Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 1607–1612 | Cite as

Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery using a collar access: experience in 246 cases with the CEViTS technique

  • Franz G. Messenbaeck
  • Michael Weitzendorfer
  • Cornelia Kaminski
  • Kai Witzel
New Technology

Abstract

Background

The arguments for applying minimally invasive techniques are, besides cosmetic results, reduced access trauma and less postoperative pain. In thyroid surgery, cosmetic aspects are gaining importance. Whether minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery is less painful has not been shown yet.

Method

In this study, we analyse the outcome of 246 patients who underwent cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) regarding the surgery itself, their postoperative pain and satisfaction with the procedure.

Results

CEViTS is routinely performed in our hospital. In this study, no postoperative bleedings that would have made a reoperation necessary occurred. All lobectomies could be completed endoscopically. In two cases, conversions (enlargement of the 5-mm incision to 25 mm) were necessary. Transient nerve palsy was registered in three patients (1.22%). One patient (0.41%) had a permanent palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In comparison to open surgery (n = 173 patients), the 246 CEViTS patients had a significantly lower pain level (p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) can be considered a safe, less traumatizing and useful minimally invasive procedure in endoscopic thyroid surgery.

Keywords

Endoscopic thyroid surgery Collar access CEViTS Endoscopic thyroidectomy Minimally invasive thyroid surgery Postoperative pain 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure

Franz Messenbaeck, Michael Weitzendorfer, Cornelia Kaminski and Kai Witzel have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. All authors do disclose all institutional or corporate/commercial relationships.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 256444 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Witzel K, von Rahden BH, Stein HJ (2009) The effect of ultrasound dissection in thyroid surgery. Eur Surg Res 43:241–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dralle H, Sekulla C, Haerting J, Timmermann W, Neumann HJ, Kruse E, Grond S, Muhlig HP, Richter C, Voss J, Thomusch O, Lippert H, Gastinger I, Brauckhoff M, Gimm O (2004) Risk factors of paralysis and functional outcome after recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. Surgery 136(6):1310–1322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sessa L, Lombardi CP, De Crea C, Raffaelli M, Bellantone R (2017) Video-assisted endocrine neck surgery: state of the art. Updat Surg 69(2):199–204. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0467-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miccoli P, Rago R, Massi M, Panicucci E, Metelli MR, Berti P, Minuto MN (2010) Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation. Surg Endosc 24:2415–2417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang JB, Kim EY, Park YL, Park CH, Yun JS (2017) A comparison of postoperative pain after conventional open thyroidectomy and single-incision, gasless, endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomy: a single institute prospective study. Ann Surg Treat Res 92(1):9–14. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.92.1.9. Epub 2016 Dec 30 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witzel K, Benhidjeb T, Stark M, Draf W (2008) Stand und Stellenwert der video-assistierten Schilddrüsenchirurgie. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, Laryngorhinootologie 87(9):623–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G (2006) Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391(2):68–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Witzel K (2007) The axillary access in unilateral thyroid resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392(5):617–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T (2008) Cervical scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: axillo-bilateral-breast approach (ABBA). Surg Endosc 22(1):154–157. Epub 2007 Apr 13 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Witzel K, von Rahden BH, Kaminski C, Stein HJ (2008) The transoral access in endoscopic thyroid resection. Surg Endosc 22(8):1871–1875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anuwong A (2016) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a series of the first 60 human cases. World J Surg 40(3):491–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Messenbaeck FG (2004) Endoskopische Schilddruesenchirurgie [endoscopic thyroid surgery]. Chir Prax 63:647–657Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palazzo FF, Sebag F, Henry JF (2006) Endocrine surgical technique: endoscopic thyroidectomy via the lateral approach. Surg Endosc 20(2):339–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shimizu K, Tanaka S (2003) Asian perspective on endoscopic thyroidectomy – a review of 193 cases. Asian J Surg 26(2):92–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cai C, Huang Y, Zhang T, Chai L, Wang G, Shi L, Wiegand S, Güldner C, Günzel T, Wilhelm T (2015) Anatomical study of surgical approaches for minimally invasive transoral thyroidectomy: eMIT and TOPP. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24(6):340–344. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2015.1034728. Epub 2015 Apr 8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Witzel K, Benhidjeb T (2009) Monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in totally endoscopic thyroid surgery. Eur Surg Res 43(2):72–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witzel K (2009) Hybrid technologies for determining optimal approach in endoscopic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 23:456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benhidjeb T, Witzel K, Stark M, Mann O (2011) Transoral thyroid and parathyroid surgery: still experimental! Surg Endosc 25(7):2411–2413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benhidjeb T, Witzel K, Bärlehner E et al (2007) The natural orifice surgery concept. Vision and rationale for a paradigm shift. Chirurg 78:537–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilhelm T, Metzig A (2010) Video. Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy: first clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24:1757–1758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilhelm T, Metzig A (2011) Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy (eMIT): a prospective proof-of-concept study in humans. World J Surg 35:543–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karakas E, Steinfeldt T, Gockel A et al (2014) Transoral parathyroid surgery–a new alternative or nonsense? Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:741–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neugebauer EA, Becker M, Buess GF et al (2010) EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 24:1594–1615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benhidjeb T, Witzel K, Burghardt J et al (2010) Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy: ethical and patients’ safety considerations on the first clinical experience of an innovative approach. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1290-9 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Witzel K, Hellinger A, Kaminski C et al (2016) Endoscopic thyroidectomy: the transoral approach. Gland Surg 5:336–341CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kardinal Schwarzenberg Klinikum SchwarzachSchwarzach im PongauAustria
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryParacelsus Medical UniversitySalzburgAustria
  3. 3.Minimal Invasiv CenterHuenfeldGermany

Personalised recommendations