Abstract
Structural complexity mediates ecological processes such as predation, competition, and recruitment in marine systems, but relatively little is known about its effects on herbivory. In temperate seagrasses, such as eelgrass (Zostera marina), the primary herbivores are small crustacean and gastropod mesograzers that promote seagrass persistence by preferentially consuming competing epiphytic algae. We used a laboratory grazing experiment, a field colonization experiment, and stable isotope analysis to determine whether one component of eelgrass structural complexity, shoot density, dictates the strength of mesograzer top-down effects on epiphytic algae, and whether this is influenced by mesograzer community composition. Our results suggest that increasing structural complexity shifted eelgrass communities from a bottom-up to a top-down controlled system. In the lab, mesograzers reduced epiphyte standing stock only in high-shoot density experimental communities, though grazing impact varied among different combinations of dominant mesograzer taxa. In our field experiment, epiphyte biomass was inversely correlated with mesograzer density in high but not in low-shoot density eelgrass plots. High-shoot density plots contained lower epiphyte biomass despite housing lower densities of mesograzers, when compared to low-density plots, suggesting potential effects of mesograzer behavior, community composition, or self-shading on epiphyte growth. Our results suggest that structural complexity can strongly influence rates of top-down and bottom-up processes in eelgrass habitat, and should be incorporated into future experiments on the role of herbivores in seagrass ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723
Barry CK (1974) Role of form vision in habitat selection of the grass shrimp Hippolyte californiensis. Mar Biol 26:261–270
Bell JD, Westoby M (1986) Abundance of macrofauna in dense seagrass is due to habitat preference, not predation. Oecologia 68:205–209
Best RJ, Stachowicz JJ (2012) Trophic cascades in seagrass meadows depend on mesograzer variation in feeding rates, predation susceptibility, and abundance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 456:29–42
Boström C, Bonsdorff E (2000) Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity-the importance of seagrass shoot-density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 205:123–138
Bracken M, Dolecal RE, Long JD (2014) Community context mediates the top-down vs. bottom-up effects of grazers on rocky shores. Ecology 95:1458–1463
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304
Byrnes JE, Stachowicz JJ (2009) The consequences of consumer diversity loss: different answers from different experimental designs. Ecology 90(10):2879–2888
Cebrian J, Stutes J, Christiaen B (2013) Effects of grazing and fertilization on epiphyte growth dynamics under moderately eutrophic conditions: implications for grazing rate estimates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 474:121–133
Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER E Ltd, Plymouth
Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802–1813
deMaintenon MJ (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of the Columbellidae (Mollusca: Neogastropoda) and the evolution of herbivory from carnivory. Invertebrate Biol 1:258–288
Duarte CM, Middelburg JJ, Caraco N (2005) Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2:1–8
Duarte CM, Marbà N, Gacia E et al (2010) Seagrass community metabolism: assessing the carbon sink capacity of seagrass meadows. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24:GB4032
Duffy JE (2009) Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 7:437–444
Duffy JE, Harvilicz AM (2001) Species-specific impacts of grazing amphipods in an eelgrass-bed community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 223:201–211
Duffy JE, Macdonald KS, Rhode JM, Parker JD (2001) Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: an experimental test. Ecology 82:2417–2434
Duffy JE, Paul Richardson J, Canuel EA (2003) Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecol Lett 6:637–645
Duffy JE, Paul Richardson J, France KE (2005) Ecosystem consequences of diversity depend on food chain length in estuarine vegetation. Ecol Lett 8:301–309
Duffy JE, Reynolds PL, Boström C et al (2015) Biodiversity mediates top-down control in eelgrass ecosystems: a global comparative-experimental approach. Ecol Lett 18:696–705
Edgar GJ (1990) The use of the size structure of benthic macrofaunal communities to estimate faunal biomass and secondary production. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 137:195–214
Edgar GJ, Shaw C (1995) The production and trophic ecology of shallow-water fish assemblages in southern Australia III. General relationships between sediments, seagrasses, invertebrates and fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 194:107–131
Eggleston DB, Etherington LL, Elis WE (1998) Organism response to habitat patchiness: species and habitat-dependent recruitment of decapod crustaceans. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 223:111–132
Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD et al (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:479–486
Fonseca MS, Bell SS (1998) Influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort, North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 171:109
Fonseca MS, Fisher JS (1986) A comparison of canopy friction and sediment movement between four species of seagrass with reference to their ecology and restoration. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 29:15–22
Heck KL Jr, Crowder LB (1991) Habitat structure and predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. Habitat structure. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 281–299
Heck KL Jr, Orth RJ (2006) Predation in seagrass beds. Seagrasses: biology, ecology, and conservation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 537–550
Hooper DU, Chapin Iii FS, Ewel JJ et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35
Hovel KA, Warneke AM, Virtue-Hilborn SP, Sanchez AE (2016) Mesopredator foraging success in eelgrass (Zostera marina): relative effects of epiphytes, shoot density, and prey abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 474:142–147
Hughes AR, Bando KJ, Rodriguez LF, Williams SL (2004) Relative effects of grazers and nutrients on seagrasses: a meta-analysis approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 282:87–99
Hughes TP, Graham NAJ, Jackson JBC et al (2010) Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience. Trends Ecol Evol 25:633–642
Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732
Irlandi EA (1997) Seagrass patch size and survivorship of an infaunal bivalve. Oikos 78:511
Jaschinski S, Sommer U (2008) Functional diversity of mesograzers in an eelgrass–epiphyte system. Mar Biol 154:475–482
Jaschinski S, Sommer U (2010) Positive effects of mesograzers on epiphytes in an eelgrass system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:77–85
Jaschinski S, Aberle N, Gohse-Reimann S et al (2008) Grazer diversity effects in an eelgrass–epiphyte–microphytobenthos system. Oecologia 159:607–615
Larkum AWD, Orth RJ, Duarte CM (2006) Seagrasses: biology, ecology, and conservation. Springer, Dordrecht
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640
Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:5632–5636
Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412:72–76
Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McCoy ED, Bell SS (1991) Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 3–27
Michel L, Dauby P, Dupont A, Gobert S (2015) Selective top-down control of epiphytic biomass by amphipods from Posidonia oceanica meadows: implications for ecosystem functioning. Belgian J Zool 145:83–93
Moore EC, Hovel KA (2010) Relative influence of habitat complexity and proximity to patch edges on seagrass epifaunal communities. Oikos 119:1299–1311
Nelson WG (1979) Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods: consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 38:225–245
Norberg J (2000) Resource-niche complementarity and autotrophic compensation determines ecosystem-level responses to increased cladoceran species richness. Oecologia 122:264–272
Orth RJ, Heck KL Jr (1980) Structural components of eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows in the lower Chesapeake Bay-fishes. Estuaries Coasts 3:278–288
Orth RJ, Heck KL Jr, Van Montfrans J (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationships. Estuaries Coasts 7:339–350
Orth RJ, Carruthers TJB, Dennison WC et al (2006) A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56:987–996
Paine RT (1992) Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. Nature 355:73–75
Perez-Matus A, Shima JS (2010) Density- and trait-mediated effects of fish predators on amphipod grazers: potential indirect benefits for the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 417:151–U168. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08820
Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 128:304
Reynolds PL, Sotka EE (2011) Non-consumptive predator effects indirectly influence marine plant biomass and palatability. J Ecol 99:1272–1281
Reynolds PL, Richardson JP, Duffy JE (2014) Field experimental evidence that grazers mediate transition between microalgal and seagrass dominance. Limnol Oceanogr 59:1053–1064
Ruppert JLW, Travers MJ, Smith LL et al (2013) Caught in the middle: combined impacts of shark removal and coral loss on the fish communities of coral reefs. PLoS One 8:e74648
Sanders D, Nickel H, Grützner T, Platner C (2008) Habitat structure mediates top–down effects of spiders and ants on herbivores. Basic Appl Ecol 9:152–160
Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163
Sirota L, Hovel KA (2006) Simulated eelgrass Zostera marina structural complexity: effects of shoot length, shoot density, and surface area on the epifaunal community of San Diego Bay, California, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 326:115–131
Sommer U (1999) The impact of herbivore type and grazing pressure on benthic microalgal diversity. Ecol Lett 2:65–69
Stachowicz JJ, Best RJ, Bracken MES, Graham MH (2008) Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:18842–18847
Stoner AW (1980) Perception and choice of substratum by epifaunal amphipods associated with seagrasses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 3:105–111
Tait KJ, Hovel KA (2012) Do predation risk and food availability modify prey and mesopredator microhabitat selection in eelgrass (Zostera marina) habitat? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 426–427:60–67
Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 9:1245–1252
Valentine JF, Duffy JE (2006) The central role of grazing in seagrass ecology. In: Larkum AWD et al (eds) Seagrasses: biology, ecology, and conservation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 463–501
Van Montfrans J, Wetzel RL, Orth RJ (1984) Epiphyte-grazer relationships in seagrass meadows: consequences for seagrass growth and production. Estuaries 7:289
Vergés A, Vanderklift MA, Doropoulos C, Hyndes GA (2011) Spatial patterns in herbivory on a coral reef are influenced by structural complexity but not by algal traits. PLoS One 6:e17115
Warfe DM, Barmuta LA (2004) Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141:171–178 (d)
Waycott M, Duarte CM, Carruthers TJB et al (2009) Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:12377–12381
Whalen MA, Duffy JE, Grace JB (2013) Temporal shifts in top-down vs. bottom-up control of epiphytic algae in a seagrass ecosystem. Ecology 94:510–520
Williams SL, Heck KL Jr (2001) Seagrass community ecology. Marine Community Ecology. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, pp 317–337
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Bayne, J. Boucree, W. Dailey, R. Dunn, A. Harrington, S. Hengen, J. Jaeger, J. Joseph, J. Ledbetter, P. Shukla, and M. Yeager for their advice and assistance both in the laboratory and the field. We would also like to thank J. Long, A. Palacios, J.E. Duffy, J.J Stachowicz, P.L. Reynolds, and members of the Zostera Experimental Network (ZEN) for advice and guidance throughout the study. Our research was supported by a Segal Americorps Education Award, a San Diego State University Harold and June Grant Memorial Scholarship, a CSU COAST Graduate Student Award for Marine Science Research, a Lerner-Grey Grant for Marine Research, and a National Science Foundation grant (OCE- 1336905) to K. Hovel. This is contribution number 62 from the San Diego State University Coastal and Marine Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EPV and KAH conceived of and designed the experiments. EPV performed the experiments and analyzed the data. EPV and KAH wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Ulrich Sommer.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voigt, E.P., Hovel, K.A. Eelgrass structural complexity mediates mesograzer herbivory on epiphytic algae. Oecologia 189, 199–209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4312-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4312-2