Abstract
Background
Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at a higher risk for postoperative respiratory complications. Despite the benefits of a minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum can substantially reduce functional residual capacity and raise alveolar dead space, potentially increasing the risk of respiratory failure which may be poorly tolerated by COPD patients. This raises controversy as to whether open techniques should be preferentially employed in this population.
Methods
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2014 was used to examine the clinical data from patients with COPD who electively underwent laparoscopic and open colectomy. Patients defined as having COPD demonstrated either functional disability, chronic use of bronchodilators, prior COPD-related hospitalization, or reduced forced expiratory reserve volumes on lung testing (FEV1 <75%). Demographic data and preoperative characteristics were compared. Linear and logistic regressions were utilized to perform multivariate analysis and determine risk-adjusted outcomes.
Results
Of the 4397 patients with COPD, 53.8% underwent laparoscopic colectomy (LC) while 46.2% underwent open colectomy (OC). The LC and OC groups were similar with respect to demographic data and preoperative comorbidities. Equivalent frequencies of exertional dyspnea (LC 35.4 vs OC 37.7%, P = 0.11) were noted. After multivariate risk adjustment, OC demonstrated an increased rate of overall respiratory complications including pneumonia, reintubation, and prolonged ventilator dependency when compared to LC (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.30–1.98, P < 0.01). OC was associated with longer length of stay (10 ± 8 vs. 6.7 ± 7 days, P < 0.01) and higher readmission (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09–1.68, P < 0.01) compared to LC.
Conclusion
Despite the potential risks of laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum in the susceptible COPD population, a minimally invasive approach was associated with lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications, shorter length of stay, and decrease in postoperative morbidity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Kiran RP (2016) Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Surg Endosc 30:5275–5282
Li Y, Wang S, Gao S et al (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal resection versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy. Tech Coloproctol 20:153–162
Arozullah AM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG et al (2001) Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 135:847–857
Ntutumu R, Liu H, Zhen L et al (2016) Risk factors for pulmonary complications following laparoscopic gastrectomy: a single-center study. Medicine 95:e4567
Salihoglu Z, Demiroluk S, Baca B et al (2008) Effects of pneumoperitoneum and positioning on respiratory mechanics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during Nissen fundoplication. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:437–440
Wirth S, Biesemann A, Spaeth J et al (2017) Pneumoperitoneum deteriorates intratidal respiratory system mechanics: an observational study in lung-healthy patients. Surg Endosc 31:753–760
Chang HM, Lee SW, Nomura E et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with COPD. J Surg Oncol 100:456–458
American College of Surgeons, ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip
Fitzgerald SD, Andrus CH, Baudendistel LJ et al (1992) Hypercarbia during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg 163:186–190
Meftahuzzaman SM, Islam MM, Chowdhury KK et al (2013) Haemodynamic and end tidal CO(2) changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. Mymensingh Med J 22:473–477
Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-khoury SI et al (2006) Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth 18:67–78
Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C et al (1999) Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation. Arch Surg 134:6–12
Marks JH, Kawun UB, Hamdan W et al (2008) Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 22:1899–1904
Stolbrink M, McGowan L, Saman H et al (2014) The Early Mobility Bundle: a simple enhancement of therapy which may reduce incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia and length of hospital stay. J Hosp Infect 88:34–39
Kelkar KV (2015) Post-operative pulmonary complications after non-cardiothoracic surgery. Indian J Anaesth 59:599–605
Schwenk W, Bohm B, Muller JM (1998) Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections.A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12:1131–1136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. Jafari is a consultant for Medrobotics and receives an educational grant from Medtronic. Dr. Mills, Dr. Carmichael, Dr. Stamos, and Dr. Pigazzi all recieve an education grant from Ethicon and Medtronic. Drs. Sujatha Bhaskar, Alizadeh, Inaba, and Koh have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sujatha-Bhaskar, S., Alizadeh, R.F., Inaba, C.S. et al. Respiratory complications after colonic procedures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does laparoscopy offer a benefit?. Surg Endosc 32, 1280–1285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5805-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5805-5