Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Mechanical Complications on Radiation Exposure During Fluoroscopically Guided Gastrojejunostomy Exchange in the Pediatric Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to evaluate the effects of mechanical complications, such as clogging or coiling, of gastrojejunostomy tubes on radiation exposure during exchange in the pediatric population. In this HIPAA-compliant and IRB-approved study, we retrospectively reviewed procedural records for patients undergoing gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tube exchange during a 4-month period in 2014. Success of the procedure, specifications of the tube, age, and sex of the patient as well as radiation exposure during the procedure were included. Radiation exposure was measured in fluoroscopy time and cumulative air kerma. Complications encountered during exchange were also recorded, if available. Patients presenting for gastrostomy to GJ conversions or combined procedures were excluded from the study. Ordinary and mixed effect linear regression models were used to test associations between GJ tube parameters, presence of mechanical complications, and fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. 146 patients undergoing 285 GJ exchanges met inclusion criteria over the 4-month study period (M:F 82:64). All exchanges were successful with 85 demonstrating a form of mechanical complication (44 coiled, 41 clogged). Of the reported GJ tube specifications, only tube length was significantly associated with mechanical complications (p < 0.001). The presence of mechanical complication was significantly associated with increased radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time (p < 0.0001). Mechanical complications of gastrojejunostomy tubes, such as clogging or coiling, are associated with increased radiation exposure during exchange. Strategies to decrease these complications, including re-siting the gastrostomy tract or placement of a surgical jejunostomy in the event of repeated coiling of a tube should be strongly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lefton-Greif MA. Pediatric dysphagia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19:837–51. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2008.05.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prasse JE, Kikano GE. An overview of pediatric dysphagia. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009;48:247–51. doi:10.1177/0009922808327323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ching YA, Gura K, Modi B, Jaksic T. Pediatric intestinal failure: nutrition, pharmacologic, and surgical approaches. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22:653–63. doi:10.1177/0115426507022006653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod D, Kazmerski K, Iyer K. Pediatric enteral nutrition. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2006;30:S21–6. doi:10.1177/01486071060300S1S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox D, Campagna EJ, Friedlander J, Partrick DA, Rees DI, Kempe A. National trends and outcomes of pediatric gastrostomy tube placement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59:582–8. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000000468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Livingston MH, Shawyer AC, Rosenbaum PL, Jones SA, Walton JM. Fundoplication and gastrostomy versus percutaneous gastrojejunostomy for gastroesophageal reflux in children with neurologic impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:707–14. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah M, Klooster M, Yanni G, Shah A. Frequency and methods of gastrojejunal tube replacement in children. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010;12:223–7. doi:10.1007/s11894-010-0107-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sidhu MK, Goske MJ, Coley BJ, Connolly B, Racadio J, Yoshizumi TT, Utley T, Strauss KJ. Image gently, step lightly: increasing radiation dose awareness in pediatric interventions through an international social marketing campaign. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1115–9. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pobiel RS, Bisset GS, Pobiel MS. Nasojejunal feeding tube placement in children: four-year cumulative experience. Radiology. 1994;190:127–9. doi:10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vitta L, Raghavan A, Morrell R, Sprigg A. Fluoroscopy-guided insertion of nasojejunal tubes in children - setting local diagnostic reference levels. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:1203–8. doi:10.1007/s00247-009-1362-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis EC, Connolly B, Temple M, John P, Chait PG, Vaughan J, Amaral JG. Growth outcomes and complications after radiologic gastrostomy in 120 children. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:963–70. doi:10.1007/s00247-008-0925-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcuard SP, Finley JL, MacDonald KG. Large-bore feeding tube occlusion by yeast colonies. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1993;17:187–90. doi:10.1177/0148607193017002187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearce CB, Duncan HD. Enteral feeding. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or jejunostomy: its indications and limitations. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78:198–204. doi:10.1136/pmj.78.918.198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Reising DL, Neal RS. Enteral tube flushing: what you think are the best practices may not be. AJN Am J Nurs. 2005;105:58–63. doi:10.1097/00000446-200503000-00024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hannah E, John RM. Everything the nurse practitioner should know about pediatric feeding tubes. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013;25:567–77. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12075.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Honig SM (2012) Percutaneous feeding tube including a rescue port. US Patent Application No. 13/679,160 filed on November 16, 2012.

  17. Huang SY, Engstrom BI, Lungren MP, Kim CY. Management of dysfunctional catheters and tubes inserted by interventional radiology. Semin Interv Radiol. 2015;32:67–77. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1549371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim CY, Patel MB, Miller MJ, Suhocki PV, Balius A, Smith TP. Gastrostomy-to-gastrojejunostomy tube conversion: impact of the method of original gastrostomy tube placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:1031–7. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raval MV, Phillips JD. Optimal enteral feeding in children with gastric dysfunction: surgical jejunostomy vs image-guided gastrojejunal tube placement. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1679–82. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlager A, Arps K, Siddharthan R, Rajdev P, Heiss KF. The “omega” jejunostomy tube: a preferred alternative for postpyloric feeding access. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:260–3. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fortunato JE, Darbari A, Mitchell SE, Thompson RE, Cuffari C. The limitations of gastro-jejunal (G-J) feeding tubes in children: a 9-year pediatric hospital database analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:186–9. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40893.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work did not receive any grant funding or other financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin S. H. Koo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

Does not apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koo, K.S.H., Reis, J., Manchester, J. et al. Effects of Mechanical Complications on Radiation Exposure During Fluoroscopically Guided Gastrojejunostomy Exchange in the Pediatric Population. Dysphagia 33, 251–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9854-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9854-7

Keywords

Navigation