Temperature affects phenological synchrony in a tree-killing bark beetle
- 731 Downloads
Phenological synchrony can promote population growth in species with positive density dependence. Variation among life stages in the thermal thresholds for development can foster phenological synchrony under thermal regimes that include frequent occurrence of temperatures between developmental thresholds. The southern pine beetle is an insect with positive density dependence that has recently undergone important shifts in population abundance at the northern extremes of their distribution. We evaluated the hypothesis that cooler winter temperatures in their northern range cause a convergence of the population life stage structure that leads to synchrony in spring flight phenology. We used a combination of approaches. First, in situ laboratory experiments demonstrated a threshold temperature for pupation that was greater than was required for larval development; rearing larvae at lower temperatures increased the pooling of individuals at the end stage of larval development and synchrony in adult emergence. Second, a development rate model showed a similar convergence of the majority of the population at the end stage of larval development when brood experienced the cooler temperatures of the northern region, but not with temperatures from the southern region, or as a null model. Finally, field trapping of wild beetles showed greater synchrony in the pine forests of New Jersey than in the warmer, historically occupied forests of Georgia and Mississippi. Given these results, pine-dominated forests in the northern edge of the southern pine beetle’s range may experience more frequent occurrence of outbreaks, due to the positive feedbacks associated with a synchronous spring emergence of this insect.
KeywordsSouthern pine beetle Stage structure Synchrony Climate change Development model
We thank the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and officials of both the Oconee and Homochitto National Forests (particularly Lee Dunnam) for help in acquiring resources and providing sites for traps. Mike Gallagher, Melanie Maghirang, Brett Manning, JoAnne Barrett, Matt Cloud, Erich Vallery, and Zachary Oliver provided assistance in both field and lab. Thanks to Jim Meeker and Chris Crowe for SPB trapping data and to Ken Clark and John Dighton for logistical support. Research was financially supported by NRI/AFRI 2009-65104-05731 and a cooperative agreement with the Southern Research Station.
Author contribution statement
This research was conceived by MPA and BTS. The experiments were designed by MPA, BTS, JAL, CFA, and ASW. Experiments were conducted by JAL, CFA, and ASW. Data analysis and figures completed by JAL, with input from all authors. JAL wrote the manuscript with considerable editorial contributions from all authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aoki CF (2017) Forest risk and irruptive insect pests: ecology for management in changing times. PhD dissertation. Dept. of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USAGoogle Scholar
- Ayres MP, Martinson SJ, Friedenberg NA (2011) Southern pine beetle ecology: populations within stands. In: Coulson RN (eds) Southern pine beetle II (general technical report SRS 140). USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
- Bentz BJ, Vandygriff J, Jensen C, Coleman T, Maloney P, Smith S, Grady A, Schen-Langenheim G (2014) Mountain pine beetle voltinism and life history characteristics across latitudinal and elevational gradients in the western United States. For Sci 60:343–449Google Scholar
- Billings RF, Upton WW (2010) A methodology for assessing annual risk of southern pine beetle outbreaks across the southern region using pheromone traps. In: Pye JM, Rauscher HM, Sands Y, Lee DC, Beatty JS, Tech (eds) Advances in threat assessment and their application to forest and rangeland management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-802, vol 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest and Southern Research Stations, Portland pp 708Google Scholar
- Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, Butterfield J, Buse A, Coulson JC, Farrar J, Good JEG, Harrington R, Hartley S, Jones TH, Lindroth RL, Press MC, Symrnioudis I, Watt AD, Whittaker JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperatures on insect herbivores. Glob Change Biol 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Moed GH, Kruitwagen CLJJ, De Jong G, Scharloo W (1999) Critical weight for the induction of pupariation in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic and environmental variation. J Evol Biol 12:85–858Google Scholar
- Gara RI (1967) Studies on the attack behavior of the southern pine beetle. I. The spreading and collapse of outbreaks. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 23:349–354Google Scholar
- Mawby WD, Hain FP, Doggett CA (1989) Endemic and epidemic populations of southern pine beetle: implications of the 2-phase model for forest managers. For Sci 35:1075–1087Google Scholar
- Peacher V (2011) Southern pine beetle information system (SPBIS). Southern Pine Beetle II. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, Southern Research Station 140:25–50. http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/download/39081.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2017
- Reeve JD, Turchin P (2002) Evidence for predator-prey cycles in a bark beetle. In: Berryman AA (ed) Population cycles: the case for trophic interactions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan BT (2011) Southern pine beetle behavior and semiochemistry. Southern Pine Beetle II. USDA For Serv Gen Techn Rep South Res Station 140:25–50Google Scholar
- Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Masaki S (1986) Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar