Skip to main content
Log in

Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in adults with sickle cell disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (A case control study)

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Many studies have demonstrated the adverse consequences of pneumoperitoneum. However, few studies have examined the physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

60 ASA 1-П П patients, with cholelithiasis, scheduled for elective LC were allocated into two equal groups: group 1, normal patients without SCD (control group), and group 2, patients with SCD. The perioperative parameters of 30 SCD patients matched by age and sex to the 30 members of the non-sickler control group who underwent cholecystectomy were assessed. Study parameters (in the two groups) included heart rate (HR) per minute, mean blood pressure (MAP, mmHg), PETCO2, and O2 saturation (SpO2) at the following intervals: before induction of anesthesia in the supine position (all except PETCO2), after anesthesia and before CO2 insufflations in the supine position, 15, 30, 45, 60 min after CO2 insufflations in the anti-Trendelenburg position, at the end of CO2 exsufflation in the supine position and 5 min after the end of CO2 exsufflation in the supine position. Arterial blood gases, to measure pH, PaCO2, and PaO2, were determined after induction of anesthesia and before CO2 insufflation in the supine position, then 30 min after CO2 insufflations in the anti-Trendelenburg position, and 5 min after the end of CO2 exsufflation in the supine position. Statistical significance was established at the p < 0.05 level.

Results

Induction of anesthesia produced a significant increase in HR in both groups. CO2 insufflations led to an additional increase in HR and persisted till abdominal deflation. After CO2 insufflations, MAP significantly increased from the baseline at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min, and just before deflation in the anti-Trendelenburg position. CO2 insufflations led to a significant increase in end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) in the study groups, reaching a maximum level just before abdominal deflation in the anti-Trendelenburg position. Regarding SpO2 and PaO2, there were insignificant changes in the two study groups throughout the procedure. In group 2, none of the patients experienced vaso-occlusive crises or other SCD- related complications.

Conclusion

This study proved the safety of LC in patients with SCD and cholelithiasis, and that they can tolerate the physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum as non-SCD adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rennels MB, Dunne MG, Grossman NJ, Schwartz AD (1984) Cholelithiasis in patients with major sickle hemoglobinopathies. Am J Dis Child 138:66–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koshy M, Weiner SJ, Miller ST, Sleeper LA, Vichinsky E, Brown AK, Khakoo Y, Kinney TR (1995) Surgery and anesthesia in sickle cell disease. Co-operative Study of Sickle Cell Diseases. Blood 86:3676–3684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haberkern CM, Neumayr LD, Orringer EP, Earles AN, Robertson SM, Black D, Abboud MR, Koshy M, Idowu O, Vichinsky EP (1997) Cholecystectomy in sickle cell anemia patients: perioperative outcome of 364 cases from the National Preoperative Transfusion Study. Preoperative Transfusion in Sickle Cell Disease Study Group. Blood 89:1533–1542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. David B, Rocco O (1994) physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg 167: 281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carey P D, Kini US (2000) Laparoscopic surgery: the altered physiological response. J Ir Coll Phys Surg 29(2):96–105

    Google Scholar 

  6. Salama MM, Mallouh AA, Hamdan JA (1989) Acute splenic sequestration crises in Saudi children with sickle cell anemia. Ann Trop Ped 9:115–117

    Google Scholar 

  7. Al-mulhim AR, Al-mulhim FM, Al-suwaiygh AA (2002) The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients with sickle cell disease. Am J Surg 183:668–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meininger D, Byhahn C, Bueck M, et al. (2002) Effects of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and acid-base balance during totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. World J Surg 26:1423–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fried M, Krska Z, Danzig V (2001) Does the laparoscopic approach significantly affect cardiac functions in laparoscopic surgery? Pilot study in non-obese and morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 11:293–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham AJ (1994) Laparoscopic surgery- Anaesthetic implication. Surg Endosc 8:1272–1284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Safran D, Sgambati S, Orlando R (1993) laparoscopy in high –risk cardiac patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:548–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Odeberg S, Lijungqvist O, Svenberg T, Gannedahl P, Von Rosen A, Sollevi A (1994) Hemodynamic effects of pneumopritoneum and the influence of posture during anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anesthesia Scand 38:276–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aoki T, Tanii M, Takahashi K, Tateda T, Miyajawa A (1994) Cardiovascular changes and plasma catecholamine levels during laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Analg 78:S8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felber A, Blobner M, Goelger S, Senekowitsch R, Jelen S (1993) Plasma vasopressin in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 79:A32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joris J, Lamy M (1993) Neuroendocrine changes during pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 70:A33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mealy K, Gallaher H, Barry M, Lennon F, Traynor O, Hyland J (1992) Physiological and metabolic responses to open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 79:1061–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hudson J, Wurm WH, O’Donnell TF, et al. (1988) Hemodynamics and prostacycline release in the early phases of aortic surgery. Comparison of transabdominal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Vasc Surg 7:190–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Malley C, Cunningham AJ (2001) Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 19:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zuckerman R, Gold M, Jenkins P, et al. (2001) The effects of pneumoperitoneum and patient position on hemodynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:561–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen NT, Anderson J, Fleming NW, et al. (2002) Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 16:78–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Demiroluk S, Salihoglu Z, Zengin K, et al. (2002) The effects of pneumoperitoneum on respiratory mechanics during bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 12:376–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vichinsky EP, Haberkern CM, Neurnayt L, Earles AN, Black D, Koshy M, Iyer RV (1995) The Preoperative Transfusion Study Group: A comparison of conservative and aggressive transfusion regimens in the perioperative management of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 333:206–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tagge EP, Othersen HB, Jackson SM, Smith CD, Abboud MR, Adams DB (1994) Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the management of cholelithiasis in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Surg 29:209–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulrahman Al Mulhim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youssef, M.A.M., Mulhim, A.A. Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in adults with sickle cell disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (A case control study). Surg Endosc 22, 1513–1518 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9624-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9624-y

Keywords

Navigation