Hybrid minimally invasive surgery—a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery

Abstract

Background

The peroral transluminal approach to the peritoneal cavity appears safe, feasible, and may further reduce the invasiveness of surgery. However, flexible endoscopes have multiple limitations inside the peritoneal cavity, which can potentially be overcome by blending the use of both a laparoscope and a flexible upper endoscope—a hybrid approach. The goal of the present study was to evaluate a hybrid minimally invasive technique for cholecystectomy in a porcine model.

Methods

Hybrid cholecystectomies were performed in acute experiments on 50-kg pigs under general anesthesia. Pneumoperitoneum was created with a Veress needle, and a laparoscopic 10-mm port was inserted. Under laparoscopic observation, the gastric wall incision was done with an endoscopic needle-knife and sphincterotome, and the upper endoscope was advanced into the peritoneal cavity. A laparoscopic 10-mm port was inserted into the right upper quadrant of the abdomen for gallbladder traction to facilitate exposure of the cystic duct and artery. Via the biopsy channel of the flexible endoscope, and using a knife with an isolated tip, a needle knife, and clips, both the cystic duct and artery were identified, clipped, and transected. The gallbladder itself was then dissected and retracted through the mouth, and the gastric wall incision was closed with endoscopic clips.

Results

Five hybrid cholecystectomies were performed without complications. The laparoscopic port enabled a stable pneumoperitoneum, good traction and counter-traction, and improved spatial orientation and visualization. Necropsy did not reveal any intraperitoneal complications.

Conclusions

The hybrid approach increases safety of initial gastric puncture and gastric wall incision, improves orientation and navigation of the flexible endoscope inside the peritoneal cavity, simplifies peroral transgastric cholecystectomy, and could be used to decrease invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery and to facilitate development and clinical introduction of transgastric endoscopic procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

References

  1. 1.

    Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park PO (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasricha P, Scorpio D, Magee C (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill S, Vaughn C, Magee C, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Singh VK, Magee CA, Vaughn CA, Hill SL (2000) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastroenterology 118:A1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB, Vaughn CA, Beitler DM, Chung SSC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Pipitone LJ, Talamini MA, Kalloo AN (2006) Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 20:522–525

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasricha P, Magee C, Vaughn C (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2006) Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63:693–697

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery October 2005. Surg Endosc 20:329–333

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2005) Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:892–896

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–478

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Marohn.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at SAGES Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, April 2006

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to electronic supplementary material.

ESM1 (AVI 3.19 mb)

ESM2 (AVI 8.28 mb)

ESM3 (AVI 3.47 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shih, S.P., Kantsevoy, S.V., Kalloo, A.N. et al. Hybrid minimally invasive surgery—a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery. Surg Endosc 21, 1450–1453 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9329-2

Download citation

Key words

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Abdominal
  • Endoscopy
  • Translumenal
  • NOTES