Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 187, Issue 3, pp 851–862 | Cite as

Largely flat latitudinal life history clines in the dung fly Sepsis fulgens across Europe (Diptera: Sepsidae)

  • Jeannine Roy
  • Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
  • Patrick T. Rohner
Global change ecology – original research

Abstract

Clinal variation in body size and related life history traits is common and has stimulated the postulation of several eco-geographical rules. Whereas some clinal patterns are clearly adaptive, the causes of others remain obscure. We investigated intra-specific body size, development time and female fecundity (egg size and number) clines across 13 European populations of the dung fly Sepsis fulgens spanning 20° latitude from southern Italy to Estonia in a genetic common garden approach. Despite very short generation times (ca. 2 weeks at 24 °C), we found a converse Bergmann cline (smaller size at higher latitudes). As development time did not change with latitude (flat cline), integral growth rate thus likely declines towards the pole. At the same time, early fecundity, but not egg size, increased with latitude. Rather than being mediated by seasonal time constraints, the body size reduction in the northernmost flies from Estonia could suggest that these are marginal, edge populations, as when omitting them the body size cline became flat as well. Most of the other sepsid species investigated to date also show flat body size clines, a pattern that strikingly differs from Drosophila. We conclude that S. fulgens life history traits appear to be shaped by similar environmental pressures and selective mechanisms across Europe, be they adaptive or not. This reiterates the suggestion that body size clines can result as a secondary consequence of selection pressures shaping an entire life history syndrome, rendering them inconsistent and unpredictable in general.

Keywords

Body size Development time Egg size Fecundity Geographic differentiation Genetic differentiation Latitudinal cline Life history 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Martin Schäfer, Juan Pablo Busso, Anders Kjaersgaard, Nalini Puniamoorthy, Toomas Esperk, and Toomas Tammaru for collecting flies, and the entire Wolfpack for various support. This study was supported by Grant No. SNF 31003A-143787 from the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author contribution statement

JR, WUB and PTR conceived and designed the study, and contributed all to the statistical analysis and the writing of the manuscript. JR and PTR performed the experiments.

Supplementary material

442_2018_4166_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 kb)
442_2018_4166_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (213 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 212 kb)
442_2018_4166_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (56 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 56 kb)
442_2018_4166_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 23 kb)
442_2018_4166_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (XLSX 18 kb)

References

  1. Ang YC, Puniamoorthy J, Pont AC, Bartak M, Blanckenhorn WU, Eberhard WG, Puniamoorthy N, Silva V, Munari L, Meier R (2013) Sepsidnet: a plea for digital reference collections and other science-based digitization initiatives in taxonomy. Syst Entomol 38:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armbruster P, Bradshaw WE, Ruegg K, Holzapfel CM (2001) Geographic variation and the evolution of reproductive allocation in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution 55:439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur AL, Weeks AR, Sgro CM (2008) Investigating latitudinal clines for life history and stress resistance traits in Drosophila simulans from eastern Australia. J Evol Biol 21:1470–1479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size a biological law for ectotherms? Adv Ecol Res 25:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson D, Sibly RM (1997) Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol Evol 12:235–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo RBR, French V, Partridge L (1996) Thermal evolution of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50:2338–2345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauerfeind SS, Schäfer MA, Berger D, Blanckenhorn WU, Fox CW (2018) Replicated latitudinal clines in reproductive traits of European and North American yellow dung flies. Oikos (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Berger D, Walters RJ, Gotthard K (2008) What limits insect fecundity? Body size- and temperature-dependent egg maturation and oviposition in a butterfly. Funct Ecol 22:523–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger D, Postma E, Blanckenhorn WU, Walters RJ (2013) Quantitative genetic divergence and standing genetic (co)variance in thermal reaction norms along latitude. Evolution 67:2385–2399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergmann C (1847) Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Stud 3:595–708Google Scholar
  11. Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Loder N (1999) Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers Distrib 5:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanckenhorn WU (1999) Different growth responses to food shortage and temperature in three insect species with similar life histories. Evol Ecol 13:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanckenhorn WU (2000) Temperature effects on egg size and their fitness consequences in the yellow dung fly. Evol Ecol 14:627–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanckenhorn WU (2007) Case studies of the differential equilibrium hypothesis of sexual size dimorphism in dung flies. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU (eds) Sex, size and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blanckenhorn WU, Demont M (2004) Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in Arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integr Comp Biol 44:413–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Blanckenhorn WU, Fairbairn DJ (1995) Life history adaptation along a latitudinal cline in water striders. J Evol Biol 8:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blanckenhorn WU, Heyland A (2004) The quantitative genetics of two life history trade-offs in the yellow dung fly in abundant and limited food environments. Evol Ecol 18:385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blanckenhorn WU, Bauerfeind SS, Berger D, Davidowitz G, Fox CW, Guillaume F, Nakamura S, Nishimura K, Sasaki H, Stillwell RC, Tachi T, Schäfer MA (2018) Season length—not temperature—drives life-history clines on three continents in a widespread dungfly. Ecography.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Busso JP, Blanckenhorn WU (2018) Climatic factors shaping plastic trade-offs in the polyphenic black scavenger fly Sepsis thoracica (Diptera: Sepsidae). J Biogeo 45:593–603.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Calboli FCF, Gilchrist GW, Partrige L (2003) Different cell size and cell number contribution in two newly established and one ancient body size cline of Drosophila subobscura. Evolution 57:566–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chown SL, Gaston KJ (1999) Exploring links between physiology and ecology at macro-scales: the role of respiratory metabolism in insects. Biol Rev 74:87–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2010) Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biol Rev 85:139–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dmitriew C, Blanckenhorn WU (2012) The role of sexual selection and conflict in mediating among-population variation in mating strategies and sexually dimorphic traits in the black scavenger fly Sepsis punctum. PlosOne 7:e49511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esperk T, Kjaersgaard A, Walters RJ, Berger D, Blanckenhorn WU (2016) Plastic and evolutionary responses to heat stress in a temperate dung fly: negative correlation between basal and induced heat tolerance? J Evol Biol 29:900–915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fabian DK, Lack JB, Mathur V, Schloetterer C, Schmidt PS, Pool JE, Flatt T (2015) Spatially varying selection shapes life history clines among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from sub-Saharan Africa. J Evol Biol 28:826–840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer K, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003) Plasticity in butterfly egg size: why larger offspring at lower temperatures? Ecology 84:3138–3147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flatt T (2016) Genomics of clinal variation in Drosophila: disentangling the interactions of selection and demography. Mol Ecol 25:1023–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 45:341–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garrad R, Booth DT, Furlong MJ (2016) The effect of rearing temperature on development, body size, energetics and fecundity of the diamondback moth. Bull Entomol Res 106:175–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallas R, Schiffer M, Hoffmann AA (2002) Clinal variation in drosophila serrata for stress resistance and body size. Gen Res Camb 79:141–148Google Scholar
  31. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirst AG, Horne CR, Atkinson D (2015) Equal temperature-size responses of the sexes are widespread within arthropod species. Proc R Soc B 282:20152475.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2475 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Honek A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horne CR, Hirst AG, Atkinson D (2015) Temperature-size responses match latitudinal size clines in arthropods, revealing critical differences between aquatic and terrestrial species. Ecol Lett 18:327–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Horne CR, Hirst AG, Atkinson D (2018) Insect temperature-body size trends common to laboratory, latitudinal and seasonal gradients are not found across altitudes. Funct Ecol. 32:948–957.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L (2000) Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287:308–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Imasheva AG, Bubli OA, Lazebny OE (1994) Variation in wing length in Eurasian natural poulations of Drosophila melanonogaster. Heredity 72:508–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. James FC (1970) Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51:365–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. James AC, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L (1997) Genetic and environmental responses to temperature of Drosophila melanogaster from a latitudinal cline. Genetics 146:881–890PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Karan D, Munjal AK, Gibert P, Moreteau B, Parkash R, David JR (1998) Latitudinal clines for morphometrical traits in Drosophila kikkawai: a study of natural populations from the Indian subcontinent. Genet Res Camb 71:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Karan D, Dubey S, Moreteau B, Parkash R, David JR (2000) Geographical clines for quantitative traits in natural populations of a tropical drosophilid: Zaprionus indianus. Genetica 108:91–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kivelä SM, Välimäki P, Carrasco D, Mäenpää MI, Oksanen J (2011) Latitudinal insect body size clines revisited: a critical evaluation of the saw-tooth model. J Anim Ecol 80:1184–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Klepsatel P, Galikova M, Huber CD, Flatt T (2014) Similarities and differences in altitudinal versus latitudinal variation for morphological traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 68:1385–1398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lardies MA, Arias MB, Bacigalupe LD (2010) Phenotypic covariance matrix in life-history traits along a latitudinal gradient: a study case in a geographically widespread crab on the coast of Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 412:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Masaki S (1967) Geographic variation and climatic adaptation in a field cricket. Evolution 21:725–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Misof B et al (2014) Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science 346:763–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mousseau TA (1997) Ectotherms follow the converse to Bergmann’s rule. Evolution 51:630–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nygren GH, Bergström A, Nylin S (2008) Latitudinal body size clines in the butterfly Polyommatus icarus are shaped by gene–environment interactions. J Insect Science 8:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nylin S, Gotthard K (1998) Plasticity in life history traits. Ann Rev Entomol 43:63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Partridge L, Coyne JA (1997) Bergmann’s rule in ectotherms: is it adaptive? Evolution 51:632–635CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Partridge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V (1994) Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48:1269–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pont AC, Meier R (2002) The sepsidae (Diptera) of Europe. Fauna Entomol Scand 37:1–221Google Scholar
  53. Puniamoorthy N, Rifqi M, Tan D, Meier R (2009) From kissing to belly stridulation: comparative analysis reveals surprising diversity, rapid evolution, and much homoplasy in the mating behavior of 27 species of sepsid flies (Diptera: Sepsidae). J Evol Biol 22:2146–2156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Puniamoorthy N, Schäfer MA, Blanckenhorn WU (2012) Sexual selection accounts for geographic reversal of sexual size dimorphism in the dung fly, Sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae). Evolution 66:2117–2126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Puniamoorthy N, Schäfer MA, Römbke J, Meier R, Blanckenhorn WU (2014) Ivermectin sensitivity is an ancient trait affecting all ecdysozoa but shows phylogenetic clustering among sepsid flies. Evol Appl 7:548–554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Roff D (1980) Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the ‘ups and downs’ of clinal variation. Oecologia 45:202–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rohner PT, Bächli G, Pollini Paltrinieri L, Duelli P, Obrist MK, Jochmann R, Blanckenhorn WU (2015) Distribution, diversity gradients and Rapoport’s elevational rule in the black scavenger flies of the Swiss Alps (Diptera: Sepsidae). Insect Conserv Divers 4:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rohner PT, Blanckenhorn WU, Puniamoorthy N (2016) Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development. Evolution 70:1189–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Rohner PT, Blanckenhorn WU, Schäfer MA (2017) Critical weight mediates sex-specific body size plasticity and sexual dimorphism in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scatophagidae). Evol Dev 19:147–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rohner PT, Pitnick S, Blanckenhorn WU, Snook RR, Bächli G, Lüpold S (2018a) Global macroecology of size, sexual size dimorphism, dispersal and range size in fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ecography.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rohner PT, Teder T, Esperk T, Lüpold S, Blanckenhorn WU (2018b) The evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism is associated with increased body size plasticity in males. Funct Ecol 32:581–591.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schilthuizen M, Kellermann V (2014) Contemporary climate change and terrestrial invertebrates: evolutionary versus plastic changes. Evol Appl 7:56–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Shelomi M (2012) Where are we now? Bergmann’s rule sensu lato in insects. Am Nat 180:511–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sota T, Takami Y, Kubota K, Ujiie M, Ishikawa R (2000) Interspecific body size differentiation in species assemblages of the carabid subgenus Ohomopterus in Japan. Pop Ecol 42:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevenson RD (1985) Body size and limits to the daily range of body temperature in terrestrial ectotherms. Am Nat 125:102–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tammaru T, Esperk T (2007) Growth allometry of immature insects: larvae do not grow exponentially. Funct Ecol 21:1099–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teuschl Y, Blanckenhorn WU (2007) The reluctant fly: what makes Sepsis cynipsea females willing to copulate? Anim Behav 73:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Have TM, de Jong G (1996) Adult size in ectotherms: temperature effects on growth and differentiation. J Theor Biol 18:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Voorhies WA (1996) Bergmann size clines: a simple explanation for their occurrence in ectotherms. Evolution 50:1259–1264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Zwaan BJ, Azevedo RBR, James AC, Van’t Land J, Partridge L (2000) Cellular basis of wing size variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a comparison of latitudinal clines on two continents. Heredity 84:338–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental StudiesUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations