, Volume 184, Issue 1, pp 247–257 | Cite as

Facilitation in Caribbean coral reefs: high densities of staghorn coral foster greater coral condition and reef fish composition

  • Brittany E. Huntington
  • Margaret W. Miller
  • Rachel Pausch
  • Lee Richter
Community ecology – original research


Recovery of the threatened staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) is posited to play a key role in Caribbean reef resilience. At four Caribbean locations (including one restored and three extant populations), we quantified characteristics of contemporary staghorn coral across increasing conspecific densities, and investigated a hypothesis of facilitation between staghorn coral and reef fishes. High staghorn densities in the Dry Tortugas exhibited significantly less partial mortality, higher branch growth, and supported greater fish abundances compared to lower densities within the same population. In contrast, partial mortality, branch growth, and fish community composition did not vary with staghorn density at the three other study locations where staghorn densities were lower overall. This suggests that density-dependent effects between the coral and fish community may only manifest at high staghorn densities. We then evaluated one facilitative mechanism for such density-dependence, whereby abundant fishes sheltering in dense staghorn aggregations deliver nutrients back to the coral, fueling faster coral growth, thereby creating more fish habitat. Indeed, dense staghorn aggregations within the Dry Tortugas exhibited significantly higher growth rates, tissue nitrogen, and zooxanthellae densities than sparse aggregations. Similarly, higher tissue nitrogen was induced in a macroalgae bioassay outplanted into the same dense and sparse aggregations, confirming greater bioavailability of nutrients at high staghorn densities. Our findings inform staghorn restoration efforts, suggesting that the most effective targets may be higher coral densities than previously thought. These coral-dense aggregations may reap the benefits of positive facilitation between the staghorn and fish community, favoring the growth and survivorship of this threatened species.


Positive density-dependence Acropora cervicornis Haemulids Reef restoration Coral growth 



Funding for this project was provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coral Reef Conservation Program and the National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office. Logistical support was provided by the National Park Service (T. Ziegler, T. Gottshall, and K. Nimmo), The Nature Conservancy (K. Amon-Lewis and C. Clade), and the NOAA Restoration Center (T. Moore and S. Griffin). Sampling was conducted under permits DRTO-2014-SCI-0005 from the National Park Service, STX026-12 from the US Virgin Islands Division of Fish and Wildlife, and SAL-14-1546-SRP from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Field assistance from A. Bright, C. Cameron, M. Ladd, K. Ondrasik, and C. Vilmar is gratefully acknowledged. This manuscript was greatly improved by the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers and Dr. Stuart Sandin, handling editor.

Author contribution statement

BH and MM conceived and designed the monitoring study and experiments. All authors contributed to completing field surveys and experiments. LR and RP processed experiments in the laboratory. BH analyzed the data and led authorship of the manuscript; other authors provided substantial editorial advice during multiple manuscript revisions.

Compliance with ethical standards


Funding for this project was provided by the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP Project ID 819), the National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office, and a National Research Council Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (Huntington).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

442_2017_3859_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1206 kb)


  1. Agudo-Adriani EA, Cappelletto J, Cavada-Blanco F, Croquer A (2016) Colony geometry and structural complexity of the endangered species Acropora cervicornis partly explains the structure of their associated fish assemblage. PeerJ 4:e1861CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Filip L, Dulvy NK, Gill JA, Côté IM, Watkinson AR (2009) Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexity. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 276:3019–3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer KE, Zedler JB (1998) Effects of nitrogen additions on the vertical structure of a constructed cordgrass marsh. Ecol Appl 8:692–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozec Y, Yakob L, Bejarano S, Mumby PJ (2013) Reciprocal facilitation and non-linearity maintain habitat engineering on coral reefs. Oikos 122:428–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruno JF, Selig ER, Casey KS, Page CA, Willis BL, Harvell CD, Sweatman H, Melendy AM (2007) Thermal stress and coral cover as drivers of coral disease outbreaks. PLoS Biol 5:e124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkepile DE, Allgeier JE, Shantz AA, Pritchard CE, Lemoine NP, Bhatti LH, Layman CA (2013) Nutrient supply from fishes facilitates macroalgae and suppresses corals in a Caribbean coral reef ecosystem. Sci Rep 3:1493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmunds PJ, Carpenter RC (2001) Recovery of Diadema antillarum reduces macroalgal cover and increases abundance of juvenile corals on a Caribbean reef. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5067–5071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner TA, Cote IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR (2003) Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960. doi: 10.1126/science.1086050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gascoigne J, Lipcius RN (2004) Allee effects in marine systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 269:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Gómez JM, Hódar JA, Castro J, Baraza E (2004) Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants. Ecol Appl 14:1128–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham MH (2004) Effects of local deforestation on the diversity and structure of southern California giant kelp forest food webs. Ecosystems 7:341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffin S, Spathias H, Moore T, Baums I, Griffin B (2012) Scaling up Acropora nurseries in the Caribbean and improving techniques, Cairns, Australia edn. James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffin JN, Schrack EC, Lewis K, Baums IB, Soomdat N, Silliman BR (2015a) Density-dependent effects on initial growth of a branching coral under restoration. Restor Ecol 23:197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffin S, Nemeth M, Moore T, Gintert B (2015b) Restoration using Acropora cervicornis at the T/V MARGARA grounding site. Coral Reefs 34:885. doi: 10.1007/s00338-015-1310-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EM, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952. doi: 10.1126/science.1149345 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heck K, Able K, Roman C, Fahay M (1995) Composition, abundance, biomass, and production of macrofauna in a New England estuary: comparisons among eelgrass meadows and other nursery habitats. Estuar Coast 18:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herzlieb S, Kadison E, Blondeau J, Nemeth RS (2006) Comparative assessment of coral reef systems located along the insular platform south of St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands and the relative effects of natural and human impacts. Proceedings of 10th International Coral Reef Conference 4:1144–1151Google Scholar
  19. Huntington BE, Miller MW (2014) Location-specific metrics for rapidly estimating the abundance and condition of the threatened coral Acropora cervicornis. Restor Ecol 22:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Idjadi J, Edmunds P (2006) Scleractinian corals as facilitators for other invertebrates on a Caribbean reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 319:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaap W (1998) Boom-bust cycles in Acropora. Reef Encounter 23:12–13Google Scholar
  22. Jackson JBC (2001) What was natural in the coastal oceans? Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5411–5418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091092898 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston L, Miller M (2014) Negative indirect effects of neighbors on imperiled scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 33:1047–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knowlton N, Lang JC, Keller BD (1990) Case study of natural population collapse: post-hurricane predation on Jamaican staghorn corals. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci 31:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenihan HS, Peterson CH (1998) How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oyster reefs. Ecol Appl 8:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lidz BH, Zawada DG (2013) Possible return of Acropora cervicornis at Pulaski Shoal, Dry Tortugas National Park, Florida. J Coast Res 29:256–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lirman D (1999) Reef fish communities associated with Acropora palmata: relationships to benthic attributes. Bull Mar Sci 65:235–252Google Scholar
  28. McClanahan T, Muthiga N, Kamukuru A, Machano H, Kiambo R (1999) The effects of marine parks and fishing on coral reefs of northern Tanzania. Biol Conserv 89:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer JL, Schultz ET (1985) Tissue condition and growth rate of corals associated with schooling fish. Limnol Oceanogr 30:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer JL, Schultz ET, Helfman GS (1983) Fish schools: an asset to corals. Science 220:1047–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller M, Huntington B (2015) Coral, Fish and other data to inform staghorn coral recovery in the Caribbean Sea from 2012-04-05 to 2014-07-28 (NCEI accession 0127933). Version 1.1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. DatasetGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller RJ, Adams AJ, Ebersole JP, Ruiz E (2007) Evidence for positive density-dependent effects in recovering Diadema antillarum populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 349:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mumby PJ, Steneck RS (2008) Coral reef management and conservation in light of rapidly evolving ecological paradigms. Trends Ecol Evol 23:555–563. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mumby PJ, Harborne AR, Williams J, Kappel CV, Brumbaugh DR, Micheli F, Holmes KE, Dahlgren CP, Paris CB, Blackwell PG (2007) Trophic cascade facilitates coral recruitment in a marine reserve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8362–8367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702602104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Munday PL (2004) Habitat loss, resource specialization, and extinction on coral reefs. Global Change Biol 10:1642–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Marine Fisheries Service (2015) Recovery plan for elkhorn (Acropora palmata) and staghorn (Acropora cervicornis) corals. Prepared by the Acropora Recovery Team for the National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  37. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2006) The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments. Front Ecol Environ 4:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perry CT, Steneck RS, Murphy GN, Kench PD, Edinger EN, Smithers SG, Mumby PJ (2015) Regional-scale dominance of non-framework building corals on Caribbean reefs affects carbonate production and future reef growth. Glob Change Biol 21:1153–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riegl B, Purkis S, Keck J, Rowlands G (2009) Monitored and modeled coral population dynamics and the refuge concept. Mar Pollut Bull 58:24–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Roff G, Mumby PJ (2012) Global disparity in the resilience of coral reefs. Trends Ecol Evol 27:404–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers A, Blanchard JL, Mumby PJ (2014) Vulnerability of coral reef fisheries to a loss of structural complexity. Curr Biol 24:1000–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sandin SA, Smith JE, DeMartini EE, Dinsdale EA, Donner SD, Friedlander AM, Konotchick T, Malay M, Maragos JE, Obura D, Pantos O, Paulay G, Richie M, Rohwer F, Schroeder RE, Walsh S, Jackson JBC, Knowlton N, Sala E (2008) Baselines and degradation of coral reefs in the Northern Line Islands. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001548 Google Scholar
  43. Schutte VGW, Selig ER, Bruno JF (2010) Regional spatio-temporal trends in Caribbean coral reef benthic communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 402:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shantz AA, Ladd MC, Schrack E, Burkepile DE (2015) Fish-derived nutrient hotspots shape coral reef benthic communities. Ecol Appl 25:2142–2152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Shima JS, Osenberg CW, St. Mary CM (2008) Quantifying site quality in a heterogeneous landscape: recruitment of a reef fish. Ecology 89:86–94. doi: 10.1890/07-0021.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shinn EA (1966) Coral growth-rate, an environmental indicator. J Paleontol 40:233–240Google Scholar
  47. Silliman BR, Schrack E, He Q, Cope R, Santoni A, van der Heide T, Jacobi R, Jacobi M, van de Koppel J (2015) Facilitation shifts paradigms and can amplify coastal restoration efforts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:14295–14300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515297112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Stimson J (1997) The annual cycle of density of zooxanthellae in the tissues of field and laboratory-held Pocillopora damicornis (linnaeus). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 214:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Veal C, Carmi M, Fine M, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2010) Increasing the accuracy of surface area estimation using single wax dipping of coral fragments. Coral Reefs 29:893–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker BK, Larson E, Moulding AL, Gilliam DS (2012) Small-scale mapping of indeterminate arborescent acroporid coral (Acropora cervicornis) patches. Coral Reefs 31:885–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Young C, Schopmeyer S, Lirman D (2012) A review of reef restoration and coral propagation using the threatened genus Acropora in the Caribbean and western Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci 88:1075–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brittany E. Huntington
    • 1
  • Margaret W. Miller
    • 2
  • Rachel Pausch
    • 1
  • Lee Richter
    • 1
  1. 1.Cooperative Institute of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Protected Resources Division, Southeast Fisheries Science CenterNational Marine Fisheries ServiceMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations