Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 1368–1376 | Cite as

Establishing the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms

  • Lawrence Lee
  • Justin Kelly
  • George J. Nassif
  • Deborah Keller
  • Teresa C. Debeche-Adams
  • Paul A. Mancuso
  • John R. Monson
  • Matthew R. Albert
  • Sam B. Atallah
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an endoscopic operating platform for local excision of rectal neoplasms. However, it may be technically demanding, and its learning curve has yet to be adequately defined. The objective of this study was to determine the number of TAMIS procedures for the local excision of rectal neoplasm required to reach proficiency.

Methods and procedures

All TAMIS cases performed from 07/2009 to 12/2016 at a single high-volume tertiary care institution for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia were identified from a prospective database. A cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was performed to determine the number of cases required to reach proficiency. The main proficiency outcome was rate of margin positivity (R1 resection). The acceptable and unacceptable R1 rates were defined as the R1 rate of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM—10%) and traditional transanal excision (TAE—26%), which was obtained from previously published meta-analyses. Comparisons of patient, tumor, and operative characteristics before and after TAMIS proficiency were performed.

Results

A total of 254 TAMIS procedures were included in this study. The overall R1 resection rate was 7%. The indication for TAMIS was malignancy in 57%. CUSUM analysis reported that TAMIS reached an acceptable R1 rate between 14 and 24 cases. Moving average plots also showed that the mean operative times stabilized by proficiency gain. The mean lesion size was larger after proficiency gain (3.0 cm (SD 1.5) vs. 2.3 cm (SD 1.3), p = 0.008). All other patient, tumor, and operative characteristics were similar before and after proficiency gain.

Conclusions

TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasms is a complex procedure that requires a minimum of 14–24 cases to reach an acceptable R1 resection rate and lower operative duration.

Keywords

Transanal minimally invasive surgery Local excision Learning curve 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

deBeche-Adams reports consultant’s fees from Applied Medical. Atallah reports consultant’s fees from Applied Medical, THD American, Medicaroid, and Conmed. Albert reports consultant’s fees from Applied Medical, Stryker, and Conmed, and stock options from Applied Medical. Mancuso reports consultant’s fees from Applied Medical and Mallinckrodt. Lee, Kelly, Keller, Nassif, and Monson have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Allaix ME, Fichera A (2013) Modern rectal cancer multidisciplinary treatment: the role of radiation and surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2921–2928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atallah S, Keller D (2015) Why the conventional parks transanal excision for early stage rectal cancer should be abandoned. Dis Colon Rectum 58:1211–1214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bentrem DJ, Okabe S, Wong WD, Guillem JG, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Ben-Porat LS, Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Paty PB (2005) T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery? Ann Surg 242:472–477PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P, Hestvik UE, Bjerkeset T, Wibe A, Norwegian Rectal Cancer G (2005) Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1380–1388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chakravarti A, Compton CC, Shellito PC, Wood WC, Landry J, Machuta SR, Kaufman D, Ancukiewicz M, Willett CG (1999) Long-term follow-up of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation. Ann Surg 230:49–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stitzenberg KB, Sanoff HK, Penn DC, Meyers MO, Tepper JE (2013) Practice patterns and long-term survival for early-stage rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:4276–4282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, Chang GJ, Rafferty JF, Buie WD, Rafferty J, Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of C, Rectal S (2013) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 56:535–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1030 discussion 1030–1021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buess G, Theiss R, Gunther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H (1985) Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy 17:31–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:254–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demartines N, von Flue MO, Harder FH (2001) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg 25:870–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten EC, Hoff C, Dekker E, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ (2013) Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 27:3591–3602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maya A, Vorenberg A, Oviedo M, da Silva G, Wexner SD, Sands D (2014) Learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28:1407–1412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 56:301–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, Larach S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 18:473–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keller DS, Tahilramani RN, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Mahmood A, Haas EM (2016) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: review of indications and outcomes from 75 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 222:814–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee L, Burke JP, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Martin-Perez B, Monson JR, Albert MR, Atallah SB (2017) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia: outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up. Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002190 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bolsin S, Colson M (2000) The use of the Cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12:433–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Pemberton JH, Cima RR (2012) Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery. Arch Surg 147:317–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Wu JS, Strong SA, Poloneicki JD, Hull TL, Church JM (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 241:262–268CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langer C, Liersch T, Suss M, Siemer A, Markus P, Ghadimi BM, Fuzesi L, Becker H (2003) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:222–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    de Graaf EJ, Burger JW, van Ijsseldijk AL, Tetteroo GW, Dawson I, Hop WC (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 13:762–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lebedyev A, Tulchinsky H, Rabau M, Klausner JM, Krausz M, Duek SD (2009) Long-term results of local excision for T1 rectal carcinoma: the experience of two colorectal units. Tech Coloproctol 13:231–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christoforidis D, Cho HM, Dixon MR, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, Finne CO (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Ann Surg 249:776–782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S (2014) A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol 18:775–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, Dindo D, Rega D, Delrio P (2015) Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis 17:397–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morino M, Allaix ME, Famiglietti F, Caldart M, Arezzo A (2013) Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and long-term outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery? Surg Endosc 27:181–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramwell A, Evans J, Bignell M, Mathias J, Simson J (2009) The creation of a peritoneal defect in transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase complications. Colorectal Dis 11:964–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baatrup G, Borschitz T, Cunningham C, Qvist N (2009) Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise. Surg Endosc 23:2680–2683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, Tuynman JB, Mortensen NJ (2014) Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. Br J Surg 101:578–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Ponzano C (2015) Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision: the key against the Achilles’ heel of rectal cancer? Ann Surg 261:e120–e121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Helewa RM, Rajaee AN, Raiche I, Williams L, Paquin-Gobeil M, Boushey RP, Moloo H (2016) The implementation of a transanal endoscopic microsurgery programme: initial experience with surgical performance. Colorectal Dis 18:1057–1062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. BMJ 318:887–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:238–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH (2013) The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3297–3307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Diaz-Pavon JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:815-821Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21:829–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2001) Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess 5:1–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG (2007) Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J 83:777–779CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kidane B, Chadi SA, Kanters S, Colquhoun PH, Ott MC (2015) Local resection compared with radical resection in the treatment of T1N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:122–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Atallah SB, Albert MR (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): is one better than the other? Surg Endosc 27:4750–4751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Melin AA, Kalaskar S, Taylor L, Thompson JS, Ternent C, Langenfeld SJ (2016) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: is one technique superior? Am J Surg 212:1063–1067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arezzo A, Passera R, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Kobayashi N, Sakamoto N, Yoshida N, Naito Y, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, Ohya T, Ohata K, Okamura S, Iizuka S, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Fusaroli P, Bonino MA, Verra M, Morino M (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 28:427–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Campbell ML, Vadas KJ, Rasheid SH, Marcet JE, Sanchez JE (2014) A reproducible ex vivo model for transanal minimally invasive surgery. JSLS 18:62–65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JR, Simson JN, Lane L, Merrie A, Warren B, Mortensen NJ, Association of Coloproctology of Great B, Ireland Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery C (2009) A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:280–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Lee
    • 1
  • Justin Kelly
    • 1
  • George J. Nassif
    • 1
  • Deborah Keller
    • 2
  • Teresa C. Debeche-Adams
    • 1
  • Paul A. Mancuso
    • 1
  • John R. Monson
    • 1
  • Matthew R. Albert
    • 1
  • Sam B. Atallah
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryFlorida HospitalOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryBaylor University Medical CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations