008 Jul) Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 68(1):51–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar N, Sahdala HN, Shaikh S et al (2014) Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for primary therapy of obesity: initial human cases. Gastroenterology 146(5):S571–S572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abu Dayyeh BK, Acosta A, Camilleri M, Mundi MS, Rajan E, Topazian MD, Gostout CJ (2017) Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty alters gastric physiology and induces loss of body weight in obese individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(1):37–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lopez-Nava G, Galvão MP, da Bautista-Castaño I et al (2015) Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for the treatment of obesity. Endoscopy 47:449–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharaiha RZ, Kedia P, Kumta N, DeFilippis EM, Gaidhane M, Shukla A, Aronne LJ, Kahaleh M (2015) Initial experience with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: technical success and reproducibility in the bariatric population. Endoscopy 47(2):164–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sullivan S, Kumar N, Edmundowicz SA, Abu Dayyeh BK, Jonnalagadda SS, Larsen M, Thompson CC, ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force (2015) ASGE position statement on endoscopic bariatric therapies in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 82(5):767–772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nitin Kumar
    • 1
  • Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
    • 2
  • Gontrand Lopez-Nava Breviere
    • 3
  • Manoel P. Galvao Neto
    • 4
  • Nicole P. Sahdala
    • 5
  • Sohail N. Shaikh
    • 6
  • Robert H. Hawes
    • 7
  • Christopher J. Gostout
    • 2
  • Mahesh K. Goenka
    • 8
  • Jorge R. Orillac
    • 9
  • Alonso Alvarado
    • 9
  • Pichamol Jirapinyo
    • 10
  • Natan Zundel
    • 11
  • Christopher C. Thompson
    • 10
    • 12
  1. 1.Bariatric Endoscopy InstituteAddisonUSA
  2. 2.Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Madrid Sanchinarro University HospitalMadridSpain
  4. 4.Gastro Obeso CenterSao PauloBrazil
  5. 5.Universidad Nacional Pedro Henriquez UrenaSanto DomingoDominican Republic
  6. 6.Center for Bariatric EndoscopyMontclairUSA
  7. 7.Florida HospitalOrlandoUSA
  8. 8.Apollo Gleneagles HospitalKolkataIndia
  9. 9.Clinica Hospital San FernandoPanama CityPanama
  10. 10.Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  11. 11.Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of MedicineMiamiUSA
  12. 12.Director of Therapeutic Endoscopy, Division of GastroenterologyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations