Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 1600–1606 | Cite as

Laparoscopic lens fogging: solving a common surgical problem in standard and robotic laparoscopes via a scientific model

  • Todd G. Manning
  • Nathan Papa
  • Marlon Perera
  • Shannon McGrath
  • Daniel Christidis
  • Munad Khan
  • Richard O’Beirne
  • Nicholas Campbell
  • Damien Bolton
  • Nathan Lawrentschuk
New Technology



Laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF) hampers vision and impedes operative efficiency. Attempts to reduce LLF have led to the development of various anti-fogging fluids and warming devices. Limited literature exists directly comparing these techniques. We constructed a model peritoneum to simulate LLF and to compare the efficacy of various anti-fogging techniques.

Materials and methods

Intraperitoneal space was simulated using a suction bag suspended within an 8 L container of water. LLF was induced by varying the temperature and humidity within the model peritoneum. Various anti-fogging techniques were assessed including scope warmers, FREDTM, ResoclearTM, chlorhexidine, betadine and immersion in heated saline. These products were trialled with and without the use of a disposable scope warmer. Vision scores were evaluated by the same investigator for all tests and rated according to a predetermined scale. Fogging was assessed for each product or technique 30 times and a mean vision rating was recorded.


All products tested imparted some benefit, but FREDTM performed better than all other techniques. Betadine and ResoclearTM performed no better than the use of a scope warmer alone. Immersion in saline prior to insertion resulted in decreased vision ratings. The robotic scope did not result in LLF within the model.


In standard laparoscopes, the most superior preventative measure was FREDTM utilised on a pre-warmed scope. Despite improvements in LLF with other products FREDTM was better than all other techniques. The robotic laparoscope performed superiorly regarding LLF compared to standard laparoscope.


Surgery Laparoscopic surgery Fogging Laparoscopic lens fogging Robotic surgery Laparoscopic equipment 



No funding was received to conduct this research. The manuscript has been seen and approved by all authors.

Compliance with ethical standards


The authors Dr. Todd G Manning, Dr. Nathan Papa, Dr. Marlon Perera, Dr. Shannon McGrath, Dr. Daniel Christidis, Dr. Munad Khan, Mr. Richard O’Beirne, Dr. Nicholas Campbell, Prof. Damien Bolton and A/Prof. Nathan Lawrentschuk have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, WK Health, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perissat J, Collet D, Belliard R, Dost C, Bikandou G (1990) Cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic treatment with intracorporeal lithotripsy followed by cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy. Personal technique. Chirurgie; Mémoires De L’académie De Chirurgie 116(3):243–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Kerbl K (1994) Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 330(6):409–419. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300608 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kitano S, Tomikawa M, Iso Y, Iwata S, Gondo K, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1992) A safe and simple method to maintain a clear field of vision during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 6(4):197–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner NE, Bolton DM (2010) Laparoscopic lens fogging: a review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field. J Endourol 6:905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manning TG, Perera M, Christidis D, Kinnear N, McGrath S, O’Beirne R, Zotov P, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N (2017) Visual occlusion during minimally invasive surgery: a contemporary review of methods to reduce laparoscopic and robotic lens fogging and other sources of optical loss. J Endourol. 31(4):327–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Deurzen DFP, Mannaerts GHH, Jakimowicz JJ, Cuschieri A (2005) Prevention of lens condensation in laparoscopic surgery by lens heating with a thermos flask. Surg Endosc 19(2):299–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schurr MO, Kunert W, Arezzo A, Buess G (1999) The role and future of endoscopic imaging systems. Endoscopy 31(7):557–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCain LA, Jones G (1995) Endoscopic techniques in aesthetic plastic surgery the hopkins rod lens system. Plast Surg Nurs 15(3):145–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown JA, Inocencio MD, Sundaram CP (2008) Use of a warming bath to prevent lens fogging during laparoscopy. J Endourol 22(11):2413–2414. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0212 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drysch A, Schmitt K, Uribe B, Yoon R, Okhunov Z, Landman J (2016) Comparative analysis of techniques to prevent laparoscopic fogging. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu T-C, Hamill JK, Liley A, Hill AG (2013) Warm, humidified carbon dioxide gas insufflation for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 257(1):44–53. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825f0721 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farley DR, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR (2004) Double-blind, prospective, randomized study of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139(7):739–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM (2009) Re: use of a warming bath to prevent lens fogging during laparoscopy. (From Brown JA, Inocencio MD, and Sundaram CP. J Endourol 2008; 22: 2413). J Endourol 23(7):1213. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0122 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    den Boer KT, Herder JL, Sjoerdsma W, Meijer DW, Gouma DJ, Stassen HG (1999) Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel? Surg Endosc 13(9):869–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flemming E, Bessell JR, Kunert W, Eibl H, Buess G (1996) Principles determining optical clarity in endoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 5(5):440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bessell JR, Flemming E, Kunert W, Buess G (1996) Maintenance of clear vision during laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 5(5):450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    North GR, Erukhimova TL (2009) Atmospheric thermodynamics. [electronic resource]: elementary physics and chemistry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao X, Yan X, Yao X, Xu L, Zhang K, Zhang J, Yang B, Jiang L (2007) The dry-style antifogging properties of mosquito compound eyes and artificial analogues prepared by soft lithography. Adv Mater 19(17):2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ohdaira T, Nagai H, Kayano S, Kazuhito H (2007) Antifogging effects of a socket-type device with the superhydrophilic, titanium dioxide-coated glass for the laparoscope. Surg Endosc 21(2):333–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT (2012) Surfactants and interfacial phenomena, 4th edn. Ringgold Inc, Avon, pp 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chevallier P, Sp Turgeon, Sarra-Bournet C, Rl Turcotte, Gt Laroche (2011) Characterization of Multilayer Anti-Fog Coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(3):750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT (2012) Surfactants and interfacial phenomena, 4th edn. Ringgold Inc, Avon, pp 214–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sarah P, Conley SS, Benjamin R (2016) lee urologic robotic surgery course. American Urolological Association. Accessed 01 May 2016
  25. 25.
    Wong CG, Gu X, Barkoukis M (2013) Novel laparoscope defogging and cleaning device for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). J Endourol 27(1):144Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Calhoun JT, Redan JA (2014) Elimination of laparoscopic lens fogging using directional flow of CO2. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(1):55–61. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422520431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nezhat C, Morozov V (2008) A simple solution to lens fogging during robotic and laparoscopic surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 12(4):431Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan MJ, Karim O (2013) Use of Ethicon Vicryl foil and robotic camera lights to warm the robotic scope lens to prevent lens fogging, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schurr MO, Bablich H, Wurster H, Melzer A, Roth K, Wiest FM, Buess G (1994) A new optic cleaning and visualization stabilizing system for endoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther 3(3):131–134. doi: 10.1080/0961625X.1994.11665539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Piromchai P, Kasemsiri P, Thanaviratananich S (2011) Alternative agents to prevent fogging in head and neck endoscopy. Clin Med Insights 4:1Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fraser L, Gunasekaran S, Cruickshank H (2009) Patient saliva: a useful anti-fog agent for the fibre-optic nasolaryngoscope. Int J Clin Pract 63(11):1668. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02194.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yavuz Y, Skogås JG, Güllüoglu MG, Langø T, Mårvik R (2006) Are cold light sources really cold? Surg Laparosc Endoscand Percutaneous Tech 16(5):370–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd G. Manning
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nathan Papa
    • 1
  • Marlon Perera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shannon McGrath
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel Christidis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Munad Khan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard O’Beirne
    • 4
  • Nicholas Campbell
    • 1
  • Damien Bolton
    • 1
  • Nathan Lawrentschuk
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Melbourne, Austin HealthMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Young Urology Researchers Organisation (YURO)MelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Surgical OncologyPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Engineering (Chemical)University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  5. 5.Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research InstituteMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations