Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery using a collar access: experience in 246 cases with the CEViTS technique
The arguments for applying minimally invasive techniques are, besides cosmetic results, reduced access trauma and less postoperative pain. In thyroid surgery, cosmetic aspects are gaining importance. Whether minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery is less painful has not been shown yet.
In this study, we analyse the outcome of 246 patients who underwent cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) regarding the surgery itself, their postoperative pain and satisfaction with the procedure.
CEViTS is routinely performed in our hospital. In this study, no postoperative bleedings that would have made a reoperation necessary occurred. All lobectomies could be completed endoscopically. In two cases, conversions (enlargement of the 5-mm incision to 25 mm) were necessary. Transient nerve palsy was registered in three patients (1.22%). One patient (0.41%) had a permanent palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In comparison to open surgery (n = 173 patients), the 246 CEViTS patients had a significantly lower pain level (p = 0.047).
Cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) can be considered a safe, less traumatizing and useful minimally invasive procedure in endoscopic thyroid surgery.
KeywordsEndoscopic thyroid surgery Collar access CEViTS Endoscopic thyroidectomy Minimally invasive thyroid surgery Postoperative pain
Compliance with ethical standards
Franz Messenbaeck, Michael Weitzendorfer, Cornelia Kaminski and Kai Witzel have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. All authors do disclose all institutional or corporate/commercial relationships.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 256444 kb)
- 2.Dralle H, Sekulla C, Haerting J, Timmermann W, Neumann HJ, Kruse E, Grond S, Muhlig HP, Richter C, Voss J, Thomusch O, Lippert H, Gastinger I, Brauckhoff M, Gimm O (2004) Risk factors of paralysis and functional outcome after recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. Surgery 136(6):1310–1322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kang JB, Kim EY, Park YL, Park CH, Yun JS (2017) A comparison of postoperative pain after conventional open thyroidectomy and single-incision, gasless, endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomy: a single institute prospective study. Ann Surg Treat Res 92(1):9–14. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.92.1.9. Epub 2016 Dec 30 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Messenbaeck FG (2004) Endoskopische Schilddruesenchirurgie [endoscopic thyroid surgery]. Chir Prax 63:647–657Google Scholar
- 15.Cai C, Huang Y, Zhang T, Chai L, Wang G, Shi L, Wiegand S, Güldner C, Günzel T, Wilhelm T (2015) Anatomical study of surgical approaches for minimally invasive transoral thyroidectomy: eMIT and TOPP. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24(6):340–344. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1034728. Epub 2015 Apr 8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar