Abstract
To clarify the linkage between flowering phenology and pollination success in alpine plant communities, we quantified the seasonality of flower visitors, the temporal transition of floral resources, and the variation in pollination success of alpine plants in northern Japan. Bumble bees, syrphid flies, and non-syrphid flies were the predominant flower visitors. Foraging activity of bumble bees increased toward the late flowering period reflecting the life cycle of colony development. The activity of syrphid flies was sensitive to ambient temperature, while that of non-syrphid flies remained high throughout the season. Flower production of bee-pollinated plants fluctuated significantly between years with a bimodal pattern peaking in the early and late periods, while flower production of fly-pollinated plants was less variable between years. Fruit-set success of bee-pollinated plants increased considerably from the early to the late flowering period, while the trend for fly-pollinated plants was less marked. Three times more visits of dipteran insects are necessary for fly-pollinated plants to achieve fruiting success comparable to bee-pollinated plants. Bumble bees are potentially excellent pollinators, but the visitation frequency is low early in the season. Lower pollination ability of dipteran insects may be compensated for by abundant flower visits. The relationships between flowering phenology and fruit-set success of alpine plant communities highly depend on the type of pollinators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge G, Inouye DW, Forrest JRK, Barr WA, Miller-Rushing AJ (2011) Emergence of a mid-season period of low floral resources in a montane meadow ecosystem associated with climate change. J Ecol 99:905–913. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01826.x
Amsalem E, Grozinger CM, Padilla M, Hefetz A (2015) Bumble bee sociobiology: the physiological and genomic bases of bumble bee social behaviour. Adv Insect Physiol 48:37–93. doi:10.1016/bs.aiip.2015.01.001
Arroyo MTK, Primack R, Armesto J (1982) Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. Am J Bot 69:82–97. doi:10.2307/2442833
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft 67:1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bingham RA, Orthner AR (1998) Efficient pollination of alpine plants. Nature 391:238–239. doi:10.1038/34564
Bischoff M, Campbell DR, Lord JM, Robertson AW (2013) The relative importance of solitary bees and syrphid flies as pollinators of two outcrossing plant species in the New Zealand alpine. Austral Ecol 38:169–176. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02389.x
Campbell DR, Bischoff M, Load JM, Robertson W (2010) Flower color influences insect visitation in alpine New Zealand. Ecology 91:2638–2649. doi:10.1890/09-0941.1
Crone EE (2013) Response of social and solitary bees to pulsed floral resources. Am Nat 182:465–473. doi:10.1086/671999
Elberling H, Olesen JM (1999) The structure of a high latitude plant-flower visitor system: the dominance of flies. Ecography 22:314–323. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00507.x
Goulson D, Wright NP (1998) Flower constancy in the hoverflies Episyrphus balteatus (Degeer) and Syrphus ribesii (L.) (Syrphidae). Behav Ecol 9:213–219. doi:10.1093/beheco/9.3.213
Heinrich B (1979) “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255. doi:10.2307/1937652
Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90. doi:10.2307/3565403
Holway JG, Ward RT (1965) Phenology of alpine plants in northern Colorado. Ecology 46:73–83. doi:10.2307/1935259
Iler AM, Inouye DW, Høye TT, Miller-Rushing AJ, Burkle LA, Johnston EB (2013) Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate. Glob Chang Biol 19:2348–2359. doi:10.1111/gcb.12246
Inouye DW, Larson BMH, SSymank A, Kevan PG (2015) Flies and flowers III. Ecology of foraging and pollination. J Pollinat Ecol 16:115–133
Kameyama Y, Kudo G (2009) Flowering phenology influences seed production and outcrossing rate in populations of an alpine snowbed shrub, Phyllodoce aleutica: effects of pollinators and self-incompatibility. Ann Bot 103:1385–1394. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp037
Kasagi T, Kudo G (2003) Variations in bumble bee preference and pollen limitation among neighboring populations: comparisons between Phyllodoce caerulea and Phyllodoce aleutica (Ericaceae) along snowmelt gradients. Am J Bot 90:1321–1327. doi:10.3732/ajb.90.9.1321
Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1994) Fly pollination of Linum lewisii (Linaceae). Am J Bot 81:1091–1095. doi:10.2307/2445470
Kevan PG (1972) Insect pollination of high arctic flowers. Ecology 60:831–847. doi:10.2307/2258569
Kevan PG, Baker HG (1983) Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu Rev Entomol 28:407–453. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.28.010183.002203
Konno Y (2006) Species composition of anthophilous Diptera and Hymenoptera in the Daisetsu Mountains. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 50:25–32. doi:10.1303/jjaez.2006.25
Krebs CJ, Boonstra R, Cowcill K, Kenney AJ (2009) Climatic determinants of berry crops in the boreal forest of the southwestern Yukon. Botany 87:401–408. doi:10.1139/B09-013
Kudo G (1991) Effects of snow-free period on the phenology of alpine plants inhabiting snow patches. Arct Alp Res 23:436–443. doi:10.2307/1551685
Kudo G (1993) Relationship between flowering time and fruit set of the entomophilous alpine shrub, Rhododendron aureum (Ericaceae), inhabiting snow patches. Am J Bot 80:1300–1304. doi:10.2307/2445714
Kudo G (2006) Flowering phenologies of animal-pollinated plants: reproductive strategies and agents of selection. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 139–158
Kudo G (2014) Vulnerability of phenological synchrony between plants and pollinators in an alpine ecosystem. Ecol Res 29:571–581. doi:10.1007/s11284-013-1108-z
Kudo G (2016) Landscape structure of flowering phenology in alpine ecosystems: significance of plant-pollinator interactions and evolutionary aspects. In: Kudo G (ed) Structure and function of mountain ecosystems in Japan. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–62. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55954-2
Kudo G, Hirao AS (2006) Habitat-specific responses in the flowering phenology and seed set of alpine plants to climate variation: implications for global-change impacts. Popul Ecol 48:49–58. doi:10.1007/s10144-005-0242-z
Kudo G, Suzuki S (2002) Relationships between flowering phenology and fruit-set of dwarf shrubs in alpine fellfields in northern Japan: a comparison with a subarctic heathland in northern Sweden. Arct Ant Alp Res 34:185–190. doi:10.2307/1552470
Kudo G, Hirao AS, Kawai Y (2011) Pollination efficiency of bumblebee queens and workers in the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum. Int J Plant Sci 172:70–77. doi:10.1086/657282
Kwak MM, Bergman P (1996) Early flowers of Bartsia alpina (Scrophulariaceae) and the visitation by bumblebees. Acta Bot Neerl 45:355–366. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.1996.tb00522.x
Larson BMH, Kevan PG, Inouye DW (2001) Flies and flowers: taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators. Can Entomol 133:439–465. doi:10.4039/Ent133439-4
Makrodimos N, Blionis GJ, Krigas N, Vokou D (2008) Flower morphology, phenology and visitor patterns in an alpine community on Mt Olympos, Greece. Flora 203:449–468. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2007.07.003
McCall C, Primack RB (1992) Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities. Am J Bot 79:434–442. doi:10.2307/2445156
Molau U, Nordenhäll U, Eriksen B (2005) Onset of flowering and climate variability in an alpine landscape: a 10-year study from Swedish Lapland. Am J Bot 92:422–431. doi:10.3732/ajb.92.3.422
Moquet L, Vanderplanck M, Moerman R, Quinet M, Roger N, Michez D, Jacquemart AL (2017) Bumblebees depend on ericaceous species to survive in temperate heathlands. Insect Conserv Divers 10:78–93. doi:10.1111/icad.12201
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, Hara RBO, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 4 Sept 2017
Orford KA, Vaughan IP, Memmott J (2015) The forgotten flies: the importance of non-syrphid Diptera as pollinators. Proc R Soc B 282:20142934. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2934
Pyke GH, Inouye DW, Thomson JD (2011) Activity and abundance of bumble bees near Crested Butte, Colorado: diel, seasonal, and elevation effects. Ecol Entomol 36:511–521. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01295.x
Rathcke B (1988) Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. Ecology 69:446–457. doi:10.2307/1940443
Rathcke B, Lacey EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:179–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001143
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 4 Sept 2017
Reader RJ (1975) Competitive relationships of some bog ericads for major insect pollinators. Can J Bot 53:1300–1305. doi:10.1139/b75-156
Reader RJ (1977) Bog ericad flowers: self-compatibility and relative attractiveness to bees. Can J Bot 55:2279–2287. doi:10.1139/b77-259
Rotheray G, Gilbert F (2011) The natural history of hoverflies. Forrest Text, London
Selås V (2000) Seed production of a masting dwarf shrub, Vaccinium myrtillus, in relation to previous reproduction and weather. Can J Bot 78:423–429. doi:10.1139/b00-017
Straka JR, Starzomski BM (2015) Fruitful factors: what limits seed production of flowering plants in the alpine? Oecologia 178:249–260. doi:10.1007/s00442-014-3169-2
Tiusanen M, Hebert PDN, Schmidt NM, Roslin T (2016) One fly to rule them all—muscid flies are the key pollinators in the Arctic. Proc R Soc B 283:20161271. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1271
Totland Ø (1993) Pollination in alpine Norway: flowering phenology, insect visitors, and visitation rates in two plant communities. Can J Bot 71:1072–1079. doi:10.1139/b93-124
Totland Ø (1994) Influence of climate, time of day and season, and flower density on insect flower visitation in alpine Norway. Arct Alp Res 26:66–71. doi:10.2307/1551879
Wagner J, Lechleitner M, Hosp D (2016) Pollen limitation is not the rule in nival plants: a study from the European Central Alps. Am J Bot 103:375–387. doi:10.3732/ajb.1500214
Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Woodcock TS, Larson BMH, Kevan PG, Inouye DW, Lunau K (2014) Flies and flowers II: floral attractants and rewards. J Pollinat Ecol 12:63–94
Yumoto T (1986) The ecological pollination syndromes of insect-pollinated plants in an alpine meadow. Ecol Res 1:83–95. doi:10.1007/BF02361207
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Y. Amagai, Y. Aoshima, K. Chen, M. Tomita, H. Muroya, and Y. Kamano for their assistance in the field surveys and laboratory works. This study is partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant numbers 23405006, 15H02641, and 17K07551.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author contribution statement
YM and GK conceived the idea, designed the experiments, conducted field work, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Richard Karban.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mizunaga, Y., Kudo, G. A linkage between flowering phenology and fruit-set success of alpine plant communities with reference to the seasonality and pollination effectiveness of bees and flies. Oecologia 185, 453–464 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3946-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3946-9